Collegiate Quizbowl 2018-2019 Season Preview

Acknowledgements are due to Naveed Chowdhury for editing and contributing to this writeup.

NOTE: All projected lineups are obviously subject to change over the course of the season. A degree of uncertainty about each lineup should be assumed, even where not indicated.

  1. Chicago Maroons (Alston Boyd, Matthew Lehmann, John Lawrence, Kai Smith), 322, highest #1, lowest #2

Unless a major upset happens, with the absence of Jacob Reed Chicago seems on pace to repeat their 2018 ACF Nationals championship. They lose history specialist Jason Zhou, but that loss should be more than made up for by the addition of literature-focused generalist and noted study fiend Matthew Lehmann. Kai Smith will continue to provide much-needed science support to top scorer John Lawrence, and this team will find itself in the unique position of having four very good literature players. History coverage is a concern; watch for how well Lehmann can provide it.


  1. Yale Bulldogs (Jacob Reed, Moses Kitakule, Stephen Eltinge, Adam Fine), 315, highest #1, lowest #2

Yale enters this year as tentative favorites to repeat their victory at ICT, but probable best active player in quizbowl Jacob Reed’s likely absence from ACF Nationals will weaken Yale there. While the loss of Isaac Kirk-Davidoff will be deeply felt, Yale will replace him with religion and literature specialist Moses Kitakule. This team’s ability to repeat their ICT title may depend on Stephen Eltinge’s ability to fill the gap Kirk-Davidoff’s departure left on NAQT categories. Eltinge and Adam Fine will likely continue to put up excellent numbers on science, so even without Reed, Yale retains top-bracket potential.


  1. Ohio State Buckeyes (Chris Ray, Clark Smith, Enoch Fu, Aakash Singh), 297, highest #3, lowest #5

After the arrival of Chris Ray in 2016-17, Ohio State became a quizbowl powerhouse with the addition of thought, religion, and literature-focused wunderkind Clark Smith. With additional support from science player Enoch Fu, this team is well-positioned to upset either team above it for a national title.


  1. Maryland Terrapins (Caleb Kendrick, Justin Hawkins, Graham Reid, Weijia Cheng), 277, highest #3, lowest #7

After two shock top-bracket finishes at ICT and ACF Nationals last year, Maryland is being inundated by a tsunami of new talent. Foremost among this new class of recruits is Caleb Kendrick, formerly of the University of Oklahoma. Kendrick’s arrival brings a new literature-focused generalist to College Park, where he will add his talents to those of lockdown religion player and history-focused generalist Weijia Cheng, literature specialist Justin Hawkins, and excellent science player Graham Reid. A concern, however, will be physics specialist Reid’s lack of coverage in biology. This team’s ability to compete with those above it may depend on how well Kendrick meshes with his new support, but this year’s iteration of Maryland has a definite chance to recapture its Brownsteinian glory days.


  1. Minnesota Golden Gophers (Geoff Chen, Sam Bailey, Shan Kothari, Brian Kalathiveetil or John Waldron), 264, highest #4, lowest #8

Minnesota’s loss of Jason Asher marks one of the first changes in their core lineup since 2014. They still, however, retain the eclectic knowledge bases of Sam Bailey and Shan Kothari and add science prodigy Geoffrey Chen, who has a proven ability to scale to Nats difficulty in a way that has been difficult for Minnesota teams in the past. Their lineup may be rounded out by additional science support from John Waldron or generalism from Brian Kalathiveetil. This team is likely just out of contention for a title, but watch for a deep run at either nationals.


  1. California Golden Bears (Four of: Rahul Keyal, Justin Nghiem, Bruce Lou, Rohin Devanathan, Eric Chen, Michael Coates), 263, highest #4, lowest #7

While the graduation of top-5 player Aseem Keyal will likely mean a slight hit to Berkeley’s strength from 2018, Berkeley’s phenomenal B team provides no shortage of talent to replace him. Aseem’s brother, Rahul, was a standout on that B team, with a similar focus on literature. NAQT specialist Michael Coates and historian Eric Chen would both, however, be solid choices to round out Berkeley A. Whoever it is that ends up joining Bruce Lou, who is perhaps the best active history player in the game, and literature specialist Justin Nghiem, this Berkeley team should not be underestimated.


  1. Columbia Lions (Rafael Krichevsky, Ben Zhang, Gerhardt Hinkle, Daniel Shao) , 254, highest #4, lowest #12

Columbia’s team for the coming year will continue to be anchored by quietly excellent science-focused generalist Rafael Krichevsky. Ben Zhang will be returning for a fifth year of collegiate quizbowl eligibility; although he never reached the heights that might have been imagined for him from his illustrious high school career, he retains the ability to contribute at the collegiate level.


  1. Michigan State Spartans (Jakob Myers, Harris Bunker, Erik Bubolz, Evan Suttell), 208, highest #6, lowest #15

This team loses science specialist Tony Incorvati from its 2018 ICT lineup. Jakob Myers’ rapid development as a generalist and top-flight history player should continue from last year, as should Evan Suttell’s emergence as a solid arts and literature-focused second scorer, especially in the Other Fine Arts distribution. This team is rounded out by Music and mythology specialist Erik Bubolz and Harris Bunker. Key questions, however, remain around this team after its disappointing 28th place finish at ACF nationals, especially surrounding its lack of science coverage and tendency toward crippling negs. MSU will, however, remain an unpredictable team with the potential to upset those above it on this list.


  1. Johns Hopkins Blue Jays (Robert Chu, Eric Bobrow, Walter Zhao, Seth Ebner), 191, highest #9, lowest #14

Last year, tournaments in the mid-Atlantic were defined by a three-way rivalry for second place behind Penn between Maryland, Virginia, and Johns Hopkins. With Maryland’s addition of Caleb Kendrick, the Terrapins may be the clear best team in the region, but the Blue Jays are a fairly unambiguous second. JHU loses only its third scorer, Noah Stanco, and retains its dynamic scientist duo of medical student Robert Chu and physicist and music expert Eric Bobrow. Stanco will be replaced by Walter Zhao, formerly of JHU’s underrated B team. A strong finish at ACF Nationals last year demonstrated that Chu and Bobrow have the ability to scale their game to high levels of difficulty, but it remains to be seen whether this team will be held back by the demanding academic load of its players.


  1. McGill Redmen (Derek So, Joe Su, Akhil Garg, Daniel Lovsted), 189, highest #8, ranked by 12 voters

McGill’s team will be led by generalist Derek So, with support from science and music specialist Joe Su and science specialist Akhil Garg. History player Daniel Lovsted will prove crucial, since history is Derek’s main weakness. Look for McGill to improve on its 2018 finishes, already among the best ever for a Canadian team.


  1. Florida Gators (Tracy Mirkin, Jonathen Settle, Taylor Harvey, Alex Shaw), 181, highest #8, lowest #18

Florida will retain all of last year’s A team, whose strong commitment to improving quickly made them a formidable opponent by Nationals and will likely make them even more formidable going forward. Taylor Harvey has emerged in the last year as one of the country’s best players, and he’ll receive ample backup from sophomore history player Tracy Mirkin, fresh from a breakout freshman year. Literature player Alex Shaw and science specialist Jonathen Settle complete the lineup.


  1. California Golden Bears B (Four of: James Malouf, Pranav Sivakumar, John Xiang, Jeffrey Qiu, Eric Chen, Michael Coates, Rohin Devanathan), 177, highest #7, ranked by 12 voters

Berkeley has a plethora of options for its high-performing B team this year. Those options include history specialists James Malouf and Eric Chen, science player and musician Pranav Sivakumar, freshman Jeffrey Qiu (the top scorer from last year’s formidable Canyon Crest Academy team), NAQT specialist Michael Coates, and Ohioans John Xiang and Rohin Devanathan. Regardless of which of these Berkeley B teams plays nationals this year, however, they should be on pace for a solid finish.


  1. Pennsylvania Quakers (Jaimie Carlson, Nitin Rao, Aidan Mehigan, Paul Lee), 150, highest #9, lowest #20

Eric Mukherjee and JinAh Kim depart from last year’s Nats runner-up Penn team, but literature-focused generalist Jaimie Carlson should be able to keep the Quakers competitive. A question mark surrounding this team is whether or how much grad student Aidan Mehigan will continue playing, given his concurrent duties as a high school teacher, but history specialist Nitin Rao and science player Paul Lee should provide a strong supporting cast regardless.


  1. Virginia Cavaliers (Jack Mehr, Eric Xu, Nick Collins, Lawrence Simon), 141, highest #9, lowest #21

This coming year, Virginia will undergo a rare change in its lineup as history specialist Vasa Clarke departs for law school; in his place, however, Virginia will get to bring back a familiar face, as Jack Mehr returns from a year off. Eric Xu will continue to provide the bulk of this team’s scoring, with support from literature specialist Mehr and arts and literature-focused generalist Nick Collins, the only graduate student on this team. Eric graduates after this year, so this may be this generation of Virginians’ last chance to make their mark.


  1. Washington (Mo.) Bears (Charles Hang, Lily Hamer, Cyrus Zhou, Alex Newman) , 131, highest #9, ranked by 11 voters

2019 will be Charles Hang’s last year with a team that he’s grown to define over his 10-year career at WUSTL. For that last year, he is joined by literature specialist Lily Hamer as well as history, art, and biology specialist Alex Newman and science player Cyrus Zhou. WUSTL should improve on last year’s ACF Nationals finish, in which they led the 3rd bracket due to a prelim bracketing mishap.


  1. Oxford Dark Blues (Oliver Clarke, Alexander Peplow, George Charlson, Jacob Robertson), 120, highest #8, lowest #23

After Cambridge’s loss of Jason Golfinos, Oxford will likely regain the upper hand on the British circuit. While they lose their top scorer, Daoud Jackson, Oxford gains history and geography specialist and terrifying classics player Oliver Clarke and retains Physicist and science specialist Jacob Robertson, George Charlson, and Alex Peplow, who has an eclectic knowledge base in history and “dour British lit”. Oxford remains a team to watch from across the pond.


  1. Chicago Maroons B (Four of: John Marvin, Halle Friedman, Tim Morrison, Samir Khan, Olivia Kiser, James Lasker), 116, highest #10, ranked by 12 voters

While Chicago B loses most of both its ICT and its Nats lineups to A-team promotion and graduation, the Chicago program’s incredible depth will have no trouble furnishing an excellent B team. Candidates for that team include science specialist and Astrophysics PhD student James Lasker, Boston College transplant John Marvin, arts specialist Halle Friedman, generalist Tim Morrison, science player Samir Khan, and history-focused player Olivia Kiser. It remains to be seen what kind of team these disparate elements will produce, but Chicago’s B team looks set to continue its tradition of excellence.


  1. Northwestern Wildcats (Adam Silverman, Anthony Wang, Jack Drummond, Alex Banta, possibly Dillon Edwards), 114, highest #11, ranked by 11 voters

The exit of Greg Peterson means that Northwestern retains an excellent generalist and peerless science player in Adam Silverman, but very little in the way of support for him. Peterson will be joined by Michigan State alum Dillon Edwards, as well as three younger players. Silverman has worked with diminished support before during his undergrad years at Georgia Tech and has improved significantly since then, but whether he’ll be able to replicate Northwestern’s performances of seasons past without as much support is very much an open question.


  1. Stanford Cardinal (Natan Holtzman, Marianna Zhang, Ashwin Ramaswami, Ali Saeed), 111, highest #11, ranked by 12 voters

Stanford’s team this coming year will likely be led by two newly-arrived graduate students: arts-focused generalist Natan Holtzman, formerly of North Carolina, and Chicago alumna Marianna Zhang. With the losses of its entire Division 1 ICT lineup, Stanford’s team will likely be completed by two sophomores, both of whom are former high school superstars who played D2 last year: underrated science specialist Ashwin Ramaswami and literature player Ali Saeed (or possibly arts specialist Young Fenimore Lee). With a complete turnover from its ICT lineup last year, Stanford remains something of a question mark, but an improvement on their 16th place finish at that tournament isn’t outside the realm of possibility.


  1. Toronto Varsity Blues (Zhenglin Liu, Rein Otsason, Paul Kasinski, Chris Sims), 89, highest #13, lowest #25

Toronto’s leading scorer in the coming year will likely be Canada’s best science player, Rein Otsason. Rein will receive support from music specialist Zhenglin Liu, history player Paul Kasinski, and Chris Sims. It remains to be seen, however, whether this team can improve on its disappointing ACF Nationals finish without Aayush Rajasekaran’s literature coverage or its ICT finish without history elder statesman Jay Misuk, both of whom will play this year on lower Toronto teams.


  1. Texas Longhorns (Jaskaran Singh, Ryan Humphrey, Graham Stockton, Ashwath Seetharaman) 60, highest #11, ranked by 12 voters

The University of Texas gains an excellent team almost ex nihilo this coming year, with science-focused graduate student Ryan Humphrey arriving from Duke and a trio of good high school players converging on Austin. The biggest addition of the three is likely Jas Singh, who was very close to the best, if not the best, high school history player of the last season, and who has a proven ability to improve meteorically. This team is rounded out by science and mythology player Ashwath Seetharaman from Katy Taylor and an as yet undetermined fourth, possibly Graham Stockton of LASA. Uncertainty around how this team will gel and a near-complete lack of literature coverage keep it from attaining a higher ranking, but Texas remains a team to watch as the year progresses.


  1. Maryland Terrapins B (Four of: Vishwa Shanmugam, Jack Lewis, Jack Nolan, Adam Howlett, Jakob Boeye, Noah Chen, Ani Perumalla, Alex Echikson), 54, highest #19, ranked by 11 voters

Maryland has a multitude of options for its B team in the coming year, all of them excellent. Those options include several strong high school players, most notably Vishwa Shanmugam, a top 3 high school science player, Jakob Boeye, a literature specialist who took his Centennial team to a 5th place finish at HSNCT, Richard Montgomery top scorer and history specialist Adam Howlett, and IPNCT champion Jack Lewis, an exceptional history player. Other options include NAQT-eligible science specialist Noah Chen, formerly of Michigan, generalist Ani Perumalla, history and geography specialist Alex Echikson, and math and music player Jack Nolan. It remains to be seen how well the high school players especially will adjust to no longer needing to generalize, how well its younger players will scale, and how well this team will come together, but the amount of raw talent going into Maryland B is impossible to ignore.


  1. Duke Blue Devils (Lucian Li, Gabe Guedes, Annabelle Yang) , 42, highest #20, ranked by 10 voters

The loss of Ryan Humphrey will hurt Duke, especially with regard to science coverage, but Duke retains a solid team with history specialist Lucian Li, generalist Gabe Guedes, and extraordinarily deep art and classics specialist Annabelle Yang. After disappointing performances at both nationals in 2018, it remains to be seen how well Duke will recover, but all the ingredients are in place for the Blue Devils to be a serious threat if a player to fill the science gap left by Humphrey’s departure can be found.


  1. Harvard Crimson (Alex Cohen, Michael Yue, Luke Minton, Jon Suh), 33, highest #18, ranked by 9 voters

Harvard loses the top scorer of its 2nd-place D2 team, Nathaniel Brodsky, and A-teamer Jiho Park, but retains history and religion player Jon Suh and literature specialist Alex Cohen. The team is rounded out by generalist Luke Minton and music specialist Michael Yue.


  1. Michigan Wolverines (Austin Foos, Conor Thompson, Daniel Guo, Rudra Ranganathan), 28, highest #17, ranked by 7 voters

Michigan graduates ¾ of the A team that took them to an extraordinary 4th-place finish at ICT last year, retaining only history specialist Austin Foos. Kenji Shimizu’s departure should give the categorization-defying multiple-things specialist Conor Thompson’s geography knowledge a chance to shine, especially at ICT, and Rudra Ranganathan and arts specialist Daniel Guo fill out the team. This team may not be able to repeat last year’s stunning success, but, especially at ICT, they’re not entirely out of the picture.

2018 Collegiate Quizbowl Nationals Preview

The following nationals preview draws on a midseason poll carried out on the forums, and on an IRC discussion rundown of each of the teams on that poll. As such, it does not represent the opinion of any one person, the official views of, or anything like that. Thanks to all those who participated in the poll and to the all who contributed by participating in the subsequent discussion.

25. University of Florida (preseason ranking: unranked)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Taylor Harvey, John Lievonen, Jonathen Settle, Alex Shaw
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Taylor Harvey, Tracy Mirkin, Jonathen Settle, Alex Shaw
This year, Florida has established itself as clearly the best team in the southeastern United States. That success is powered first and foremost by Taylor Harvey, who has demonstrated the ability to scale his literature-focused humanities knowledge to higher difficulty. Alex Shaw has similar strengths to Harvey, and physicist Jonathen Settle is the team’s designated science player. At ACF Nationals, Florida will boast one of the top freshmen in the country in Tracy Mirkin. At ACF Regionals, Mirkin matched Harvey buzz-for-buzz, contributing mostly on history, and his strong showing at the Auburn site of Cal’s Mid-Spring Tournament (CMST) showed that his abilities are not limited to regular-difficulty questions. However, Mirkin will compete in Division II at ICT; in his place, Florida’s A team will add John Lievonen, who brings strength on the NAQT specialty of current events.

24. Johns Hopkins University (preseason ranking: unranked)
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Eric Bobrow, Robert Chu, Seth Ebner, Noah Stanco
The addition of Robert Chu, formerly of Harvard, has been key for Hopkins, which has vied all year for the title of best team south of the Mason–Dixon line. The partnership of Bobrow and Chu has dominated local rival Maryland, winning all three games so far this year against Maryland; in addition, a Johns Hopkins team without Chu beat the full Maryland team at Penn Bowl. Results against other local powers Virginia and Duke have been spottier, and the general weakness of the Mid-Atlantic region (a far cry from years past) has contributed to Johns Hopkins’s relatively low ranking. Johns Hopkins is very strong on science, as physics PhD student Bobrow and medical student Chu can buzz in their subject areas, but both also possess significant strength elsewhere, particularly in the arts. At ACF Nationals, that pair will be joined by Seth Ebner (formerly of Washington University in St. Louis) and Noah Stanco. Hopkins will not be playing Division I ICT, but the school’s massive stable of Division II-eligible players (including every current member of the club except Chu and Ebner) should produce a strong showing in that category this year at Rosemont.

23. University of Maryland (preseason ranking: 24)
Projected lineup: Weijia Cheng, Justin Hawkins, Jack Nolan, Graham Reid
After 26 years, Maryland finally got over the hump in 2017 and won its first ever ACF Nationals championship. Maryland now faces the challenge of replacing Jordan Brownstein, arguably the second-best player of all time, as well as two of his teammates. Unlike Brownstein’s Maryland teams, where his dominance on all non-science categories was augmented by small contributions from his supporting cast, this year’s Maryland team is more balanced, with one player taking each of history, science, and literature. The lead role in the rebuilding effort is being played by Weijia Cheng, the only holdover from last year’s national championship team. Cheng was a religion and economics specialist alongside Brownstein, but this year he has demonstrated his ability as a high-level history player. He is joined by New Hampshirite physics PhD student Graham Reid, formerly of Kenyon, who combines science knowledge with college-level generalist ability from his undergraduate days. Rounding out the team are Justin Hawkins, whose unbridled enthusiasm for the game has made him into a solid literature player, and Jack Nolan, whose strengths lie in music and math. This team scales reasonably well, as demonstrated by their respectable performance at the Maryland site of CMST (including one victory in two games against WUSTL). This iteration of Maryland will not do as well at either national championship this year as Maryland has routinely placed in years past, but with every team member returning next year the future for Maryland is bright.

22. University of Oxford (preseason ranking: 22)
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Isaac Brown, George Charlson, Daoud Jackson, Jacob Robertson
Since last year, Oxford has lost the British player best known to Americans, Joey Goldman, as well as well-regarded scientist George Corfield. Moreover, the Oxonians lost to rival Cambridge the position they had long held as the best quizbowl team outside North America. Because the only time that an American team competes against British teams during the regular season is when Chicago flies to Britain to play Oxford’s own tournament, we have no direct evidence of how this year’s Oxford team will fare against American teams. Nevertheless, voters still thought highly enough of Oxford to accord them a spot in the top twenty-five. Oxford’s best player is Daoud Jackson, who is particularly accomplished in fine arts and literature. He is supported by fellow humanities players George Charlson and Isaac Brown, the latter of whom has been largely absent from the British circuit this year due to studying abroad in France. Oxford’s science will be handled by Jacob Robertson, who has been described as the most improved player in Britain. As usual, Oxford and Cambridge will not compete at ICT, so ACF Nationals will be the only chance for those teams to prove themselves against American competition. In a year where Cambridge has been the recipient of foreign attention, Oxford has the potential to surprise with a strong showing at ACF Nationals.

21. Michigan State University (preseason ranking: 21)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Erik Bubolz, Harris Bunker, Tony Incorvati, Jakob Myers
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Erik Bubolz, Harris Bunker, Jakob Myers, Evan Suttell
Thanks to high-flying freshman Jakob Myers, the upset risk that Michigan State poses to higher-ranked teams is greater than that posed by most teams in this part of the rankings. Already this year, Michigan State has dealt multiple defeats at regular difficulty to Chicago A, along with a win over a full-strength Ohio State team at the Illinois site of ACF Regionals. However, outside of Myers’s core area of history and related fields, Michigan State may have a hard time consistently getting buzzes at higher difficulty, meaning that the Spartans’ success will be largely packet-dependent. The ICT distribution will be significantly kinder to this team than that of ACF Nationals, a problem compounded by Michigan State’s lack of science coverage at ACF Nationals thanks to the absence of science specialist Tony Incorvati. At any rate, Michigan State this year will strike fear into many an opposing team.

20. University of Toronto (preseason ranking: 14)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Jay Misuk, Rein Otsason, Aayush Rajasekaran, Simone Valade
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Rein Otsason, Aayush Rajasekaran, Christopher Sims
With the arrival of Patrick Liao and Aayush Rajasekaran (who, rather confusingly, remained enrolled as a graduate student at Waterloo while also enrolling at Toronto) to join Jay Misuk and Rein Otsason, Toronto seemed last year to have formed a Canadian dream team. Toronto did in fact play well last year, finishing in a respectable sixteenth place at ACF Nationals and tied for eleventh at ICT, but outside Canada their performance was overshadowed by McGill. Liao, who had been the only US national champion playing in Canada, is now no longer with the Toronto team, and Toronto’s ranking reflects that. Nevertheless, Toronto retains Otsason, whose science knowledge helps make him the consensus choice for best player in Ontario, and at ICT Misuk’s history knowledge will help as well. Like last year, Toronto this year is a team that should do better at ICT than at ACF Nationals.

19. Washington University in St. Louis (preseason ranking: 16)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Patrick Butenhoff, Charles Hang, Jonathan Mishory, Alex Newman
It had previously been reported that this was to be the last year for Charles Hang, who has represented Washington University since 2009, but he has announced that he will be returning to WUSTL for one more season. This year, Hang and his team will only play ICT, as his unavailability at ACF Regionals led to WUSTL failing to qualify for ACF Nationals. As always, Hang remains a fearsome player who combines some of the best history knowledge in the game with generalist ability from his many years of experience. Will Mason and Seth Ebner have both moved on, but Patrick Butenhoff is still around as Hang’s sidekick. Two other players who have been with the WUSTL A team this year, Cyrus Zhou and Lily Hamer, are both eligible for Division II at ICT. The Division I ICT team will instead feature junior Jonathan Mishory and sophomore Alex Newman, the latter of whom put up impressive numbers at this year’s SCT.

18. University of Virginia (preseason ranking: 19)
Projected lineup: Vasa Clarke, Nick Collins, Lawrence Simon, Eric Xu
Ever since the departure of Matt Bollinger and Tommy Casalaspi, Virginia’s lineup has been very stable, with Virginia A for two straight years fielding a roster of Eric Xu, Vasa Clarke, Lawrence Simon, and Jack Mehr. In the third year of that group, Mehr has been replaced by Nick Collins, formerly of Louisiana Tech. The presence of graduate student Collins means that Virginia will no longer be competing for undergraduate titles, but his strength in literature provides a jolt for a team that had perhaps grown stagnant over the course of a long partnership. Clarke will be leaving after this year for law school at William and Mary, but Xu will presumably be around for one more year. Xu has settled into a niche as a solid but not elite player; it remains to be seen whether he can yet recapture the stardom of his high school days.

17. Duke University (preseason ranking: 20)
Projected lineup: Gabe Guedes, Ryan Humphrey, Lucian Li, Annabelle Yang
Despite losing John Stathis, who has moved one county over to study law at North Carolina, Duke has remained competitive, with their best performance of the season at regular difficulty or higher being their second-place showing at the Virginia site of ACF Regionals. To a core of science player Ryan Humphrey, literature player Gabe Guedes, and history player Lucian Li, Duke has added South Carolinian freshman Annabelle Yang, who boasts very deep knowledge in fine arts and especially in myth. A pseudo-Duke team with Stathis instead of Humphrey (who did science editing for the tournament) performed respectably this year at the Maryland site of CMST, including a victory over Ohio State, which suggests that Duke has what it takes to bounce back this year after a very disappointing finish at last year’s ICT.

16. Stanford University (preseason ranking: 9)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Nikhil Desai, Kyle Sutherlin, Nathan Weiser
Stanford is a difficult team to evaluate; now that Stephen Liu has finished law school, it is not quite clear what the composition of the Stanford A team actually is. As a result, Stanford had the largest variance between voters of any team ranked in this poll. Notably, Stanford will not be attending ACF Nationals this year. At ICT, however, they bring back excellent science player Nikhil Desai, who is back in school after taking some time off, as well as NAQT whiz and accomplished humanities player Nathan Weiser. As is often the case, Stanford brought in an excellent class of freshmen this year, so as for so many schools, 2018 will be a year of transition in Palo Alto.

15. University of Oklahoma (preseason ranking: 18)
Projected lineup: Finn Bender, Thatcher Chonka, Maia Karpovich, Caleb Kendrick
Oklahoma burst onto the quizbowl scene in 2016, finishing in the top two in Division II at both ICT and ACF Nationals and ending up at fourteenth place overall at the latter tournament. On paper, Oklahoma is a formidable team, with Caleb Kendrick’s great strength across the humanities and Maia Karpovich’s unusual combination of science ability and potent skill on geography and NAQT-type questions. Since 2016, however, Oklahoma has struggled to put together a full team for tournaments; Oklahoma played without Karpovich at ICT last year and missed ACF Nationals altogether. This year, shorthanded Oklahoma teams have generally come up short against the Sooners’ main quizbowl rival, Missouri. However, this year the full Oklahoma team will finally get to play both national championships together. It’s do or die for the Sooners this year, as next year Karpovich will head to grad school at Maryland and Caleb Kendrick will potentially decamp for parts unknown.

14. University of Michigan (preseason ranking: 17)
Projected lineup: Noah Chen, Austin Foos, Saul Hankin, Kenji Shimizu
After a spectacular two-year run consisting of four finals and two national championships, Auroni Gupta’s time at Michigan has come to a close, as has Will Nediger’s, while Brian McPeak has retired from active intercollegiate competition. With Siddhant Dogra having decamped to medical school in New York, the only remaining national champion at Michigan is Kenji Shimizu, who has evolved from an NAQT specialist into a formidable lead scorer in his own right. Behind a stellar performance from Shimizu, Michigan beat an Ohio State team without Clark Smith but with Chris Ray to win the Youngstown State site of SCT. Shimizu’s supporting cast consists of science player Noah Chen, history player Austin Foos, and seasoned veteran Saul Hankin. With Shimizu and Chen graduating and Hankin returning to his beloved New York City after this school year, the next great Michigan team will look very different, but this year’s team is well-positioned to make a run at ICT.

13. McGill University (preseason ranking: 11)
Projected lineup: Akhil Garg, Jack Guo, Daniel Lovsted, Derek So, Joe Su
Despite the presence of an ambitious Toronto team, McGill showed convincingly that it was the best team in Canada last year, and nothing has changed on that front this year. At ICT, McGill was a surprise top-bracket team; although the team did not attend ACF Nationals last year, it will be present at both nationals this year. McGill is led by Derek So, who remains the best quizbowl player in Canada. His supporting cast provides extra science coverage, but fails to address So’s biggest weakness, which is history. McGill will have to address that weakness to take the next step, but as long as Derek So is there McGill will remain competitive at the national level.

12. University of Missouri (preseason ranking: 15)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Itamar Naveh-Benjamin, Joe Stitz, Dinis Trindade
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Alexander Harmata, Itamar Naveh-Benjamin, Joe Stitz, Dinis Trindade
Like Oklahoma, Missouri plays on the isolated Great Plains circuit, although its relative proximity to the Midwest circuit means that Missouri plays a larger number of nationally competitive teams. The story of Missouri is the story of senior Itamar Naveh-Benjamin, who puts up spectacular numbers across all categories, especially on arts and literature. At ICT, Naveh-Benjamin’s two teammates are freshmen Joe Stitz and Dinis Trindade, the former of whom brought a strong base of knowledge from high school and the latter of whom is a history specialist. At ACF Nationals, Alexander Harmata will be present to add support on science; his absence at ICT will be dearly felt for a program whose best chance at making a splash is this season.

11. University of California, Berkeley B (preseason ranking: 10)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Eric Chen, Rohin Devanathan, Jonchee Kao, John Xiong
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Michael Coates, Rohin Devanathan, Rahul Keyal, Pranav Sivakumar
The Berkeley club is in much the same place as it was fifteen years ago, with a seemingly inexhaustible supply of freshmen coming up to augment one of the best teams in the country. The holding pen for all those players is Berkeley B, which made the top bracket of ACF Nationals last year and is in very good shape to do so again despite the loss of Sameer Rai. Two of the Ohioans from that Berkeley B team, Michael Coates and Rohin Devanathan, will return to Berkeley B at ACF Nationals this year, and they will be joined by Chicago-area freshman Pranav Sivakumar. Rahul Keyal, whose strengths are much like those of his older brother on the Berkeley A team, is the only Californian on a team that is oddly Midwest-focused given Berkeley’s great wealth of California high school talent. At ICT, freshmen Keyal and Sivakumar will be playing in Division II, while Coates will be playing on Berkeley A. In their places will step in Jonchee Kao, John Xiong, and Eric Chen. Because the addition of Coates means that Berkeley A will not be eligible for the undergraduate ICT title, Berkeley B will be one of the strongest contenders for that position. Chen will be a particularly important part of that effort, as his strength on NAQT-related categories is such that on most teams he would be the NAQT specialist; it just happens that Berkeley has Coates, who is even better on those categories.

10. University of Chicago B (preseason ranking: 12)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Athena Kern, James Lasker, Tamara Vardomskaya, Morgan Venkus
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): James Lasker, Matthew Lehmann, Luke Tierney, Tamara Vardomskaya
The Chicago club has great depth every year, and that depth is evident this year in the strength of the Chicago B squad. For ACF Nationals, Chicago B mainstay James Lasker and recent doctorate recipient Tamara Vardomskaya join two high school superstars in freshmen Luke Tierney and Matthew Lehmann on a balanced team that has been competitive in the Midwest all year. Lehmann in particular has taken to the college game with gusto, and he and Vardomskaya combine to form a formidable literature pairing, while Lasker takes science and Tierney history. However, both freshmen will be playing (and perhaps winning) Division II at ICT, so in their place will step in Athena Kern and Morgan Venkus, both veteran players with pockets of deep knowledge. As a result, the Chicago B team at ICT will have a major hole in history, and may be subject to wild round-to-round variations in performance.

9. University of Minnesota (preseason ranking: 8)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Jason Asher, Sam Bailey, Peter Estall, Shan Kothari
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Jason Asher, Sam Bailey, Shan Kothari, John Waldron
Mike Cheyne departed from Minnesota in 2014 as the last player from Minnesota’s national championship run. Shan Kothari and Jason Asher arrived the same year, starting a new era of Minnesota quizbowl. Sam Bailey arrived in Minneapolis the next year, and those three have formed Minnesota’s core ever since, as Minnesota has consistently hung around the bottom of the top ten. Minnesota is a fringe top-bracket team once again this year, Asher’s last. Bailey and Kothari are both PhD students with years of experience playing hard questions and plenty of deep knowledge, but they have plenty of holes between them. On the other hand, Asher is very successful at regular difficulty, but he has always struggled with harder questions. There are unlikely to be many surprises from this year’s Minnesota team.

8. Northwestern University (preseason ranking: 13)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Jack Drummond, Greg Peterson, Amanda Rosner, Adam Silverman
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Alex Banta, Greg Peterson, Adam Silverman, Anthony Wang
Last year Northwestern rode a wave of shocking upsets to a second-place finish at ICT but then missed the top bracket altogether and finished a disappointing eleventh at ACF Nationals. After losing second scorer Dylan Minarik to graduation, Northwestern is built around Adam Silverman, who demonstrated that he was one of the best science players in quizbowl last year after a period of relative inactivity as an undergraduate at Georgia Tech. Silverman’s top-scoring teammate is law student Greg Peterson, whose superficially impressive point totals come mostly from buzzing at the end of tossups. Silverman’s obvious ability puts Northwestern firmly in the category of teams that could affect the outcome by beating contenders, but without Minarik another ICT final is unrealistic.

6 (tied). Ohio State University (preseason ranking: 6)
Projected lineup: Enoch Fu, Chris Ray, Aakash Singh, Clark Smith, Laurel Spangler
Although this is Chris Ray’s second year at Ohio State, schedule conflicts and issues with American air transit infrastructure led to Ohio State missing both national tournaments last year, so this year will be the first time truly seeing Ohio State in action. At the Maryland site of CMST, Ohio State’s performance was questionable; the Buckeyes split two games with a Penn team that lacked Jaimie Carlson and Aidan Mehigan and dropped a game to a pseudo-Duke team with John Stathis in place of Ryan Humphrey. Nevertheless, Ray is one of the best players in the game, with the ability to get questions in practically any category against practically anyone, especially at ICT. Dual-enrolled high school senior Clark Smith, the best high school player in the country, has drawn comparisons to a young Tommy Casalaspi. Given Ray’s demonstrated ability to develop talent and assuming that Smith matriculates at Ohio State, this team should be one of the best in the country for years to come.

6 (tied). University of Cambridge (preseason ranking: 7)
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Jason Golfinos, Joseph Krol, Ellie Warner, Yanbo Yin
Following in the footsteps of fellow Ivy League graduates John Lawrence, Spence Weinreich, and Aidan Mehigan, Jason Golfinos opted after graduating from Princeton to continue his studies in England. In his first and only year at Cambridge, Golfinos has become part of the most dominant Cantabrigian team in British quizbowl history. Golfinos’s talents would have meshed well with those of science expert Ewan Macaulay, but Macaulay is no longer at Cambridge and Yanbo Yin will have to fill his shoes as Cambridge’s science player. Ellie Warner and Joseph Krol provide humanities support, and Krol adds mathematics knowledge in addition. Ultimately, though, this team will succeed or fail on the back of Golfinos, whose meteoric rise during his last few years at Princeton has reportedly not been halted at Cambridge. As it stands, the record for best performance by a British team at ACF Nationals belongs to Oxford, which finished in ninth place in 2017. Cambridge is well-positioned to surpass that mark and perhaps become the first non-American team to place in the top four.

5. Columbia University (preseason ranking: 5)
Projected lineup: Gerhardt Hinkle, Rafael Krichevsky, Daniel Shao, Ben Zhang
After missing the top bracket at ICT last year, Columbia upset top-ranked and hitherto undefeated Michigan en route to a surprising fourth-place finish at ACF Nationals. Both Wilton Rao and Kailee Pedersen are gone from that team, but Ben Zhang and star Rafael Krichevsky remain. In recent years, Columbia has increasingly become the Rafael Krichevsky show, and things are unlikely to change in that regard this year; at the Columbia site of CMST, Krichevsky nearly doubled the point total of his teammates combined. At that tournament, Columbia dropped its only game against Rutgers and also lost in convincing fashion to Yale. Krichevsky’s talent should be enough to lead Columbia to the top bracket again, but a repeat of last year’s ACF Nationals would be a surprise.

4. University of Chicago (preseason ranking: 4)
Projected lineup: Alston Boyd, John Lawrence, Kai Smith, Jason Zhou
Coming off a relatively disappointing performance in 2017, Chicago has been forced to move on without the face of the team, the now-graduated Max Schindler. Schindler’s loss is most acutely felt in his specialty area of science, where Chicago has no real replacement and will have to try to get by with Kai Smith. Nevertheless, Chicago remains a formidable team. John Lawrence is almost unmatched on music and nearly as strong on literature, and Jason Zhou has taken the path that Weijia Cheng seeks to emulate, going from a specialist on a national championship team as a sophomore to the primary history player on a strong team as a senior. Alston Boyd adds further support across the board, with particular strength in philosophy. Chicago is unlikely to win this year, but this team should produce top-bracket finishes worthy of Chicago’s illustrious quizbowl history.

3. University of Pennsylvania (preseason ranking: 2)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Jaimie Carlson, JinAh Kim, Aidan Mehigan, Eric Mukherjee
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Jaimie Carlson, JinAh Kim, Paul Lee, Eric Mukherjee
Eric Mukherjee won ACF Nationals with Penn in 2015, but his best chance to win ICT is this year, his last before he ends his very long collegiate quizbowl career and decamps for the world of medicine. Mukherjee’s prowess in science remains unmatched, but this is not a one-man team, as Penn showed by finishing in second place at the Georgetown site of SCT even in his absence. That victory was powered in large part by undergraduates Jaimie Carlson and JinAh Kim, who look to provide Mukherjee with something resembling the humanities support that he received from Saajid Moyen in 2015. A major coup this summer for Penn was landing Aidan Mehigan, formerly of Columbia and Oxford, but because he has class the weekend of ACF Nationals, Mehigan will presumably only be available for ICT. While Penn should perform strongly at both national tournaments, the presence of Mehigan means that ICT is Penn’s best shot at making a final or winning a national championship.

2. University of California, Berkeley (preseason ranking: 3)
Projected lineup (ICT Division I): Michael Coates, Aseem Keyal, Bruce Lou, Justin Nghiem
Projected lineup (ACF Nationals): Eric Chen, Aseem Keyal, Bruce Lou, Justin Nghiem
Berkeley has hung around the top tier for several years, but in Aseem Keyal’s senior year the team has taken a step forward. Bruce Lou’s history numbers are eye-popping, and Keyal can get most everything else. Justin Nghiem and Eric Chen add additional strength on literature and history, respectively, while Michael Coates will serve in the same NAQT specialist role at ICT that he did as an undergraduate at Chicago. The ACF Nationals team, made up of four undergraduates from California, is more or less a lock to win the undergraduate title. Playing in the remote northern California circuit, Berkeley has faced very little strong collegiate competition aside from other Berkeley teams, Stanford, and occasionally UC San Diego. As a result, there has been little evidence since last season to suggest how Berkeley will match up against other top collegiate teams, which adds an air of mystery to this year’s proceedings.

1. Yale University (preseason ranking: 1)
Projected lineup: Stephen Eltinge, Adam Fine, Isaac Kirk-Davidoff, Jacob Reed
After Matt Jackson’s graduation in 2014, Yale had no need to rebuild, but merely to reload. After very strong performances in 2016 and 2017, that cycle appears to be complete now, as graduate students Jacob Reed and Stephen Eltinge lead a Yale team with no real weaknesses. Reed is known for his ability in music, where he is without peer save for John Lawrence, but he can buzz with impunity across the distribution. Eltinge is one of the very best science players in the game, and he receives further support on science from young Adam Fine. The incomparable Isaac Kirk-Davidoff, in his last year at Yale, contributes on history, and his best-in-the-country ability on NAQT questions will give Yale a boost at ICT. The main knock on this team is that they have attended very few tournaments, but their dominance when they have played has certainly justified their #1 ranking.

QANTA vs. Humans: Round 3

Jordan Boyd-Graber is giving the audience some details about QANTA.  We’ll probably start in 10 minutes or so.  I believe the players defending the honor of humanity are Auroni Gupta, Ophir Lifshitz, Jennie Yang, and Virginia Ruiz.

Jennie was a good HS quizbowl player for Fremd HS in Illinois.   Virginia is a former community college player for Valencia Community College.

Ophir was a key support player for Jordan “The Viper” Brownstein in their recent ACF Nationals-winning campaign.

And the star of the team, Auroni.   Mrs. Gupta is one of the best active players and has won NAQT ICT with Michigan.   Any team with Auroni is automatically going to be pretty good.

We’re off!  A power from Ophir and two from Auroni gets the humans off to a great start.

QANTA negs!  Auroni picks up lit.  Humans are up 55-(-5)

Another 10 for Auroni.  He negs, QUANTA gets on the board.  60-5.

QANTA powers science.  60-20.  QANTA follows with an early science neg.  Surely the humans can pick it up.  Ophir does.

QANTA negs philosophy.  It’s buzzing in really early.  Auroni picks it up.  80-10 humans.

An art neg for the humans that QANTA converts.  75-20.

QANTA powers lit.  Dylan Minarik, one of last year’s computer conquerors, calls timeout and runs up to the stage to give Auroni his hat.

Another power for QANTA.    Virginia responds by powering trash.

QANTA powers history.  90-65 humans.

QANTA negs science, Auroni picks it up.

A very impressive Euro history power by QANTA!  And another science power.  100-90 humans.

QANTA powers history and takes the lead for the first time!  Jennie powers current events.

QANTA powers history.   Ophir responds with a music power.

QANTA powers lit off the first five words!  The power of the computer in identifying quotes is clear.

QANTA negs geography.  Auroni picks it up.

Auroni negs!  QANTA retakes the lead, 140-135.

Auroni powers twice!  QANTA then negs myth.   Mrs. Gupta power-rebounds.

QANTA powers history.  180-150 humans.

Science and history powers by QANTA.  All tied up with 10 left.

QANTA powers science again!  It’s up 15.

It’s now 205-195 QANTA.  QANTA negs Tossup 34,  Auroni picks it up.  Humans up 205-200.

QANTA powers #36.  It’s up 25 points with 4 questions left.

QANTA powers trash!  It’s really improved.

With two tossups left,  QANTA has locked it up.  It powers #39 for emphasis.

Auroni powers the final tossup, but QANTA defeats the humans 260-215!
What a great victory for Jordan Boyd-Graber, his team, and QANTA.   QANTA has made great strides with trash- previously a topic that the humans had a stranglehold on.   It also seems to have gotten a lot better at current events.  Who will face it next year?   Will they bring back last year’s computer-conquerors Rob Carson and Dylan Minarik?  Will panicked humans send out a distress call for the Viper and the Mukherjesus?  Can Matts Bollinger and Jackson be persuaded to come out of retirement to focus their legendary rage-spite on a new target?


ICT Finals recap:

As mentioned last post, NAQT didn’t allow liveblogging or any use of social media during the ICT finals.  Here’s what I typed during it.

Michigan gets the first tossup, geo, and gets a film bonus.  They 30 it.  40-0.
Lit tossup powered by Will.  20 on the bonus.
It’s hard to hear what’s going on- no microphones.  But Will gets another power, and Michigan gets 10 on the American history bonus.  100-0.

Adam gets Northwestern on the board with a film tossup.  20 on a trash bonus.  100-30.
Adam 10s a physics tossup; they get an astro bonus for 20.
Art tossup to Auroni.  Geo bonus, Michigan 30s.  They’re up 140-60.
Kenji gets recent history!  20 on the history bonus.
Auroni for 10 on history. 10 on the physics bonus.  Michigan’s up 110, 2 minutes left in the first half.
Adam powers chem!  10 on current events.
Sports tossup.  Dylan buzzes in…and can’t pull it.  Neg-5.  Michigan can’t pick it up.
Michigan negs music, Northwestern picks it up.  Time’s about to run out on the half.  10 on the bonus.

At the half, it’s 185-100 to Michigan.  Ten minutes back on the clock to start the second half.
We start off with a history tossup, Greg pulls it out on the prompt.  Art bonus for 20.  185-130 Michigan.
Geo tossup.  Dylan buzzes emphatically.  Northwestern gets a social science bonus for 20.
Auroni gets lit for 10.  Bio bonus for 20.  Michigan up 55 with 7 minutes to go.
Another clutch history buzz by Kenji.  Art bonus for 20.
Bio tossup to Adam.  World history bonus for 10, Michigan leads 245-180.
Tossup 18 is Russian lit.  Auroni gets it and Michigan 20s the physics bonus.  They’re up 95 with four minutes to go.
Will gets a myth tossup; lit bonus for 30.  315-180 with under 3 minutes to go.  Is this it for Northwestern?
Kenji powers RMP!  This looks like it’s going to clinch it.  Northwestern just won’t have enough time left to come back from 350-180.
Dylan gets current events.  20 on the myth bonus.  They pass the third part, but there’s just not enough time or questions left.
Auroni gets #22, and Michigan 30s the bonus.
Last tossup is RMP to Will.  20 on the bonus.  Final score of 420-210.  Michigan wins ICT!  A great effot by Northwestern- before the playoff rounds started, Dylan said “even if we go 0-6 and finish 8th, this tournament is still a success!”  Wonder what he thinks now.

ICT Undergrad Championship

It’ll be Oklahoma vs. Virginia.

Tossup #1 is art, negged by Caleb.  Eric picks it up and Virginia is up 30-0 on a geo bonus.

Eric gets a law tossup; Virginia up 50-(-5).

Finn gets chem; they get 10 on the trash bonus.  50-15 Virginia.

Caleb gets the next tossup and they 20 the lit bonus.

Finn powers myth.  They get 10 on the geology bonus.  Caleb gets astronomy.  They bagel the music bonus, but are still leading 80-50.

Eric gets TU #7; Virginia 30s the recent history bonus.  Jack gets a lit tossup and Virginia goes up 110-80.

Math tossup goes dead.  Lawrence gets the next tossup and they get a physics bonus that they zero.

Eric negs opera but Oklahoma can’t pick it up.  He negs architecture next, and this time Oklahoma does get it.  We’re tied at 110!

Tossup on sports.  Jack can’t convert at the end.  Still 110-all.  Caleb gets the next one, on lit.  Oklahoma now up by 20 after a psych bonus.

Vasa gets social science, then gets 2 parts of a classics bonus.  Virginia 140-130.

Jack gets geo as Eric pumps his fists.  10 on mixed academic.

Finn gets physics, and they get a bio bonus for 10, with a protest pending.  Going into tossup 18, Virginia is up by 10.

Eric gets Euro history.  Art bonus for 10.  Virginia 180-150.

Finn gets a trash tossup, and Oklahoma gets mixed academic for 0.

Bio tossup, negged by Eric.  Oklahoma can’t rebound.

Vasa powers RMP!  Eric yells “YES!”  RMP bonus.  Virginia now up by 40 with at most 3 tossups left.

Caleb with current events.  Trash bonus, 30.  Oklahoma ties it up going into tossup #23  with a minute left!

World history tossup.  Oklahoma gets it at the end…and runs out the clock on the bonus to win the undergrad championship 220-200 in what both teams considered a sloppy game.

Yale vs. Northwestern.

At the request of Eric Mukherjee, I’m here to see whether Northwestern’s slipper still fits.  If they beat Yale, they’ll be playing on the big stage.  In the other key game, Michigan plays Stanford to try to finish the playoff rounds still unbeaten.

Dylan says “We didn’t even have a hype video!”

Max starts Northwestern off with a geo tossup.  American history bonus; Northwestern 30-0.

Isaac gets CE for 10.  Yale gets 20 on RMP.

Another geo tossup.  Max negs, Jacob picks it up.  Yale 50-25.

Adam S. powers bio!  They get a bio bonus for 30.

Isaac negs lit!  Adam S. picks it up for 10.  Northwestern gets 10 on the bonus to go up 90-45.

Dylan gets art.  100-45.  Jacob .  100-65.

Jacob negs lit when he can’t pull the title.  Northwestern can’t convert.

Stephen gets physics.  Greg gets the next tossup, and Northwestern leads 125-100 at the half.

Tossup 12, geo again.  Dylan powers!  Lit bonus for 10.

Dylan gets lit for 10.  Physics bonus.  20.  Northwestern up by 80.

Adam gets social science.  10 on the art bonus.  200-100 Northwestern.

Chem tossup to Adam Silverman!  Northwestern is rolling.  Can Yale break their momentum?  If Northwestern didn’t get only 10s on three bonuses…

Adam S. negs history.  Yale picks it up.

Tossup 17, literature.  Adam S. gets it.  20 on a TV bonus.  235-120.

Adam F. powers RMP.  10 on a math bonus.  History next.

Isaac negs it.  Dylan picks it up, and Northwestern begins stalling the geo bonus.  Adam and Dylan pull 30!

Isaac gets a tossup and is rewarded with a trash bonus.

Trash tossup, Greg gets it.  Northwestern gets 30.  I think they’ve clinched with 3 left.  315-170.

Adam F. negs lit, Max picks it up.  And that’s game!  355-170!

Supposedly, Michigan lost!  That’d give Northwestern a 1-game final against Michigan!

Chicago vs. Michigan.

Tossup 1: Will gets fine arts; Michigan 30s the bonus.

Max gets physics for 10.  Chicago 30s.

John powers; Chicago gets 10 on the CS bonus.  Chicago 65-45.

Will powers a couple lit questions.  Michigan up 105-65.

Auroni gets science.  125-65.  Auroni negs law; Jason picks it up.  Michigan 120-95.

Max gets current events.  History bonus, Chicago goes up by 5.

Auroni gets lit.  Michigan 20s social science to go up 150-125.

Architecture.  Auroni powers; bio bonus for 30.

Kai powers RMP, Chicago 30s a lit bonus.  And that’s the half.  Michigan up 195-170.

Brian negs science, Max picks it up.  Chicago up 10.

Auroni powers lit and puts Chicago on slam-tilt.  They 30 the bonus to go up 235-200.  Kenji gets history; science bonus coming.

Kenji picks up something that’s probably “other academic”.  Michigan 30s the bonus.  Michigan now up 95.

Brian tentatively buzzes and winces, but he’s right.  After 16, Michigan is up 335-200.

Will powers lit, Michigan 30s.  Chicago will need to run the table to have any chance.

Max gets myth.  Then he powers science.  Econ bonus.  380-265 after 20.  Under 3 minutes to go!

John gets music.  Art bonus 20.

Jason makes it four in a row for Chicago…20 on the bonus.  Minute and a half left, Michigan up 380-325 with 3 tossups left.

Brian gets physics for 10!  Clutch.  That’s game, and the end of Chicago’s championship hopes.

Max gets a sports question to end the game, but Michigan wins 400-365.