The Quizbowl Resource Center

The Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence is pleased to announce that it is accepting nominations for the 2010 Benjamin Cooper Academic Ambassador Awards. The awards, which recognize those who contribute to the “spirit and honor of quizbowl competition,” will be presented at the 2010 PACE National Scholastics Championship in Fairfax, Virginia, on June 5-6. The Benjamin Cooper Academic Ambassador Award will be given to a coach, advisor, administrator, tournament organizer, or other person who has made significant contributions to high school quizbowl. A second award, the Young Ambassador Award, will be given to someone affiliated with a college or high school program who, despite his or her young age, has already made valuable contributions to high school academic competition community. Nominations will be accepted until March 1, 2010. For more information on the award and the nomination process, please see below.

The Benjamin Cooper Awards:

The Benjamin Cooper Academic Ambassador Award and the Young Ambassador Award recognize those who have made substantial contributions to the “spirit and honor of quizbowl competition.” Benjamin Cooper, for whom the award is named, was a model student at the Georgetown Day School in Washington, DC, who was well-liked among his colleagues and the faculty. He participated in many activities in school and in service to the community. Because of his enthusiasm and encouragement to promote academic competition among his team members, he was selected as the captain of the varsity team for the 1997-1998 school year. On August 12, 1997, Ben was tragically killed in an automobile accident while returning from his summer job.

The first Cooper Award was presented by PACE to Georgetown Day School team advisor Sue Ikenberry in honor of Ben at the 1998 NSC. Subsequent awards have been presented every year, and a complete list of winners will soon be available on the PACE website. The Young Ambassador Award was first presented at the 2004 NSC.

Any member of the quizbowl community is eligible for the Cooper Award. Eligibility for the Young Ambassador Award is restricted to those currently affiliated with high school or college programs. Because there are always many deserving candidates, PACE welcomes re-nomination of those nominated last year who have continued to contribute to the quizbowl community.

To submit a nomination, please compose a statement of no more than 1,000 words detailing your nominee’s contributions to the quizbowl community. This statement should include a summary of positions held by the nominee as well as a specific explanation of why, in your opinion, he or she has contributed to the “spirit and honor of quizbowl competition.”

Please email your nomination statement to this year’s Cooper Award coordinator, Kyle Haddad-Fonda, at kyle.haddad-fonda@magd.ox.ac.uk no later than March 1, 2010. Kyle will confirm receipt of your nomination within 48 hours of the time you submit it. In your email, please include your contact information in case the PACE Cooper Award Committee wishes to contact you for additional information about the nominee. All nomination statements are strictly confidential and will be seen only by the PACE members involved in the selection process.

Members of the PACE Cooper Award Committee will deliberate throughout the month of March, with a final vote on the winners scheduled for the last week of March. The winners will be announced on the hsquizbowl.org message board and on the PACE website during the first week of April. The awards will be formally presented to the winners on the first day of the 2010 NSC.

If you have any questions about this year’s Cooper Award or to submit a nomination, please contact Kyle Haddad-Fonda at kyle.haddad-fonda@magd.ox.ac.uk.

Congratulations to the University of Chicago for their first place finish in the 2009-2010 mid-season poll, after receiving nine out of a possible twenty first place votes. In second place, with four first place votes was the University of Minnesota. Third place was taken by Brown A, powered by their seven  first place votes. Overall, fifty teams received votes off of twenty ballots.

Teams marked with asterisks received votes on all twenty ballots.

1.  Chicago A*  (9 first place votes) 481 points

2. Minnesota A* (4 first place votes) 479 points

3.  Brown A* (7 first place votes) 475 points

4.  Harvard A* 434 points

5.  Illinois A* 430 points

6. Pennsylvania* 396 points

7. Maryland * 336 points

8. California-San Diego A* 314 points

9. Virginia Commonwealth * 313 points

10. Carnegie Mellon* 287 points

11. California-Irvine 248 points

12. State College High School 195 points

13.  Yale 187 points

14.  Michigan* 175 points

15. Toronto 173 points

16. Maggie L Walker Governor’s School 162 points

17. Stanford 156 points

18. Chicago B 148 points

19. (tied) Missouri and South Carolina 146 points

21.  MIT 106 points

22. Clemson 95 points

23. Carleton 69 points

24. Brown B 64 points

25.  Rice 58 points

Also receiving votes: Swarthmore (41), Columbia (41), Florida State (40), Iowa (39), UCLA (38), Princeton (36),  Vanderbilt (25), RPI (20), Georgia (18), Florida (16), Virginia (16), Berkeley (16),  Cornell (12), Washington University of St Louis (12), Harvard B (10), South Florida (7), Minnesota B (6), Lawrence (4),  Western Ontario (3), Ottawa (2), Illinois B (2), Southside High School (2), Dartmouth (2), North Carolina (1), Caltech (1)

Of course, this wouldn’t be possible without the voters. Thanks go out to Zach Foster, Mike Bentley, Matt Weiner, Evan Adams, Matt Bollinger, Graham Moyer, Andrew Hart, Joey Montoya, Andy Watkins, Mike Cheyne, Auroni Gupta, Trygve Meade, Dallin Kelson, Charles Hang, Gautam Kandlikar, Chris Lionel, Chris Greenwood, Mehdi Razvi, and Eric Douglass for all submitting ballots.

As the new College Poll Coordinator, it is my pleasure to announce the 2009 college mid-season top 25 poll. To vote simply email me a list of what you consider to be the top 25 college teams in the country. B teams and high school teams will be allowed within reason.

Polls will be open until 10 PM EST on Tuesday, December 1st.
Polls should be in my email at georgeberry292@hotmail.com by 10 PM EST on the 1st. If your ballot isn’t there then, it will not be included.

I reserve the right to throw out any ridiculous or gimmick ballots determined as such by my discretion. You will be notified of said rejection and offered the opportunity to resubmit a ballot before the deadline.

This year, the Cvijanovich family will once again be awarding grants for the purchase of buzzers to selected high school quizbowl teams, in memory of Matt Cvijanovich. Information is at   http://mattsbuzzers.com/ or the Matt’s Buzzers Facebook group, http://www.facebook.com/pages/Matts-Buzzers/125131611243.

Congratulations to Maggie L. Walker Governor’s School for Government and International Studies’ A team (Richmond, Virginia) for finishing first in the 2009-10 pre-season high school quiz bowl poll. With 15 ballots received, Maggie Walker received the first place vote on 14 of them.

State College Area High School (State College, Pennsylvania) finished second and received the other first place vote. Paul M. Dorman High School’s A team (Roebuck, South Carolina), Hunter College High School (New York City, New York) and Southside High School (Greenville, South Carolina) round out the top five.

Congratulations to these teams and to all 41 teams that received votes.

Complete results are after the jump. Read the rest of this entry »

Last year, I correctly predicted the entire ICT playoff bracket in August and made the not-exactly-earth-shattering proclamation that either Chicago or Brown would win national championships. I also got a lot of other stuff wrong. Let’s see how it pans out this time.

Last year’s theme in the predictions was upsets and the lack of a great history player in quizbowl. Both of those things will continue this year, but I suggest that the new theme is a very solid freshman class. Shantanu Jha and Dallas Simons made huge impacts at high levels last time around, and Kurtis Droge and Charlie Dees also proved their bona fides. This time, you’re going to see a group that may not be as immediately relevant at the highest levels, but is deeper and will be responsible for racking up a greater quantity of wins throughout the year.

Your major contenders remain Brown and Chicago, with Harvard, Minnesota, Illinois, MIT, Stanford, and Irvine capable of pulling upsets. Dartmouth drops into rebuilding mode for the time being. Programs like Maryland, Penn, VCU, and UCSD make up a solid third tier, not quite ready to knock off a title contender but still clearly ahead of the masses.

Region-by-region, here’s how things go:

MID-ATLANTIC: Things get way more interesting in the greater DC area as Eric Mukherjee moves to Penn, trailing a U-Haul full of Balz-Schiemann Reaction knowledge behind him, and last year’s respectable Penn team also comes back to form a very solid starting four. Maryland loses solid contributor Jeff Amoros but returns everyone else. VCU will see reduced playing time from Andrew Alexander as he moves to med school, but picks up NAQT CCCT champion George Berry and a gaggle of newly eligible high schoolers taking dual-credit classes. These three teams will contend for all of the titles as the year starts, but as the weeks go on they may be joined by others, such as a reinvigorated UVa, which recruits 140 PPG PACE NSC player Chuhern Hwang to join Will Butler and continues to pine for the return of Leo Wolpert. Swarthmore returns all of their scoring and adds high school nationals standout Ben Geselowitz. Columbia did very well last year at all of the events they played, and will hopefully play more this time. UNC seems to be fading from contention, but they still have the raw talent to get good quickly if they start focusing again. What’s going on at Duke? No one knows. UMBC and George Mason will hopefully show up to things, and Virginia Tech gets both enthusiastic freshman and TJ veteran Harry White, and experienced player and organizer Dan Goff, as motivation to start playing more tournaments. I don’t know if Chris Horng is coming back to Rutgers or not, but he almost had a breakout year last spring and could turn some heads if his improvement continues, especially if he can convince Jeremy Hixson to show up to some tournaments rather than just writing solid packets for every event Rutgers participates in. Princeton seems like it could do well with Kunle and Dan still participating; hopefully last year’s scanty tournament attendance schedule for this team was a fluke. I heard a rumor that the GWU club discovered a heretofore forgotten cache of money, which I hope they will use to attend more events. Also, I see that Dan Puma is going to Loyola-MD so let’s hope he gets a team started there. Does William & Mary still have a team?

MIDWEST: The cold truth is that Chicago and Minnesota are better than Illinois right now. However, both of those teams tend to have less than perfect attendance by their best possible foursome at regular-season events, so who knows where the early winners will come from. As Illinois integrates Ike Jose into the equation and sees what Will Turner can add to a Mike Sorice who knows his championship eligibility window is closing, we very well may see a changing of the pecking order here. Iowa is legit, Carleton is a team of the future, and a bunch of other people in the upper Midwest like playing high school questions and therefore will continue to suck. Michigan, Missouri, and Ohio State are on the same page as Carleton with enough talent to win more games than they lose even in a stacked event, but not enough to challenge the national contenders for at least another year. Michigan State seems likely to attend some more real tournaments this year, so good for them. I don’t know what to expect out of Lawrence, WUSTL, or Truman right now. Carnegie Mellon will do solidly in both Midwestern and Mid-Atlantic events. Chicago B and C are big wild cards; Chicago B pulled off some impressive performances last year (including beating both the 2nd and 3rd place teams at ACF Nationals) and Chicago “C” won DII ICT. The sky’s the limit for the Chicago bench.

NORTHEAST: There’s going to be some changes from last year. Harvard graduates a lot of people and probably can no longer expect its B and C teams to soften up opponents, but its A team will only get better. Dartmouth is temporarily off the radar with the loss of its entire starting four. The big story is the crazy influx of good players to Brown, which may actually get better despite losing Top 10 national player Eric. Not only did grad student Dan Klein prove his mettle while playing on the big stage at ACF Nationals this past year, Brown will also benefit from sophomore Michael Wright’s increased participation and the arrival of blue-chip recruits Ian Eppler, Guy Tabachnick, and Ben Cohen. Jerry will have some tough decisions to make about who plays on the A team at the major tournaments, and hopefully will amuse us all by making them in “Glen Jerry Glen Ross” fashion. Whoever ends up on Brown B will find themselves on a team that can contend for high finishes in the second bracket of nationals or possibly for the second spot behind Minnesota in the undergraduate race. Anyway, Harvard and Brown will win all the tournaments held during the year, with MIT usually finishing third, though Brown B could surprise if the full Brown roster is able to show up to the same event that they aren’t editing. Also, Cornell will still be good and Brandeis will be decent, and Doug Yetman will show up to things for CUNY and do fairly well. Yale is poised for a renaissance, as the iron-fisted dictators who were holding the program back have moved on and newly enlightened people have emerged over the summer as both interested in good quizbowl and obviously talented at several major categories. Paired with grad student pickup Kevin Koai, this team will be nearly unstoppable on music and have a great all-around knowledge base to compete for high finishes.

WEST: Stanford loses Kevin, it’s unknown which tournaments Andrew will play, and this team has perhaps suffered the worst among the contenders from West Coast apathy about actually showing up to tournaments with your full team. Nonetheless, they are a threat to win any tournament they go to when the real A-team lineup comes together. I’m pretty sure everyone comes back to Irvine and this is the year they make their push for an NAQT medal spot, and hopefully get the bad taste of 08 ACF Nationals out of their mouths and return to that event as well. UCSD is really a team to watch, as they pulled some huge upsets and laid down great stats last year and are now adding new grad student Chris Chiego. Caltech seems more enthusiastic about attending tournaments than in the recent past, so hopefully along with UCLA and Pomona they will provide a solid field for events in the southern part of the region. Note, events held in SoCal may be jeopardized by an army of high school players occupying the building to re-enact their favorite Dragonball Z episodes; do not be surprised if the stats from NAQT Sectionals California are just a picture of a shirtless guy vibrating for thirty minutes.

NORTHWEST: Mike Bentley reports that Washington, Gonzaga, and Boise State will continue to send teams to most events. The Renaissance of this region as a quizbowl hotspot continues.

SOUTHEAST: South Carolina won everything in this region last year, returns all of its players, and actually cares about good quizbowl, so I predict for them to win 10 events this time. Vanderbilt adds blue-chip recruit Daichi Ueda. Georgia Tech continues to get serious. Clemson has a huge pool of talent to draw from if they can get organized. Florida always seems to do very well when they show up to things, which is not often. Does Georgia return enough good players to do OK? Maybe. I’m not sure who else in this region has a chance at not sucking, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised before.

SOUTHWEST: I think TAMU has already blinked out and the Texas program is seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. The future may belong to Rice, whose reborn program includes not only Henry Gorman, the lead scorer of the double national HS champions, but a bunch of other apparently dedicated people coming out of the Texas circuit. With Angelo having moved on to rainier pastures at Portland State, I’m not sure if Tulsa will continue to glue this region together by hosting eighty-five tournaments a year. Hopefully Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and the Chris Romero cabal can keep things going.

CANADA: Canada is a land of both syrup and contrasts. It’s never been more clear that certain people at Western Ontario and Guelph are ready to make the leap into real quizbowl and are prepared to be competitive right off the bat. At the same time, the older generation has openly declared war on all that is good and made clear that they will fight this ambition until red in tooth and claw. Assuming Peter McCorquodale and Eric Smith don’t build towers on the border and try to machine-gun dissidents as they flee southward to ACF Regionals, expect some Canadian teams to contend for titles here and there over the course of the year, and perhaps for the first Canadian participation in ACF Nationals to materialize.

What will happen at ACF Nationals: I fear for what might happen to the physical location of the tournament if Brown finishes second to Chicago for a fourth straight year, so I’ll play Pangloss and say that, while Seth remains Seth (albeit a Seth whose motivation might be dented by having nothing left to prove), and Shantanu will continue to improve, Jerry and friends will pull it off this time, if for no other reason than that they have to get a favorable finals packet eventually. Minnesota, Illinois and Harvard will fight for third place; whether Minnesota has a chance at upsetting one of the top 2 depends more on how seriously Gautam tries to lock down science and the team as a whole takes advantage of the history gap, than on Brendan’s inevitable continued all-around improvement. Minnesota is a lock for a third straight UG title, with Brown B, VCU, and Carnegie Mellon the likely contenders for the other medal spots there.

Over in the ICT department, Brown takes their usual hit on the NAQT format. Chicago is obviously the huge favorite to be in the final here, with Illinois and Minnesota the likely matchup to determine their opponent. I don’t see Harvard finishing third again; Kyle was a real NAQT beast, which Bruce isn’t, and it’s not like anyone else on this team really cares about NAQT either. It’s Minnesota finally winning the UG gold here, with the same teams as above shooting for the lesser UG trophies. Invoking the principle that Chicago always wins and that Illinois has good NAQT abilities on top of their impressive normal standing, I will predict that ICT ends with Chicago defeating Illinois in the final for the third year out of four.

What’s going on in Division II? Not a lot, since it seems that a great deal of this year’s impressive recruiting class is going to be pressed into service on the A team right off the bat. Let’s say that Rice and Vanderbilt will be the teams led by former high school greats who inevitably lose to the unexpected balanced foursome of recruits from the next tier of HS programs at NAQT DII; last year I said that’s what always happens and indeed it happened again. A Brown B team that is also playing for UG placement would be eligible for ACF DII as well, so I’ll predict they win that. I am assuming such a team would play DI at ICT; if they opt for DII they have a nearly sure shot of winning it. I’m not sure what level Anurag will play at for MIT, but he’s quite good and will either help their A team or make their DII team a contender.

Who will win the CCCT? Northeast Alabama brings back its top scorer, so probably them.

Who will win TRASHionals? Probably some old people who like Maxim a lot. Who will win Mike Bentley’s new trash national? I predict the Chicago team that finished third at TRASHionals last year will capitalize on the better questions and better air quality and pull this one off.

Preseason Top 25:

1. Chicago A
2. Brown A
3. Minnesota
4. Illinois
5. Harvard
6. Irvine
7. MIT
8. Stanford
9. Penn
10. Maryland
11. VCU
12. UCSD
13. Chicago B
14. Iowa
15. Brown B
16. South Carolina
17. Florida
18. Carnegie Mellon
19. Missouri
20. Michigan
21. Columbia
22. Cornell
23. Yale
24. Virginia
25. Chicago C

Last teams out: Swarthmore, Ohio State, Western Ontario, Carleton, Princeton, Toronto
Watch out in six months for: Vanderbilt, Rice, Clemson

We have finally reached the top 10 teams in this ranking.

10. Hoover (AL) – Their team last year went 10-4 and tied for 17th at NAQT’s HSNCT. They return all three players who averaged at least 10 ppg at that tournament – Lowell (41.48 ppg), Patrick (38.43 ppg), and Justin (20.52 ppg). They also averaged 17.45 ppb and 273.4 points per 20 tossups heard, both good for the 14th most in that stat at the 09 HSNCT. With basically their entire team returning, they will be a very tough team.

9. Mission San Jose (CA) – Similar to Hoover, they went 9-5 and tied for 11th at the HSNCT, and have almost all of their A-team returning: Vicky (30.57 ppg), Kirk (28.8), Youngjun (19.69) and Matthew (15.49, in just a bit over three games). They do lose Brian (26.50 ppg), but also have Dawei from their B-team return (38.12). There’s no reason they can’t at least match last year’s performance, if not improve on it.

8. Wilmington Charter (DE) – It might be surprising to see them ranked this highly after losing Henry (73.73 ppg at HSNCT, 165.71 at NSC). However, they return David from their A-team (19.07 at HSNCT, 30.71 at NSC), plus they get Alex (44.08), Billy (18.48) and Meg (15.17) back from their B-team that finished tied for 27th at HSNCT with a 8-5 record with a solid 13.25 ppb. At this point at least, Charter isn’t rebuilding, they’re reloading.

7. Georgetown Day School (DC) – They lose Ian (75.73 ppg at HSNCT, 100 at NSC), which is definitely a big deal. But they return Matt (47.28 at HSNCT, 95 at NSC), plus they had a B-team at NSC that showed some promise, featuring Jordan (34.29 at NSC), Oliver (32.89 at NSC), and Jared (22.86 at NSC). That’s enough to keep them high in the rankings.

6. Southside (SC) – They get Ming (92.86 ppg), Ben (36.43) and Max (12.86) back from their A-team that finished in the top bracket at NSC, plus Amit (40.71) and Neil (35.71) from their B-team at the same event. This is a team that returns a lot of talent and should be a one of the best southern teams in recent memory.

5. LASA (TX) – After finishing tied for 11th at HSNCT, they return all four of their top scorers – Thomas (41.21 ppg), Benji (30.27), Daniel (26.88) and Aaron (21.74). They need to improve their bonus conversion – they had the lowest ppb of any team in the top 16 at HSNCT – but experience and continued work should take care of that.

4. Dorman (SC) – Yes, they lose everyone from the team that finished 8th at PACE NSC and 2nd at NAQT HSNCT. But their entire B-team from those events returns, and that’s a B-team that finished tied for 17th at HSNCT and 21st at NSC. Masuma (30.3 ppg at HSNCT, 53.57 at NSC), Gregory (25.11 at HSNCT, 65.71 at NSC), Mariya (22.94 at HSNCT, 37.14 at NSC), and Sydney (12.73 at HSNCT, 17.86 at NSC) all come back. They should have yet another great year at Dorman.

3. Hunter (NY) – Take the Georgetown Day School situation, replace Ian with Guy (142.14 ppg at NSC) and replace the returning players with even more experienced players, and you have Hunter. They get Lily (30) back from their A-team at NSC, plus York (60), Zihan (42.86), Paul (28.57) and David (28.57) off their B-team at the same event – a B-team that finished 22nd. Even without Guy, Hunter is thriving.

2. State College (PA) – State College returns most of their team that finished 3rd at HSNCT and 2nd at NSC. Without being able to pull much individual information from their HSNCT stats due to usage of pseudonyms, they lose Ben (100 ppg at NSC), but get back Monica (57.86), Graham (55) and David (45.71) from their A-team at NSC, plus have Christopher (62.14) from their B-team at the same tournament. At this point in time, I think there are two teams that would conceivably win a national tournament held this coming weekend, and State College is one of those two teams.

1. Maggie Walker (VA) – They return almost everyone from a team that finished tied for fifth at HSNCT and fourth at NSC. Most notably, their only loss was Matt, who was just their fourth highest scorer. They get back Tommy (43.28 ppg at HSNCT, 95 at NSC), Greg (44.12 at HSNCT, 87.86 at NSC) and Sarah (18.49 at HSNCT, 33.57 at NSC) from their A-team, and get J.R. (52.86) back from their B-team at NSC. I believe that all of this returning firepower earns Maggie Walker the title of the best team in the nation – at this very moment.

Now, there’s a lot that can change over the next nine months, and these rankings are not intended to be predictive for next year’s nationals. There’s entirely too much time for players to improve for me to even pretend I can guess how much better someone can get. I’m also not even trying to rank B-teams at this time, although it would be less than surprising to see a few break into the top 50 by the end of the year.

But there’s officially a forum for you to disagree with me in! Discussion of these rankings are on-going here.

Additionally, the hsquizbowl forums poll is now be conducted. For information on how to vote, go here.

20. Raleigh Charter (NC) – Trivia time: name the highest returning scorer from PACE NSC.

The answer is Raleigh Charter’s Peter, who put up 109.29 ppg at NSC. They also get Gautam’s 17.14 ppg back. This should be enough to be a top team.

19. La Jolla (CA) – They return their entire B-team and half of their A-team from HSNCT (Ben and Alison). Since both teams made the playoffs there, it’s fair to say they’re going to be a force this year.

18. Livingston (NJ) – With two teams going to HSNCT, they get two back from their A-team (Tim, with 29.86 ppg, and David, with 18.48 ppg) and two from their B-team (Govind, with 26.18 ppg, and Saagar, with 18.35). Combined, they should form a talented team.

17. Detroit Country Day (MI) – DCD features the highest returning scorer from the HSNCT, Neil, who averaged 76.34 ppg. Unfortunately, he does not return very much support, so the question is if anyone will improve enough to provide significant help or if Neil will be the only notable threat on this team.

16. duPont Manual (KY) – With 4 players returning who played at NSC and 8 who played at HSNCT, this is a deep and talented team. This include Shray (34.02 ppg at HSNCT, 32.14 at NSC), Vishnu (41.41 at HSNCT), Nick (25.74 at HSNCT, 12.73 at NSC), Meghamsh (14.34 at HSNCT, 22.30 at NSC) and Akshai (11.07 at HSNCT, 30 at NSC). It’s not clear who their top team will consist of, but it should be good.

15. Thomas Jefferson (VA) – One of the deepest programs last year sees that younger talent faced with stepping up to fill numerous holes on their A-team. A top four is not clear, but candidates include Seoup (26.70 ppg at HSNCT, 27.14 at NSC), Arjang (18.10 at HSNCT, 29 at NSC), Stephen (37.14 at NSC), Diana (35 at NSC), Olivia (32.14 at NSC), Siddharth (40.83 at NSC), Peter (28.18 at NSC) and James (24.55 at NSC). They stand a very real chance of vastly improving over this year and making an even bigger impact in the final rankings.

14. Torrey Pines (CA) – They were, essentially, a two-person team at HSNCT, with Stephen (60.99 ppg) and Vivek (33.18 ppg). Fortunately for them, both players return. It’ll be very interesting to see how they progress and if they get any significant assistance from a third (and fourth?) player.

13. Dunbar (KY) – Similar to Thomas Jefferson and duPont Manual, they return a lot of players who performed well at nationals. This includes Idrees (15.05 ppg at HSNCT), Brian (36.41 at HSNCT, 37.38 on NSC A-team), Ping (16.02 at HSNCT, 41.78 on NSC A), Victor (30.71 on NSC A), Sandy (52.86 on NSC B), Ailin (44.29 on NSC B) and Matt (37.78 on NSC B). There’s a lot of potential here.

12. Detroit Catholic Central (MI) – They lose everyone from their team that finished fourth at HSNCT and just one player from their NSC team that finished 13th. But, they return their entire B-team that came within 10 points against St. Viator of making the HSNCT playoffs. This includes Matt (11.67 ppg at NSC, 32.03 at HSNCT), Ryan (30.53 at HSNCT), David (21.89 at HSNCT) and Matt (18.60 at HSNCT). Considering the program they come from and their time spent already playing together as a unit, this team has a lot of potential.

11. Eden Prairie (MN) – Their A-team at HSNCT had everyone average at least 17.87 ppg, and as a team they had 16.12 ppb. They do lose their second highest scorer in Sam (23.53 ppg), but retain Xi, Gaurav, Robin and Neil. They also have Peter returning from their B-team, who averaged 36.84 ppg.

30. Bergen County (NJ) – Watson was a very good player, but with him gone, Bergen will drop down. However, they return three players who scored at least 17 ppg (but no more than 22.28 ppg). Those points aren’t easy to come by alongside a player with 66.23 ppg, either. They also have Dennis from their B team, who put up 30.48 ppg on his own.

29. Parkview Arts & Sciences (AR) – They return Jake, who led their B team into the playoffs at HSNCT with 47.68 ppg. They also get Connor back from their A-team and his 28.84 ppg. Both their teams averaged less than 10 ppb, but this figure should improve if Jake & Connor play on the same team.

28. MLK Magnet (TN) – They get all three of their key players back from HSNCT, being led by Cody (45.25 ppg) and the help of Will (12.22) and Jordan (10.86). Cody should turn into a very good player in his own right, regardless of who his brother is.

27. Solon (OH) – Their key returnee is Jasper and his 32.27 HSNCT ppg, but they also have Benjamin (11.36) and Ashu (10.45) from their A-team, plus Nashonth (22.97) and Partik (17.12) from their B team. Any four from that bunch should form a very solid team.

26. Bellarmine (CA) – Both their A and B team made the playoffs at HSNCT, and they both return notable scorers. Tanay (26.19) and Vinay (15.15) from their A team and Nikhil (21.66), Phil (21.43 – in just 4.5 games) and Ankit (15.67) from their B team return. This team definitely has youth on their side.

25. St. Anselm (DC) – This is based off their performance at NSC, where in four games Aidan averaged 105 ppg and Matt 65. On the one hand, those numbers are awesome. On the other, it was in just four games. On the third hand (pretend I’m Goro), it was in the bottom tier of the consolation rounds after they took over for a team that withdrew. On the fourth hand, putting up those numbers under any circumstances on the NSC set is an accomplishment.

24. Hume-Fogg (TN) – Ian returns, and he put up 60.19 ppg at HSNCT. Sam is also back after putting up 14.81 ppg. Ian’s one of the highest returning scorers from the HSNCT, and that should be enough to get Hume-Fogg a high finish.

23. Pensacola (FL) – David (46.73 ppg @ HSNCT) and Kay (23.83) return from a team with a 14.71 ppb. Depth will be needed for a very deep run at nationals, but as is this is a solid team.

22. Plymouth (MI) – They return their top scorer, by far, from HSNCT in Shan (53.05 ppg), but also get Alan (10.80) and Rebecca (10.33) back. They also had 13.03 ppb, so returning most of the team points to a strong team this year.

21. Northmont (OH) – They get Michael back (13.45 ppg at HSNCT, 40 at NSC) not to mention Brandon (39.56 at HSNCT, 57.14 at NSC). Assuming Michael’s performance at NSC was more indicative of his general ability level, Northmont has a formidable one-two punch. If Michael’s closer to his HSNCT numbers, then they’ll still be notably good.

40. Caesar Rodney (DE) – They return a very committed player in Trey (41.77 ppg at HSNCT, 55.71 at NSC) and Coach Chrzanowski who is one of the most active new coaches around. I’m being conservative with this ranking, as they have a very good chance to jump multiple spots if they continue to improve. The addition of a steady cast around Trey would be key as well.

39. Ransom Everglades (FL) – They return four players who averaged 12 ppg or more at HSNCT, earning them this spot despite the graduation of Jesse and Matthew. Bonus conversion will need work, if the B team’s performance at HSNCT is indicative.

38. Blake (MD) – They return Isaac, who put up 71.54 ppg at NSC on his own. That alone is enough to place him here. A solid supporting cast would push this team even higher.

37. Walt Whitman (MD) – They lose Daniel’s 71.43 ppg from their NSC team, but Douglas’s 76.43 ppg return. He’s also been visible in attempts to improve this summer.

36. Walnut Hills (OH) – Peter’s 24.34 HSNCT ppg are gone, but they get Jon (39.82) and Max (22.06) back. With that much scoring coming back from a team that had a 15.80 ppb, these might be an under-ranking on my part.

35. Kellenberg (NY) – This team’s top two HSNCT players – James (36.41) and Nik (27.65) – are back. They also had 16.69 ppb, which speaks well for their ability to improve.

34. Loyola (IL) – They return a lot of players from the HSNCT team – Nolan (21.18 ppg), Marcel (21.01), and Christian (16.98) from the A team, plus Raman (14.41) from the B team. They also have Will from NSC, who put up 23.64 ppg on their B team at that event. I believe the HSNCT experience will do them well.

33. Chattahoochee (GA) – They lose nearly 80% of their A-team’s scoring at HSNCT, which include Wes, who also put up 112.14 ppg at NSC. They do return Connie (21.56 at HSNCT, 36.43 at NSC) and three players from their B team at HSNCT: Vikram (22.87), Rob (11.38) and Siddharth (10.71).

32. Walton (GA) – They lose Gazi (36.50 ppg at HSNCT, 92.86 ppg at NSC(!)) but return the rest of their A-team. Bouncing back is plausible, but they’ll need someone to step up and fill Gazi’s shoes.

31. Santa Monica (CA) – Their HSNCT team’s scoring was very evenly distributed – their high ppg person was Marino with 26.20, and their low were two players (Carlee and Sky) with 20.09 ppg. They lose Marino, but return Carlee, Sky and Max (24.45). If they can get a fourth to fill out the roster, they should be just as competitive as they were this past year.