Kwang the Ninja wrote:In Chrome it justs negs you every time you buzz in.
perlnerd666 wrote:EDIT: I like it a lot, but it's a tiny bit clunky. In particular, the 15-second no-chat delay is a little irritating.
perlnerd666 wrote:That reminds me; I liked the old system of typing buzz and then typing the answer better—this is a typing speed contest too, which is hard under pressure.
whaatt wrote:perlnerd666 wrote:EDIT: I like it a lot, but it's a tiny bit clunky. In particular, the 15-second no-chat delay is a little irritating.
For the synchronization between users to occur properly, I need this delay. However, it can be as long or short as I want. Would you rather a 3 or 5 second delay? That's something I can literally edit in two minutes and change.

perlnerd666 wrote:EDIT: I like it a lot, but it's a tiny bit clunky. In particular, the 15-second no-chat delay is a little irritating.
That reminds me; I liked the old system of typing buzz and then typing the answer better—this is a typing speed contest too, which is hard under pressure.
whaatt wrote:perlnerd666 wrote:EDIT: I like it a lot, but it's a tiny bit clunky. In particular, the 15-second no-chat delay is a little irritating.
That reminds me; I liked the old system of typing buzz and then typing the answer better—this is a typing speed contest too, which is hard under pressure.
Done and done! Tell me if anything glitches up, and sorry for the downtime earlier today.
Olivaceous Siskin wrote:whaatt wrote:perlnerd666 wrote:EDIT: I like it a lot, but it's a tiny bit clunky. In particular, the 15-second no-chat delay is a little irritating.
That reminds me; I liked the old system of typing buzz and then typing the answer better—this is a typing speed contest too, which is hard under pressure.
Done and done! Tell me if anything glitches up, and sorry for the downtime earlier today.
It's not working for me right now (Firefox).
whaatt wrote:perlnerd666 wrote:EDIT: I like it a lot, but it's a tiny bit clunky. In particular, the 15-second no-chat delay is a little irritating.
That reminds me; I liked the old system of typing buzz and then typing the answer better—this is a typing speed contest too, which is hard under pressure.
Done and done! Tell me if anything glitches up, and sorry for the downtime earlier today.
Qub wrote:"The server has not connected with you.
This may be due to a lack of browser support.
Please try the newest version of a modern browser (not IE).
Alternately, the server may be down temporarily.
Please wait a few minutes and then try again.
perlnerd666 wrote:whaatt wrote:perlnerd666 wrote:EDIT: I like it a lot, but it's a tiny bit clunky. In particular, the 15-second no-chat delay is a little irritating.
For the synchronization between users to occur properly, I need this delay. However, it can be as long or short as I want. Would you rather a 3 or 5 second delay? That's something I can literally edit in two minutes and change.
Personally, I like 3 seconds, but I'm sure there are some dissenting opinions.
Olivaceous Siskin wrote:Some kind of /who function would be great, too.
perlnerd666 wrote:I love this interface but I'm noticing that it's very easy and common to get "locked out" when trying to join.
jabekens wrote:A few teammates told me about this just a minute ago, so I opened the link to try it out. I am using Chrome, and I made sure it was up-to-date. Upon clicking the link, the interface tells me that the Client Disconnected. Refreshing did not help. My friend said that he is currently on, so the server is clearly not down. I opened Opera and made sure it was up-to-date. This time, upon opening the page, the interface told me there was an error, and the same thing showed up each time I refreshed. I then tried Firefox. After updating it because I have not used it in months, I tried opening the page. It gave the me same message as when I tried with Chrome. Is something just wrong with my computer or the internet connection I have? I honestly have no clue what is wrong. Thanks.
merv1618 wrote:Is there a way to start a private bowl room?
whaatt wrote:merv1618 wrote:Is there a way to start a private bowl room?
Not yet, but if I'm feeling particularly motivated, I might add it tonight. Otherwise it shouldn't be too long before I do.
blizzard wrote:I have the newest version of Chrome,and whenever I get on, it says offline. I have tried this for the past week or so and every time it says it is offline. i am not sure what (if anything) I can do to try and fix it.
msbg360 wrote:Thanks Sanjay the program seems to be working really well.
haddiman wrote:I was curious if this only uses high school questions or if some college packets are incorporated as well.
haddiman wrote:But, if it's not too much of a pain in the ass, it'd be nice to have rooms with different difficulties.
Question Category:
Question Source:
Tournament Year:Paula Pareto Optimality wrote:I used this earlier this evening, and it worked fine. But when I got on now I got through the prompts up until I had to type in "next", in which this appeared in blue text:
- Code: Select all
Question Category:
Question Source:
Tournament Year:
I can't type in the text box, hit enter or anything. Any ideas?
niccalis wrote:Whenever I try to join a game it says I need a nickname?
User was reminded to enable a signature.
Paula Pareto Optimality wrote:Some of my team mates were curious if there was a way for Qub to have an alternative source of questions, for when Sharad's program doesn't work. Is this possible?
Return to Databases and Quizbowl Software
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests