Walton Tournament Results

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.

Walton Tournament Results

Postby steven-lamp » Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:33 pm

Does anyone have them? LAMP went but we lost in the round of 32 by 10 points on a squirley recognition thing on the last question. Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone knows the outcome of that tournament, as the field was quite large and strong (80 teams). I know DuPont A was ranked 1 out of the prelims.
User avatar
steven-lamp
Amazon of buried jaguars
 
Posts: 699
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 7:42 pm
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL

Postby somerandomguy » Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:38 pm

1. Dorman
2. Irmo

Semi-finalists: Ezell-Harding and Dupont
somerandomguy
potter wasted among his clays
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 10:48 pm

Postby irmogopher » Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:40 pm

I thought Brookwood was ranked first coming into the playoffs, at least, I'm pretty sure they were at the top of the bracket.
irmogopher
mason high on your treacherous scaffolding
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 12:59 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Postby somerandomguy » Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:41 pm

yeah, out of prelims Brookwood had 2020, Dorman had 2010, and Dupont had 2000 total points
somerandomguy
potter wasted among his clays
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 10:48 pm

Postby Matt Weiner » Sun Oct 03, 2004 8:06 pm

Please submit results to the database.
User avatar
Matt Weiner
Administrator
 
Posts: 7307
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Walton Tournament Results

Postby stasa » Sun Oct 03, 2004 10:26 pm

steven-lamp wrote:LAMP went but we lost in the round of 32 by 10 points on a squirley recognition thing on the last question.


Apparently, everyone is losing nowadays due to some "squirley" thing in the last question. No longer does an opposing teams greater skill have anything to do with a loss. Seriously, I'm getting tired of all the excuses that people give for their failure. Maybe next time you can own up to a loss like a man and not add any modifying statements.
stasa
potter wasted among his clays
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 12:35 am

Postby edd » Sun Oct 03, 2004 10:49 pm

Apparently, everyone is losing nowadays due to some "squirley" thing in the last question. No longer does an opposing teams greater skill have anything to do with a loss. Seriously, I'm getting tired of all the excuses that people give for their failure. Maybe next time you can own up to a loss like a man and not add any modifying statements.


I was the one that screwed LAMP over alright! I buzzed in and said Klu Klux Klan before the reader got a chance to finish saying yellow 4. The answer was right, but it was non-resposive. Thats how we lost, my fault. But stupid none the less
User avatar
edd
potter wasted among his clays
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 10:41 pm

Postby PatWalton » Sun Oct 03, 2004 11:03 pm

Dupont and Ezell Harding were semifinalists
Dorman got 1st and Irmo got 2nd
PatWalton
emerge from subterranean time
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:00 pm

Postby quizbowlmike » Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:31 am

non-responsive should not be a rule in quizbowl. if your light is on, you should be able to answer.
User avatar
quizbowlmike
mason high on your treacherous scaffolding
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 2:16 pm
Location: Gainesville, FL

Postby mujason » Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:58 am

Yeah, that's how ACF, NAQT, and TRASH do it. However, CBI and most high school competitions still require recognition.
mujason
mason high on your treacherous scaffolding
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 12:47 am
Location: Missouri


Return to High school area archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest