The Quizbowl Resource Center

Sponsored by the Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence

Terrapin Open @ Brown on February 29, 2020 Statistics report for Combined

Individual Detail

Individual Detail

	Prelims
	Playoffs
	Final

Alston Boyd, Chicago B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	MIT A	W 410-45	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
2	Harvard A	W 345-145	1.0	1	4	0	20	2.75	—	—	55
3	Columbia A	L 150-365	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	Yale A	W 375-180	1.0	1	5	1	20	3.00	1.00	6.00	60
5	Chicago C+	L 250-300	1.0	2	2	1	20	2.25	2.00	4.00	45
6	Columbia B+	L 200-240	1.0	0	0	3	20	-0.75	0.00	0.00	-15
7	Yale B+	W 320-145	1.0	0	5	1	20	2.25	0.00	5.00	45
8	Harvard B	W 300-175	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
9	South Harmon A	W 345-145	1.0	1	5	0	20	3.25	—	—	65
10	Chicago C+	W 430-175	1.0	2	1	1	20	1.75	2.00	3.00	35
11	Columbia A	W 305-260	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
12	Harvard B	L 120-370	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
	Total		12.0	8	32	10	240	1.63	0.80	4.00	390

Ben Miller, Chicago B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	MIT A	W 410-45	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
2	Harvard A	W 345-145	1.0	1	4	0	20	2.75	—	—	55
3	Columbia A	L 150-365	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
4	Yale A	W 375-180	1.0	3	1	0	20	2.75	—	—	55
5	Chicago C+	L 250-300	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
6	Columbia B+	L 200-240	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
7	Yale B+	W 320-145	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
8	Harvard B	W 300-175	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
9	South Harmon A	W 345-145	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
10	Chicago C+	W 430-175	1.0	3	1	0	20	2.75	—	—	55
11	Columbia A	W 305-260	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
12	Harvard B	L 120-370	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
	Total		12.0	8	21	4	240	1.29	2.00	7.25	310

Grant Li, Chicago B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	MIT A	W 410-45	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
2	Harvard A	W 345-145	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
3	Columbia A	L 150-365	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
4	Yale A	W 375-180	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
5	Chicago C+	L 250-300	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
6	Columbia B+	L 200-240	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
7	Yale B+	W 320-145	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
8	Harvard B	W 300-175	1.0	2	0	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
9	South Harmon A	W 345-145	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
10	Chicago C+	W 430-175	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
11	Columbia A	W 305-260	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
12	Harvard B	L 120-370	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
	Total		12.0	4	18	3	240	0.94	1.33	7.33	225

Tim Morrison, Chicago B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	MIT A	W 410-45	1.0	0	5	0	20	2.50	—	—	50
2	Harvard A	W 345-145	1.0	2	0	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
3	Columbia A	L 150-365	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
4	Yale A	W 375-180	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
5	Chicago C+	L 250-300	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
6	Columbia B+	L 200-240	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
7	Yale B+	W 320-145	1.0	0	5	0	20	2.50	—	—	50
8	Harvard B	W 300-175	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
9	South Harmon A	W 345-145	1.0	0	5	1	20	2.25	0.00	5.00	45
10	Chicago C+	W 430-175	1.0	2	2	0	20	2.50	—	—	50
11	Columbia A	W 305-260	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
12	Harvard B	L 120-370	1.0	0	2	3	20	0.25	0.00	0.67	5
	Total		12.0	8	30	5	240	1.65	1.60	7.60	395

Edgar Lin, Chicago C+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale B+	W 275-135	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
2	Columbia B+	W 325-45	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
3	Harvard B	W 240-200	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	South Harmon A	W 275-210	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
5	Chicago B	W 300-250	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
6	Yale A	W 275-215	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
7	Columbia A	L 190-390	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
8	MIT A	W 305-160	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
9	Harvard A	W 325-145	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
10	Chicago B	L 175-430	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
11	Harvard B	L 210-335	1.0	1	0	1	20	0.50	1.00	1.00	10
12	Columbia A	W 345-180	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
14	Columbia A	L 220-355	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
	Total		13.0	2	11	5	260	0.44	0.40	2.60	115

Halle Friedman, Chicago C+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale B+	W 275-135	1.0	1	3	2	20	1.75	0.50	2.00	35
2	Columbia B+	W 325-45	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
3	Harvard B	W 240-200	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
4	South Harmon A	W 275-210	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
5	Chicago B	W 300-250	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
6	Yale A	W 275-215	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
7	Columbia A	L 190-390	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
8	MIT A	W 305-160	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
9	Harvard A	W 325-145	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
10	Chicago B	L 175-430	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
11	Harvard B	L 210-335	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
12	Columbia A	W 345-180	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
14	Columbia A	L 220-355	1.0	2	2	0	20	2.50	—	—	50
	Total		13.0	6	13	5	260	0.75	1.20	3.80	195

James Lasker, Chicago C+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale B+	W 275-135	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
2	Columbia B+	W 325-45	1.0	2	3	2	20	2.50	1.00	2.50	50
3	Harvard B	W 240-200	1.0	0	3	3	20	0.75	0.00	1.00	15
4	South Harmon A	W 275-210	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
5	Chicago B	W 300-250	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
6	Yale A	W 275-215	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
7	Columbia A	L 190-390	1.0	0	0	2	20	-0.50	0.00	0.00	-10
8	MIT A	W 305-160	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
9	Harvard A	W 325-145	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
10	Chicago B	L 175-430	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
11	Harvard B	L 210-335	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
12	Columbia A	W 345-180	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
14	Columbia A	L 220-355	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
	Total		13.0	7	25	11	260	1.15	0.64	2.91	300

Matthew Lehmann, Chicago C+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale B+	W 275-135	1.0	0	5	2	20	2.00	0.00	2.50	40
2	Columbia B+	W 325-45	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
3	Harvard B	W 240-200	1.0	2	4	2	20	3.00	1.00	3.00	60
4	South Harmon A	W 275-210	1.0	0	6	1	20	2.75	0.00	6.00	55
5	Chicago B	W 300-250	1.0	1	5	0	20	3.25	—	—	65
6	Yale A	W 275-215	1.0	1	7	2	20	3.75	0.50	4.00	75
7	Columbia A	L 190-390	1.0	2	3	2	20	2.50	1.00	2.50	50
8	MIT A	W 305-160	1.0	1	5	1	20	3.00	1.00	6.00	60
9	Harvard A	W 325-145	1.0	1	6	2	20	3.25	0.50	3.50	65
10	Chicago B	L 175-430	1.0	2	3	0	20	3.00	—	—	60
11	Harvard B	L 210-335	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
12	Columbia A	W 345-180	1.0	4	3	0	20	4.50	—	—	90
14	Columbia A	L 220-355	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
	Total		13.0	16	52	14	260	2.65	1.14	4.86	690

Harrison Whitaker, Columbia A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	South Harmon A	W 540-85	1.0	2	0	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
2	Yale B+	W 470-60	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
3	Chicago B	W 365-150	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
4	Harvard B	W 385-160	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
5	Columbia B+	W 350-205	1.0	1	0	1	20	0.50	1.00	1.00	10
6	MIT A	W 400-90	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
7	Chicago C+	W 390-190	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
8	Harvard A	W 395-135	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
9	Yale A	W 320-230	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
10	Harvard B	W 300-245	1.0	1	0	1	20	0.50	1.00	1.00	10
11	Chicago B	L 260-305	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
12	Chicago C+	L 180-345	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
14	Chicago C+	W 355-220	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
	Total		13.0	7	6	6	260	0.52	1.17	2.17	135

Noah Chen, Columbia A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	South Harmon A	W 540-85	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
2	Yale B+	W 470-60	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
3	Chicago B	W 365-150	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
4	Harvard B	W 385-160	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
5	Columbia B+	W 350-205	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
6	MIT A	W 400-90	1.0	2	0	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
7	Chicago C+	W 390-190	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
8	Harvard A	W 395-135	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
9	Yale A	W 320-230	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
10	Harvard B	W 300-245	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
11	Chicago B	L 260-305	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
12	Chicago C+	L 180-345	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
14	Chicago C+	W 355-220	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
	Total		13.0	7	13	2	260	0.87	3.50	10.00	225

Rafael Krichevsky, Columbia A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	South Harmon A	W 540-85	1.0	3	1	1	20	2.50	3.00	4.00	50
2	Yale B+	W 470-60	1.0	1	5	1	20	3.00	1.00	6.00	60
3	Chicago B	W 365-150	1.0	2	3	2	20	2.50	1.00	2.50	50
4	Harvard B	W 385-160	1.0	0	4	2	20	1.50	0.00	2.00	30
5	Columbia B+	W 350-205	1.0	3	2	2	20	2.75	1.50	2.50	55
6	MIT A	W 400-90	1.0	0	4	1	20	1.75	0.00	4.00	35
7	Chicago C+	W 390-190	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
8	Harvard A	W 395-135	1.0	3	2	1	20	3.00	3.00	5.00	60
9	Yale A	W 320-230	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
10	Harvard B	W 300-245	1.0	1	5	1	20	3.00	1.00	6.00	60
11	Chicago B	L 260-305	1.0	1	2	2	20	1.25	0.50	1.50	25
12	Chicago C+	L 180-345	1.0	1	1	2	20	0.75	0.50	1.00	15
14	Chicago C+	W 355-220	1.0	1	2	2	20	1.25	0.50	1.50	25
	Total		13.0	17	36	18	260	2.02	0.94	2.94	525

Will Alston, Columbia A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	South Harmon A	W 540-85	1.0	3	4	2	20	3.75	1.50	3.50	75
2	Yale B+	W 470-60	1.0	2	4	1	20	3.25	2.00	6.00	65
3	Chicago B	W 365-150	1.0	2	2	1	20	2.25	2.00	4.00	45
4	Harvard B	W 385-160	1.0	1	5	0	20	3.25	—	—	65
5	Columbia B+	W 350-205	1.0	2	2	1	20	2.25	2.00	4.00	45
6	MIT A	W 400-90	1.0	3	3	2	20	3.25	1.50	3.00	65
7	Chicago C+	W 390-190	1.0	4	3	2	20	4.00	2.00	3.50	80
8	Harvard A	W 395-135	1.0	3	4	1	20	4.00	3.00	7.00	80
9	Yale A	W 320-230	1.0	1	5	2	20	2.75	0.50	3.00	55
10	Harvard B	W 300-245	1.0	1	1	2	20	0.75	0.50	1.00	15
11	Chicago B	L 260-305	1.0	1	2	2	20	1.25	0.50	1.50	25
12	Chicago C+	L 180-345	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
14	Chicago C+	W 355-220	1.0	2	5	0	20	4.00	—	—	80
	Total		13.0	25	42	16	260	2.75	1.56	4.19	715

Abhinav Godavarthi, Columbia B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard A	L 165-210	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
2	Chicago C+	L 45-325	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
3	Yale A	L 195-215	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
4	MIT A	W 220-140	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
5	Columbia A	L 205-350	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
6	Chicago B	W 240-200	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
7	South Harmon A	L 190-235	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
8	Yale B+	W 200-140	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
9	Harvard B	L 265-315	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
10	South Harmon A	W 235-215	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
12	Yale A	L 210-255	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
	Total		11.0	2	7	7	220	0.30	0.29	1.29	65

Gareth Thorlakson, Columbia B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard A	L 165-210	0.8	0	1	1	15	0.33	0.00	1.00	5
2	Chicago C+	L 45-325	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
3	Yale A	L 195-215	1.0	0	1	2	20	0.00	0.00	0.50	0
4	MIT A	W 220-140	1.0	1	3	1	20	2.00	1.00	4.00	40
5	Columbia A	L 205-350	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
6	Chicago B	W 240-200	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
7	South Harmon A	L 190-235	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
8	Yale B+	W 200-140	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
9	Harvard B	L 265-315	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
10	South Harmon A	W 235-215	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
12	Yale A	L 210-255	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
	Total		10.8	5	15	4	215	0.95	1.25	5.00	205

Gerhardt Hinkle, Columbia B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard A	L 165-210	0.8	0	3	2	15	1.33	0.00	1.50	20
2	Chicago C+	L 45-325	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
3	Yale A	L 195-215	1.0	2	4	0	20	3.50	—	—	70
4	MIT A	W 220-140	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
5	Columbia A	L 205-350	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
6	Chicago B	W 240-200	1.0	3	2	0	20	3.25	—	—	65
7	South Harmon A	L 190-235	1.0	1	4	0	20	2.75	—	—	55
8	Yale B+	W 200-140	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
9	Harvard B	L 265-315	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
10	South Harmon A	W 235-215	1.0	2	3	1	20	2.75	2.00	5.00	55
12	Yale A	L 210-255	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
	Total		10.8	12	30	4	215	2.14	3.00	10.50	460

Michael Kearney, Columbia B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard A	L 165-210	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
2	Chicago C+	L 45-325	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
3	Yale A	L 195-215	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	MIT A	W 220-140	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
5	Columbia A	L 205-350	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
6	Chicago B	W 240-200	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
7	South Harmon A	L 190-235	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
8	Yale B+	W 200-140	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
9	Harvard B	L 265-315	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
10	South Harmon A	W 235-215	1.0	0	2	2	20	0.50	0.00	1.00	10
12	Yale A	L 210-255	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
	Total		11.0	3	17	5	220	0.86	0.60	4.00	190

Hari Dandapani, Harvard A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
7	Yale A	L 235-290	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
	Total		1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0

Kelvin Li, Harvard A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Columbia B+	W 210-165	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
2	Chicago B	L 145-345	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
3	MIT A	W 155-105	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	Yale B+	W 210-145	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
5	Harvard B	L 165-340	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
6	South Harmon A	L 180-185	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
7	Yale A	L 235-290	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
8	Columbia A	L 135-395	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
9	Chicago C+	L 145-325	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
11	Yale B+	L 175-180	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
12	MIT A	L 180-205	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
	Total		11.0	6	12	2	220	0.91	3.00	9.00	200

Michael Yue, Harvard A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Columbia B+	W 210-165	1.0	1	2	2	20	1.25	0.50	1.50	25
2	Chicago B	L 145-345	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
3	MIT A	W 155-105	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
4	Yale B+	W 210-145	1.0	2	1	2	20	1.50	1.00	1.50	30
5	Harvard B	L 165-340	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
6	South Harmon A	L 180-185	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
7	Yale A	L 235-290	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
8	Columbia A	L 135-395	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
9	Chicago C+	L 145-325	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
11	Yale B+	L 175-180	1.0	1	1	2	20	0.75	0.50	1.00	15
12	MIT A	L 180-205	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
	Total		11.0	8	15	10	220	1.00	0.80	2.30	220

Ricky Li, Harvard A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Columbia B+	W 210-165	1.0	0	4	2	20	1.50	0.00	2.00	30
2	Chicago B	L 145-345	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
3	MIT A	W 155-105	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
4	Yale B+	W 210-145	1.0	0	6	1	20	2.75	0.00	6.00	55
5	Harvard B	L 165-340	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
6	South Harmon A	L 180-185	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
7	Yale A	L 235-290	1.0	0	7	1	20	3.25	0.00	7.00	65
8	Columbia A	L 135-395	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
9	Chicago C+	L 145-325	1.0	0	4	1	20	1.75	0.00	4.00	35
11	Yale B+	L 175-180	1.0	0	5	1	20	2.25	0.00	5.00	45
12	MIT A	L 180-205	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
	Total		11.0	1	41	8	220	1.75	0.13	5.25	385

Jason Golfinos, Harvard B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale A	W 300-285 (OT)	1.0	2	4	0	21	3.33	—	—	70
2	South Harmon A	W 400-85	1.0	1	7	1	20	4.00	1.00	8.00	80
3	Chicago C+	L 200-240	1.0	0	4	2	20	1.50	0.00	2.00	30
4	Columbia A	L 160-385	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
5	Harvard A	W 340-165	1.0	5	0	2	20	3.25	2.50	2.50	65
6	Yale B+	W 290-75	1.0	1	3	2	20	1.75	0.50	2.00	35
7	MIT A	W 330-150	1.0	2	5	0	20	4.00	—	—	80
8	Chicago B	L 175-300	1.0	0	3	2	20	1.00	0.00	1.50	20
9	Columbia B+	W 315-265	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
10	Columbia A	L 245-300	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
11	Chicago C+	W 335-210	1.0	2	4	1	20	3.25	2.00	6.00	65
12	Chicago B	W 370-120	1.0	3	5	1	20	4.50	3.00	8.00	90
	Total		12.0	18	42	12	241	2.61	1.50	5.00	630

Laurence Li, Harvard B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale A	W 300-285 (OT)	1.0	1	1	1	21	0.95	1.00	2.00	20
2	South Harmon A	W 400-85	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
3	Chicago C+	L 200-240	1.0	0	2	2	20	0.50	0.00	1.00	10
4	Columbia A	L 160-385	1.0	2	1	2	20	1.50	1.00	1.50	30
5	Harvard A	W 340-165	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
6	Yale B+	W 290-75	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
7	MIT A	W 330-150	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
8	Chicago B	L 175-300	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
9	Columbia B+	W 315-265	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
10	Columbia A	L 245-300	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
11	Chicago C+	W 335-210	1.0	1	4	0	20	2.75	—	—	55
12	Chicago B	W 370-120	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
	Total		12.0	9	22	7	241	1.33	1.29	4.43	320

Mazin Omer, Harvard B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale A	W 300-285 (OT)	1.0	0	2	0	21	0.95	—	—	20
2	South Harmon A	W 400-85	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
3	Chicago C+	L 200-240	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
4	Columbia A	L 160-385	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
5	Harvard A	W 340-165	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
6	Yale B+	W 290-75	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
7	MIT A	W 330-150	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
8	Chicago B	L 175-300	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
9	Columbia B+	W 315-265	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
10	Columbia A	L 245-300	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
11	Chicago C+	W 335-210	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
12	Chicago B	W 370-120	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
	Total		12.0	0	6	4	241	0.17	0.00	1.50	40

Thomas Gioia, Harvard B

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Yale A	W 300-285 (OT)	1.0	0	1	2	21	0.00	0.00	0.50	0
2	South Harmon A	W 400-85	1.0	1	2	0	20	1.75	—	—	35
3	Chicago C+	L 200-240	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	Columbia A	L 160-385	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
5	Harvard A	W 340-165	1.0	1	3	1	20	2.00	1.00	4.00	40
6	Yale B+	W 290-75	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
7	MIT A	W 330-150	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
8	Chicago B	L 175-300	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
9	Columbia B+	W 315-265	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
10	Columbia A	L 245-300	1.0	0	4	1	20	1.75	0.00	4.00	35
11	Chicago C+	W 335-210	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
12	Chicago B	W 370-120	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
	Total		12.0	3	22	5	241	1.00	0.60	5.00	240

David Do, MIT A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago B	L 45-410	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
2	Yale A	L 130-310	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
3	Harvard A	L 105-155	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
4	Columbia B+	L 140-220	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
5	South Harmon A	W 260-210	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
6	Columbia A	L 90-400	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
7	Harvard B	L 150-330	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
8	Chicago C+	L 160-305	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
9	Yale B+	W 375-125	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
10	Yale B+	W 255-220	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
12	Harvard A	W 205-180	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
	Total		11.0	0	7	1	220	0.30	0.00	7.00	65

David Gomez, MIT A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago B	L 45-410	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
2	Yale A	L 130-310	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
3	Harvard A	L 105-155	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	Columbia B+	L 140-220	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
5	South Harmon A	W 260-210	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
6	Columbia A	L 90-400	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
7	Harvard B	L 150-330	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
8	Chicago C+	L 160-305	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
9	Yale B+	W 375-125	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
10	Yale B+	W 255-220	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
12	Harvard A	W 205-180	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
	Total		11.0	0	7	3	220	0.25	0.00	2.33	55

Grace Liu, MIT A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago B	L 45-410	1.0	1	2	4	20	0.75	0.25	0.75	15
2	Yale A	L 130-310	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
3	Harvard A	L 105-155	1.0	0	4	1	20	1.75	0.00	4.00	35
4	Columbia B+	L 140-220	1.0	1	3	1	20	2.00	1.00	4.00	40
5	South Harmon A	W 260-210	1.0	1	4	2	20	2.25	0.50	2.50	45
6	Columbia A	L 90-400	1.0	1	1	2	20	0.75	0.50	1.00	15
7	Harvard B	L 150-330	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
8	Chicago C+	L 160-305	1.0	3	1	0	20	2.75	—	—	55
9	Yale B+	W 375-125	1.0	3	4	1	20	4.00	3.00	7.00	80
10	Yale B+	W 255-220	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
12	Harvard A	W 205-180	1.0	2	2	0	20	2.50	—	—	50
	Total		11.0	12	29	11	220	1.89	1.09	3.73	415

Swapnil Garg, MIT A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago B	L 45-410	1.0	0	1	3	20	-0.25	0.00	0.33	-5
2	Yale A	L 130-310	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
3	Harvard A	L 105-155	1.0	0	1	2	20	0.00	0.00	0.50	0
4	Columbia B+	L 140-220	1.0	0	2	4	20	0.00	0.00	0.50	0
5	South Harmon A	W 260-210	1.0	1	3	2	20	1.75	0.50	2.00	35
6	Columbia A	L 90-400	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
7	Harvard B	L 150-330	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
8	Chicago C+	L 160-305	1.0	0	3	3	20	0.75	0.00	1.00	15
9	Yale B+	W 375-125	1.0	0	6	1	20	2.75	0.00	6.00	55
10	Yale B+	W 255-220	1.0	2	1	1	20	1.75	2.00	3.00	35
12	Harvard A	W 205-180	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
	Total		11.0	4	27	18	220	1.09	0.22	1.72	240

Darren Petrosino, South Harmon A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Columbia A	L 85-540	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
2	Harvard B	L 85-400	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
3	Yale B+	W 265-105	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
4	Chicago C+	L 210-275	1.0	0	2	2	20	0.50	0.00	1.00	10
5	MIT A	L 210-260	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
6	Harvard A	W 185-180	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
7	Columbia B+	W 235-190	1.0	0	3	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
8	Yale A	L 170-305	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
9	Chicago B	L 145-345	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
10	Columbia B+	L 215-235	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
11	Yale A	L 195-200	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
	Total		11.0	0	15	5	220	0.57	0.00	3.00	125

Doug Simons, South Harmon A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Columbia A	L 85-540	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
2	Harvard B	L 85-400	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
3	Yale B+	W 265-105	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
4	Chicago C+	L 210-275	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
5	MIT A	L 210-260	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
6	Harvard A	W 185-180	1.0	2	1	1	20	1.75	2.00	3.00	35
7	Columbia B+	W 235-190	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
8	Yale A	L 170-305	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
9	Chicago B	L 145-345	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
10	Columbia B+	L 215-235	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
11	Yale A	L 195-200	1.0	2	1	1	20	1.75	2.00	3.00	35
	Total		11.0	7	10	5	220	0.82	1.40	3.40	180

Isaac Kirk-Davidoff, South Harmon A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Columbia A	L 85-540	1.0	0	2	3	20	0.25	0.00	0.67	5
2	Harvard B	L 85-400	1.0	1	0	2	20	0.25	0.50	0.50	5
3	Yale B+	W 265-105	1.0	1	3	1	20	2.00	1.00	4.00	40
4	Chicago C+	L 210-275	1.0	2	2	0	20	2.50	—	—	50
5	MIT A	L 210-260	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
6	Harvard A	W 185-180	1.0	0	0	2	20	-0.50	0.00	0.00	-10
7	Columbia B+	W 235-190	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
8	Yale A	L 170-305	1.0	2	1	1	20	1.75	2.00	3.00	35
9	Chicago B	L 145-345	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
10	Columbia B+	L 215-235	1.0	2	1	1	20	1.75	2.00	3.00	35
11	Yale A	L 195-200	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
	Total		11.0	11	16	13	220	1.18	0.85	2.08	260

Victor Pavao, South Harmon A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Columbia A	L 85-540	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
2	Harvard B	L 85-400	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
3	Yale B+	W 265-105	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
4	Chicago C+	L 210-275	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
5	MIT A	L 210-260	1.0	2	1	1	20	1.75	2.00	3.00	35
6	Harvard A	W 185-180	1.0	1	3	1	20	2.00	1.00	4.00	40
7	Columbia B+	W 235-190	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
8	Yale A	L 170-305	1.0	1	0	1	20	0.50	1.00	1.00	10
9	Chicago B	L 145-345	1.0	0	2	2	20	0.50	0.00	1.00	10
10	Columbia B+	L 215-235	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
11	Yale A	L 195-200	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
	Total		11.0	6	19	9	220	1.07	0.67	2.78	235

Daniel Ma, Yale A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard B	L 285-300 (OT)	1.0	0	1	1	21	0.24	0.00	1.00	5
2	MIT A	W 310-130	1.0	1	4	1	20	2.50	1.00	5.00	50
3	Columbia B+	W 215-195	1.0	0	1	2	20	0.00	0.00	0.50	0
4	Chicago B	L 180-375	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
5	Yale B+	W 375-45	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
6	Chicago C+	L 215-275	1.0	0	0	2	20	-0.50	0.00	0.00	-10
7	Harvard A	W 290-235	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
8	South Harmon A	W 305-170	1.0	1	0	2	20	0.25	0.50	0.50	5
9	Columbia A	L 230-320	1.0	0	1	2	20	0.00	0.00	0.50	0
11	South Harmon A	W 200-195	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
12	Columbia B+	W 255-210	1.0	1	0	1	20	0.50	1.00	1.00	10
	Total		11.0	5	17	13	221	0.81	0.38	1.69	180

Daniel Sheinberg, Yale A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard B	L 285-300 (OT)	1.0	0	3	0	21	1.43	—	—	30
2	MIT A	W 310-130	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
3	Columbia B+	W 215-195	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	Chicago B	L 180-375	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
5	Yale B+	W 375-45	1.0	0	1	3	20	-0.25	0.00	0.33	-5
6	Chicago C+	L 215-275	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
7	Harvard A	W 290-235	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
8	South Harmon A	W 305-170	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
9	Columbia A	L 230-320	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
11	South Harmon A	W 200-195	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
12	Columbia B+	W 255-210	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
	Total		11.0	3	11	6	221	0.57	0.50	2.33	125

Hasna Karim, Yale A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard B	L 285-300 (OT)	1.0	0	2	0	21	0.95	—	—	20
2	MIT A	W 310-130	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
3	Columbia B+	W 215-195	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
4	Chicago B	L 180-375	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
5	Yale B+	W 375-45	1.0	1	1	1	20	1.00	1.00	2.00	20
6	Chicago C+	L 215-275	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
7	Harvard A	W 290-235	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
8	South Harmon A	W 305-170	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
9	Columbia A	L 230-320	1.0	0	2	2	20	0.50	0.00	1.00	10
11	South Harmon A	W 200-195	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
12	Columbia B+	W 255-210	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
	Total		11.0	1	13	7	221	0.50	0.14	2.00	110

Stephen Eltinge, Yale A

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Harvard B	L 285-300 (OT)	1.0	1	3	1	21	1.90	1.00	4.00	40
2	MIT A	W 310-130	1.0	1	4	1	20	2.50	1.00	5.00	50
3	Columbia B+	W 215-195	1.0	2	2	1	20	2.25	2.00	4.00	45
4	Chicago B	L 180-375	1.0	0	3	2	20	1.00	0.00	1.50	20
5	Yale B+	W 375-45	1.0	4	4	1	20	4.75	4.00	8.00	95
6	Chicago C+	L 215-275	1.0	1	3	1	20	2.00	1.00	4.00	40
7	Harvard A	W 290-235	1.0	1	4	1	20	2.50	1.00	5.00	50
8	South Harmon A	W 305-170	1.0	1	8	0	20	4.75	—	—	95
9	Columbia A	L 230-320	1.0	3	2	0	20	3.25	—	—	65
11	South Harmon A	W 200-195	1.0	1	2	1	20	1.50	1.00	3.00	30
12	Columbia B+	W 255-210	1.0	2	4	1	20	3.25	2.00	6.00	65
	Total		11.0	17	39	10	221	2.69	1.70	5.60	595

Andrew Verdesca, Yale B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago C+	L 135-275	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
2	Columbia A	L 60-470	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
3	South Harmon A	L 105-265	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
4	Harvard A	L 145-210	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
5	Yale A	L 45-375	1.0	0	2	1	20	0.75	0.00	2.00	15
6	Harvard B	L 75-290	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
7	Chicago B	L 145-320	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
8	Columbia B+	L 140-200	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
9	MIT A	L 125-375	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
10	MIT A	L 220-255	1.0	1	1	0	20	1.25	—	—	25
11	Harvard A	W 180-175	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
	Total		11.0	3	10	4	220	0.57	0.75	3.25	125

Cole Snedeker, Yale B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago C+	L 135-275	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
2	Columbia A	L 60-470	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
3	South Harmon A	L 105-265	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
4	Harvard A	L 145-210	1.0	0	0	2	20	-0.50	0.00	0.00	-10
5	Yale A	L 45-375	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
6	Harvard B	L 75-290	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
7	Chicago B	L 145-320	1.0	1	0	0	20	0.75	—	—	15
8	Columbia B+	L 140-200	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
9	MIT A	L 125-375	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
10	MIT A	L 220-255	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
11	Harvard A	W 180-175	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
	Total		11.0	1	4	5	220	0.14	0.20	1.00	30

Conor Thompson, Yale B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago C+	L 135-275	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
2	Columbia A	L 60-470	1.0	2	0	0	20	1.50	—	—	30
3	South Harmon A	L 105-265	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
4	Harvard A	L 145-210	1.0	0	4	0	20	2.00	—	—	40
5	Yale A	L 45-375	1.0	0	0	2	20	-0.50	0.00	0.00	-10
6	Harvard B	L 75-290	1.0	0	4	2	20	1.50	0.00	2.00	30
7	Chicago B	L 145-320	1.0	1	2	2	20	1.25	0.50	1.50	25
8	Columbia B+	L 140-200	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
9	MIT A	L 125-375	1.0	0	3	1	20	1.25	0.00	3.00	25
10	MIT A	L 220-255	1.0	2	3	0	20	3.00	—	—	60
11	Harvard A	W 180-175	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
	Total		11.0	5	27	8	220	1.39	0.63	4.00	305

Varun Sikand, Yale B+

Rd.	Opponent	Result	GP	15	10	-5	TUH	PPTUH	Pwr/N	G/N	Pts
1	Chicago C+	L 135-275	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
2	Columbia A	L 60-470	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
3	South Harmon A	L 105-265	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
4	Harvard A	L 145-210	1.0	0	2	0	20	1.00	—	—	20
5	Yale A	L 45-375	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
6	Harvard B	L 75-290	1.0	0	0	0	20	0.00	—	—	0
7	Chicago B	L 145-320	1.0	0	1	1	20	0.25	0.00	1.00	5
8	Columbia B+	L 140-200	1.0	1	2	2	20	1.25	0.50	1.50	25
9	MIT A	L 125-375	1.0	0	1	0	20	0.50	—	—	10
10	MIT A	L 220-255	1.0	0	0	1	20	-0.25	0.00	0.00	-5
11	Harvard A	W 180-175	1.0	1	3	0	20	2.25	—	—	45
	Total		11.0	2	11	5	220	0.52	0.40	2.60	115

Made with YellowFruit 🍌