ACF Nationals 2016 from April 16-17, 2016
Statistics report for Final Rankings
| Standings | Individuals | Scoreboard | Team Detail | Individual Detail | Round Report |
Individual Detail
Ankit Aggarwal (UG), Berkeley A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan A | MIT A | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oxford | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Yale A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Columbia A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 |
| Total | 11.0 | 14 | 3 | 0.00 | 4.67 | 125 |
Aseem Keyal (D2), Berkeley A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Michigan A | MIT A | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Stanford A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Oxford | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Louisville | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 90 | Yale A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Columbia A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 |
| Total | 11.0 | 44 | 5 | 0.00 | 8.80 | 415 |
Bruce Lou (D2), Berkeley A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Michigan A | MIT A | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Chicago A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Oxford | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Louisville | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Yale A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Columbia A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 11.0 | 30 | 4 | 0.00 | 7.50 | 280 |
Justin Nghiem (D2), Berkeley A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan A | MIT A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Stanford A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oxford | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Louisville | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Yale A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Columbia A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| Total | 11.0 | 22 | 3 | 0.00 | 7.33 | 205 |
Eric Chen (D2), Berkeley B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale B (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Virginia Commonwealth | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | William and Mary | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 |
| Total | 7.0 | 16 | 2 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 150 |
Michael Coates, Berkeley B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale B (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia Commonwealth | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | William and Mary | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 17 | 2 | 0.00 | 8.50 | 160 |
Jonchee Kao (D2), Berkeley B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale B (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Virginia Commonwealth | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | William and Mary | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 17 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.25 | 150 |
James Wang (D2), Berkeley B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale B (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Virginia Commonwealth | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | William and Mary | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 12 | 2 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 110 |
Jason Cheng (UG), California, San Diego (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | New College of Florida (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | McMaster | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Ottawa (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | Duke (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Florida | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 |
| Total | 7.0 | 45 | 7 | 0.00 | 6.43 | 415 |
Parikshit Chauhan (D2), California, San Diego (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | New College of Florida (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | McMaster | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Ottawa (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Duke (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Florida | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 11 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 110 |
Jonathan Luck (D2), California, San Diego (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | New College of Florida (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | McMaster | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Ottawa (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Duke (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Florida | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 |
John Lawrence, Chicago A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Louisville | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Minnesota | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Columbia A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Yale A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Michigan A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Stanford A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Michigan A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 12.0 | 49 | 3 | 0.00 | 16.33 | 475 |
Max Schindler (UG), Chicago A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Louisville | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Minnesota | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Columbia A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Michigan A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Stanford A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Michigan A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| Total | 12.0 | 34 | 9 | 0.00 | 3.78 | 295 |
Chris Ray, Chicago A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Louisville | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Minnesota | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Columbia A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Michigan A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Stanford A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Michigan A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 4 | 3 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 25 |
| Total | 12.0 | 50 | 16 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 420 |
Jason Zhou (D2), Chicago A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Minnesota | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Columbia A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Yale A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Stanford A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 12.0 | 15 | 1 | 0.00 | 15.00 | 145 |
James Lasker, Chicago B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Georgia Tech (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | McGill | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Northwestern | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 15 | 3 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 135 |
Athena Kern (D2), Chicago B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Georgia Tech (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | McGill | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Northwestern | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 13 | 2 | 0.00 | 6.50 | 120 |
Kai Smith (D2), Chicago B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Georgia Tech (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | McGill | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Northwestern | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 25 | 1 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 245 |
Alston Boyd (D2), Chicago B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Georgia Tech (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | McGill | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Northwestern | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 17 | 3 | 0.00 | 5.67 | 155 |
Marianna Zhang (D2), Chicago C
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia B | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Virginia (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Stanford B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 15 | 4 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 130 |
Tamara Vardomskaya, Chicago C
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia B | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Virginia (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Stanford B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 12 | 1 | 0.00 | 12.00 | 115 |
Sam Winikow (D2), Chicago C
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia B | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Virginia (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Stanford B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 22 | 1 | 0.00 | 22.00 | 215 |
Samir Khan (D2), Chicago C
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia B | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Stanford B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 |
Olivia Kiser (D2), Chicago D (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan State (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | William and Mary | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 20 | 2 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 190 |
Jacob Manaker (D2), Chicago D (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan State (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Berkeley B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | William and Mary | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 13 | 3 | 0.00 | 4.33 | 115 |
Brett Barbin (D2), Chicago D (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan State (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | William and Mary | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 1 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.33 | -5 |
Adam Black (D2), Chicago D (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan State (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Berkeley B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | William and Mary | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 9 | 3 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 75 |
Aidan Mehigan (UG), Columbia A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Illinois (UG) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Stanford A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Minnesota | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Michigan A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Louisville | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Oxford | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 11.0 | 22 | 4 | 0.00 | 5.50 | 200 |
Ben Zhang (D2), Columbia A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Illinois (UG) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Stanford A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Yale A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Minnesota | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Chicago A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Michigan A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Louisville | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Oxford | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 11.0 | 34 | 5 | 0.00 | 6.80 | 315 |
Rafael Krichevsky, Columbia A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Illinois (UG) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Stanford A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Yale A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Minnesota | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Chicago A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Michigan A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Louisville | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Oxford | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| Total | 11.0 | 32 | 8 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 280 |
Charlie Dees, Columbia A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Illinois (UG) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Stanford A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Yale A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Minnesota | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Louisville | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oxford | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 11.0 | 22 | 2 | 0.00 | 11.00 | 210 |
Wilton Rao (UG), Columbia B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago C | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 | Stanford B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Oklahoma (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 24 | 9 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 195 |
Kailee Pedersen (UG), Columbia B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago C | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oklahoma (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| Total | 7.0 | 9 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 80 |
Saul Hankin, Columbia B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago C | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Stanford B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Oklahoma (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 13 | 3 | 0.00 | 4.33 | 115 |
Harrison Hsu, Columbia B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Stanford B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Oklahoma (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -20 |
| Total | 6.0 | 15 | 5 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 125 |
Will Alston (UG), Dartmouth (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Stanford B | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 | Chicago C | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 9 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 80 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Columbia B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 3 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 35 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 7 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 60 |
| Total | 7.0 | 50 | 12 | 0.00 | 4.17 | 440 |
Charles Jang (UG), Dartmouth (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Stanford B | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago C | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Columbia B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 |
| Total | 7.0 | 8 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 65 |
Ryan Humphrey (D2), Duke (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | McMaster | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Notre Dame (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Florida | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 |
| Total | 7.0 | 19 | 3 | 0.00 | 6.33 | 175 |
John Stathis (UG), Duke (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | McMaster | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Notre Dame (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Florida | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 7.0 | 34 | 2 | 0.00 | 17.00 | 330 |
Gabe Guedes (D2), Duke (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | McMaster | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Notre Dame (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Florida | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 25 | 1 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 245 |
Taylor Harvey (UG), Florida
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Notre Dame (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | McMaster | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | New College of Florida (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Duke (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 14 | 5 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 115 |
Alex Shaw, Florida
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Notre Dame (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | McMaster | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | New College of Florida (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Duke (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| Total | 7.0 | 10 | 6 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 70 |
Julio Gonzalez-Zuluaga (UG), Florida
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Notre Dame (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | McMaster | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | New College of Florida (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Duke (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 10 | 3 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 85 |
Jonathen Settle (UG), Florida
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Notre Dame (UG) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | McMaster | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | New College of Florida (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Duke (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 |
Jason Fern (UG), Georgia (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland B (D2) | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Chicago B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Northwestern | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Princeton (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | McGill | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 |
| Total | 7.0 | 27 | 6 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 240 |
Kailyn LaPorte (UG), Georgia (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland B (D2) | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Northwestern | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Princeton (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 |
Evan Knox (D2), Georgia (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland B (D2) | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Northwestern | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Princeton (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | McGill | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 9 | 5 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 65 |
Julia Tallant (D2), Georgia (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland B (D2) | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Northwestern | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Princeton (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 |
Adam Silverman (UG), Georgia Tech (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago B | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 12 | 1 | 0.00 | 12.00 | 115 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 | Northwestern | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 8 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 70 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 9 | 3 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 75 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | McGill | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 58 | 8 | 0.00 | 7.25 | 540 |
Thomas Dellaert (D2), Georgia Tech (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago B | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Northwestern | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | McGill | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 5 | 4 | 0.00 | 1.25 | 30 |
Nick Pinto (D2), Georgia Tech (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago B | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Northwestern | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 |
Sean Dai (UG), Georgia Tech (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago B | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Northwestern | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 |
Robert Chu (UG), Harvard (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Northwestern | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Maryland B (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | McGill | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 20 | 4 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 180 |
Will Holub-Moorman (UG), Harvard (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Northwestern | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Chicago B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland B (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | McGill | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| Total | 7.0 | 25 | 3 | 0.00 | 8.33 | 235 |
Vimal Konduri (UG), Harvard (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Northwestern | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Maryland B (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | McGill | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 |
| Total | 7.0 | 19 | 2 | 0.00 | 9.50 | 180 |
Raynor Kuang (UG), Harvard (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Northwestern | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Chicago B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 | Maryland B (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | McGill | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 7.0 | 9 | 8 | 0.00 | 1.12 | 50 |
Andrew Wang (UG), Illinois (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia A | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | Stanford A | Michigan A | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 5 | Chicago A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Michigan A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | Louisville | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 | Oxford | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 | Yale A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 5 | 3 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 35 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Minnesota | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 |
| Total | 11.0 | 53 | 18 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 440 |
Alex Fregeau (UG), Illinois (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia A | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | Michigan A | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 | Michigan A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Oxford | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Yale A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Minnesota | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| Total | 11.0 | 18 | 6 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 150 |
Steve Vo (D2), Illinois (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia A | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Michigan A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Chicago A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oxford | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Minnesota | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 |
| Total | 11.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 |
Kurtis Droge, Louisville
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland A (UG) | MIT A | 1.0 | 10 | 1 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 95 | Yale A | Michigan A | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Stanford A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Michigan A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Chicago A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 7 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 60 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Oxford | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 10 | 1 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 95 | Columbia A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 8 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 70 | Minnesota | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 7 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 60 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 |
| Total | 11.0 | 70 | 14 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 630 |
Ramapriya Rangaraju, Louisville
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland A (UG) | MIT A | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale A | Michigan A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oxford | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Minnesota | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 11.0 | 12 | 2 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 110 |
Megan Seldon (UG), Louisville
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland A (UG) | MIT A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale A | Michigan A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Michigan A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oxford | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Columbia A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Minnesota | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 |
| Total | 11.0 | 2 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.40 | -5 |
Jordan Brownstein (UG), Maryland A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale A | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 | Louisville | MIT A | 1.0 | 7 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 60 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Oxford | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 10 | 1 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 95 | Columbia A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Minnesota | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 10 | 1 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 95 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 | Stanford A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 9 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 80 | Michigan A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 7 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 55 | Chicago A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 |
| Total | 11.0 | 94 | 13 | 0.00 | 7.23 | 875 |
Naveed Chowdhury (UG), Maryland A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale A | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Louisville | MIT A | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oxford | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Columbia A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Minnesota | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Chicago A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 11.0 | 4 | 4 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
Ophir Lifshitz (UG), Maryland A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale A | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Louisville | MIT A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oxford | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Columbia A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Minnesota | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Stanford A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Chicago A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 11.0 | 14 | 2 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 130 |
Sam Rombro (D2), Maryland A (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Yale A | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | MIT A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oxford | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Columbia A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Minnesota | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 11.0 | 12 | 3 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 105 |
Weijia Cheng (D2), Maryland B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Georgia (UG) | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | McGill | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Harvard (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Chicago B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Northwestern | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 |
| Total | 7.0 | 23 | 9 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 185 |
Justin Hawkins (D2), Maryland B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Georgia (UG) | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Harvard (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Northwestern | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
Jason Shi (D2), Maryland B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Georgia (UG) | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Harvard (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Northwestern | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 |
Neil Gurram, Massachusetts Institute of Technology A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 90 | Chicago A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Minnesota | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Columbia A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 | Yale A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Michigan A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 3 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 25 | Stanford A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 7 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 55 | Berkeley A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.25 | -10 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 10 | 1 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 95 | Louisville | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 |
| Total | 11.0 | 63 | 19 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 535 |
Anderson Wang (UG), Massachusetts Institute of Technology A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Minnesota | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Columbia A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Yale A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan A | Editors 3 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Louisville | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 10.9 | 18 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 180 |
Saumil Bandyopadhyay (UG), Massachusetts Institute of Technology A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Minnesota | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Columbia A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Yale A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Louisville | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 11.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 |
Clare Keenan (D2), Massachusetts Institute of Technology A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oxford | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago A | Berkeley A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Minnesota | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 11.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 |
Julian Fuchs (D2), Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Virginia (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Columbia B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Dartmouth (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Chicago C | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Stanford B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| Total | 7.0 | 25 | 4 | 0.00 | 6.25 | 230 |
Bryce Hwang (D2), Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Virginia (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Dartmouth (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Chicago C | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Stanford B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 15 | 4 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 130 |
Oliver Ren (D2), Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Virginia (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Dartmouth (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago C | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Stanford B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 11 | 1 | 0.00 | 11.00 | 105 |
Josh Xiong (D2), Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia B | Editors 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago C | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 3.5 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
Erica Liu (D2), Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Virginia (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Columbia B | Editors 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Dartmouth (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
Derek So, McGill
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Princeton (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 | Northwestern | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 12 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 120 | Chicago B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 |
| Total | 7.0 | 42 | 4 | 0.00 | 10.50 | 400 |
Joe Su, McGill
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Princeton (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Northwestern | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 17 | 1 | 0.00 | 17.00 | 165 |
Sebastian Drake (UG), McGill
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Princeton (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Northwestern | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 |
| Total | 7.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 |
Jay Misuk, McMaster
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Duke (UG) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 7 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 55 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Florida | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 9 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 80 | Pittsburgh (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 |
| Total | 7.0 | 47 | 9 | 0.00 | 5.22 | 425 |
Will Nediger, Michigan A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Berkeley A (UG) | MIT A | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Oxford | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Louisville | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 90 | Illinois (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Yale A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Columbia A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Chicago A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Stanford A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | Chicago A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 |
| Total | 12.0 | 58 | 10 | 0.00 | 5.80 | 530 |
Auroni Gupta, Michigan A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Berkeley A (UG) | MIT A | 1.0 | 5 | 3 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 35 | Oxford | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 90 | Louisville | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Illinois (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Yale A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Columbia A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Chicago A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Stanford A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Chicago A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 |
| Total | 12.0 | 66 | 10 | 0.00 | 6.60 | 610 |
Brian McPeak, Michigan A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Berkeley A (UG) | MIT A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oxford | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Louisville | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Yale A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 12.0 | 16 | 1 | 0.00 | 16.00 | 155 |
Sid Dogra (UG), Michigan A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Minnesota | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | MIT A | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oxford | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Illinois (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Columbia A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago A | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Stanford A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago A | Editors 8 (Final 1) | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 12.0 | 18 | 1 | 0.00 | 18.00 | 175 |
Kenji Golimlim (UG), Michigan B (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Virginia Commonwealth | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 12 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 120 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Pennsylvania (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 | William and Mary | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Berkeley B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 |
| Total | 7.0 | 59 | 4 | 0.00 | 14.75 | 570 |
Dillon Edwards (UG), Michigan State (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago D (D2) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Yale B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Berkeley B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | William and Mary | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 |
| Total | 7.0 | 29 | 2 | 0.00 | 14.50 | 280 |
Austin Foos (D2), Michigan State (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago D (D2) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Yale B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Berkeley B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | William and Mary | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 6.0 | 18 | 2 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 170 |
Harris Bunker (D2), Michigan State (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago D (D2) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Yale B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | William and Mary | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 |
Lucas Weingartz (UG), Michigan State (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Chicago D (D2) | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Berkeley B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | William and Mary | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 |
Jason Asher (D2), Minnesota
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Berkeley A (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan A | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Yale A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Columbia A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Chicago A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Stanford A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Oxford | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Louisville | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 11.0 | 16 | 7 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 125 |
Shan Kothari, Minnesota
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Berkeley A (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Michigan A | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Yale A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Columbia A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Stanford A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Oxford | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Louisville | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 |
| Total | 11.0 | 36 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 330 |
Sam Bailey, Minnesota
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Berkeley A (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Michigan A | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Yale A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Columbia A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Oxford | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Louisville | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 11.0 | 25 | 5 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 225 |
Sam Levin (UG), Minnesota
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Berkeley A (UG) | Stanford A, Louisville | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan A | Dartmouth, Chicago B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Columbia A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Chicago A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Maryland A (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oxford | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 |
| Total | 11.0 | 3 | 3 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
Naim Chowdhury (D2), New College of Florida (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | California, San Diego (UG) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Duke (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Florida | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | McMaster | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 9 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 80 |
Ari Plymale (D2), New College of Florida (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | California, San Diego (UG) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Duke (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Florida | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 6.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 |
Conor Welch (D2), New College of Florida (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | California, San Diego (UG) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McMaster | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 |
| Total | 5.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 |
Yonathan Stone (D2), New College of Florida (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Duke (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Florida | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | McMaster | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 5.0 | 11 | 4 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 90 |
Leo Lo (D2), New College of Florida (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | California, San Diego (UG) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Duke (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Florida | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McMaster | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 5.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
Dylan Minarik (UG), Northwestern
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Harvard (UG) | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | McGill | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Georgia Tech (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 |
| Total | 7.0 | 30 | 7 | 0.00 | 4.29 | 265 |
Greg Peterson, Northwestern
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Harvard (UG) | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | McGill | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Georgia Tech (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Chicago B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 7.0 | 29 | 2 | 0.00 | 14.50 | 280 |
Max Rong (UG), Northwestern
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Harvard (UG) | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia Tech (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
Michael McCauley (UG), Northwestern
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Harvard (UG) | Michigan B, Chicago C, Illinois | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | McGill | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Georgia (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Georgia Tech (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Chicago B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Princeton (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
Andrew Kiss (UG), Notre Dame (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Florida | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Duke (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | McMaster | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.20 | -15 |
| Total | 7.0 | 16 | 9 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 115 |
Kevin Yokum (D2), Notre Dame (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Florida | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Duke (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | McMaster | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 11 | 1 | 0.00 | 11.00 | 105 |
Joe Levano (D2), Notre Dame (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Florida | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Pittsburgh (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Duke (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Ottawa (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | McMaster | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| Total | 7.0 | 18 | 7 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 145 |
Caleb Kendrick (D2), Oklahoma (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Washington University in St. Louis | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 7 | 4 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 50 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Columbia B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Stanford B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Chicago C | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Virginia (D2) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 75 |
| Total | 8.0 | 54 | 9 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 495 |
Maia Karpovich (D2), Oklahoma (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Washington University in St. Louis | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Columbia B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Stanford B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Chicago C | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Virginia (D2) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 |
| Total | 8.0 | 23 | 4 | 0.00 | 5.75 | 210 |
Sam Emmerson (D2), Oklahoma (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Washington University in St. Louis | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Columbia B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago C | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Virginia (D2) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 8.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
Dennis Beeby (UG), Ottawa (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Pittsburgh (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Florida | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Duke (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | California, San Diego (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | McMaster | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 90 |
| Total | 7.0 | 43 | 5 | 0.00 | 8.60 | 405 |
Joey Goldman (UG), Oxford
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Chicago A | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Michigan A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Stanford A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Louisville | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Minnesota | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Columbia A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 11.0 | 35 | 7 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 315 |
Spence Weinreich, Oxford
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago A | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Stanford A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Maryland A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Louisville | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Minnesota | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Columbia A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Yale A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 11.0 | 17 | 2 | 0.00 | 8.50 | 160 |
George Corfield (UG), Oxford
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Chicago A | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Michigan A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 | Stanford A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Louisville | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Minnesota | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Columbia A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Yale A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 11.0 | 20 | 8 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 160 |
Daoud Jackson (D2), Oxford
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | MIT B, Stanford B | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago A | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Michigan A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Maryland A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Louisville | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Minnesota | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Yale A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 11.0 | 11 | 3 | 0.00 | 3.67 | 95 |
Lam Tran (D2), Pennsylvania (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | William and Mary | Michigan A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
JinAh Kim (D2), Pennsylvania (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | William and Mary | Michigan A | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Berkeley B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Michigan B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 18 | 5 | 0.00 | 3.60 | 155 |
Jaimie Carlson (D2), Pennsylvania (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | William and Mary | Michigan A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 14 | 3 | 0.00 | 4.67 | 125 |
Max Smiley (D2), Pennsylvania (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | William and Mary | Michigan A | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Berkeley B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan B (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| Total | 7.0 | 13 | 2 | 0.00 | 6.50 | 120 |
Neil Vinjamuri (D2), Pittsburgh (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Ottawa (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | McMaster | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Florida | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Duke (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| Total | 7.0 | 39 | 4 | 0.00 | 9.75 | 370 |
Walt Young (D2), Pittsburgh (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Ottawa (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | McMaster | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Florida | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Duke (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 |
Todd Ernst (UG), Pittsburgh (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Ottawa (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Notre Dame (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | New College of Florida (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | McMaster | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Florida | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Duke (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | California, San Diego (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 8 | 2 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 70 |
Jason Golfinos (UG), Princeton (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | McGill | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 80 | Harvard (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Georgia Tech (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Georgia (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Maryland B (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 10 | 1 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 95 | Northwestern | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Chicago B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 |
| Total | 7.0 | 52 | 7 | 0.00 | 7.43 | 485 |
Austin Brownlow, Stanford A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Illinois (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Louisville | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Oxford | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Berkeley A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Yale A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Minnesota | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Maryland A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Chicago A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Michigan A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 11.0 | 32 | 3 | 0.00 | 10.67 | 305 |
Nikhil Desai (UG), Stanford A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Oxford | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Yale A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Minnesota | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Maryland A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 11.0 | 13 | 1 | 0.00 | 13.00 | 125 |
Stephen Liu, Stanford A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Illinois (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Louisville | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Oxford | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Berkeley A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Yale A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Minnesota | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 50 | Maryland A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Chicago A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Michigan A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 |
| Total | 11.0 | 53 | 7 | 0.00 | 7.57 | 495 |
Benji Nguyen (UG), Stanford A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Columbia A | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Illinois (UG) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Louisville | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oxford | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Berkeley A (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Yale A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Minnesota | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Maryland A (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago A | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan A | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 11.0 | 24 | 4 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 220 |
James Bradbury (UG), Stanford B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Dartmouth (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 | Columbia B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Washington University in St. Louis | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago C | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 8 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 65 |
Alex Freed (UG), Stanford B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Dartmouth (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Columbia B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Washington University in St. Louis | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago C | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 16 | 3 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 145 |
Kyle Sutherlin, Stanford B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Dartmouth (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Columbia B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Washington University in St. Louis | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Chicago C | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| Total | 7.0 | 11 | 4 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 90 |
Nathan Weiser (UG), Stanford B
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Dartmouth (UG) | WUSTL, Virginia | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Columbia B | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Washington University in St. Louis | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Chicago C | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 |
| Total | 7.0 | 26 | 3 | 0.00 | 8.67 | 245 |
Eric Xu (D2), Virginia (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 90 | Stanford B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Chicago C | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 8 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 65 | Columbia B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Oklahoma (D2) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 |
| Total | 8.0 | 46 | 9 | 0.00 | 5.11 | 415 |
Jack Mehr (D2), Virginia (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Stanford B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Chicago C | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Columbia B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Oklahoma (D2) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 8.0 | 12 | 4 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 100 |
Vasa Clarke (D2), Virginia (D2)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Columbia A, Columbia B | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Oklahoma (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford B | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago C | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Washington University in St. Louis | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Columbia B | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Oklahoma (D2) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 8.0 | 9 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 85 |
Casey Bindas, Virginia Commonwealth
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan B (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | William and Mary | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 40 |
Nathaniel Boughner (UG), Virginia Commonwealth
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan B (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | William and Mary | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 | Berkeley B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.33 | -5 |
| Total | 7.0 | 10 | 5 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 75 |
Najwa Watson (UG), Virginia Commonwealth
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan B (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | William and Mary | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Berkeley B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 7 | 3 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 55 |
Akhil Garg (UG), Virginia Commonwealth
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Michigan B (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 35 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | William and Mary | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Berkeley B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 18 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 160 |
Richard Yu (UG), Washington University in St. Louis
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oklahoma (D2) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 6 | 1 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 55 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Chicago C | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Stanford B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Columbia B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 |
| Total | 7.0 | 33 | 5 | 0.00 | 6.60 | 305 |
Charles Hang, Washington University in St. Louis
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oklahoma (D2) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 3 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 25 | Chicago C | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Stanford B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Columbia B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 20 | 6 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 170 |
Seth Ebner (UG), Washington University in St. Louis
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oklahoma (D2) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago C | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Columbia B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 |
Will Mason, Washington University in St. Louis
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Oklahoma (D2) | Maryland A, McGill | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology B (D2) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Chicago C | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Stanford B | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0 | Dartmouth (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Columbia B | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 12 | 4 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 100 |
Sean Smiley, William and Mary
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Pennsylvania (D2) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Chicago D (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Berkeley B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 30 |
| Total | 7.0 | 36 | 5 | 0.00 | 7.20 | 335 |
Chris Miller (UG), William and Mary
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Pennsylvania (D2) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago D (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Berkeley B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Total | 7.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 |
Alex Frey (UG), William and Mary
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Pennsylvania (D2) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Chicago D (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Berkeley B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 160 |
Ben Bechtold (D2), William and Mary
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Pennsylvania (D2) | Michigan A | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Yale B (UG) | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Chicago D (D2) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Berkeley B | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan State (UG) | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 |
| Total | 7.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 |
Stephen Eltinge, Yale A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland A (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Louisville | Michigan A | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Columbia A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Minnesota | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Stanford A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Michigan A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Illinois (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Oxford | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 11.0 | 21 | 4 | 0.00 | 5.25 | 190 |
Isaac Kirk-Davidoff (D2), Yale A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland A (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Louisville | Michigan A | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Columbia A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Minnesota | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Stanford A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -10 | Chicago A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Oxford | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -5 |
| Total | 11.0 | 17 | 6 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 140 |
Grace Liu (UG), Yale A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland A (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Louisville | Michigan A | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Columbia A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Minnesota | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Stanford A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 | Michigan A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | Chicago A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Illinois (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Oxford | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 40 |
| Total | 11.0 | 23 | 6 | 0.00 | 3.83 | 200 |
Jacob Reed (UG), Yale A
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Maryland A (UG) | Georgia Tech | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Louisville | Michigan A | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Columbia A | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | Minnesota | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology A | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | Stanford A | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Michigan A | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Chicago A | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 10 | Illinois (UG) | Penn, Oklahoma | 1.0 | 7 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 70 | Berkeley A (UG) | Editors 6 | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 20 | Oxford | Editors 7 | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 |
| Total | 11.0 | 43 | 5 | 0.00 | 8.60 | 405 |
Adam S. Fine (D2), Yale B (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Berkeley B | Michigan A | 1.0 | 5 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 45 | William and Mary | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 25 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan State (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 100 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 7 | 1 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 65 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 60 |
| Total | 7.0 | 40 | 3 | 0.00 | 13.33 | 385 |
Laurence Li (UG), Yale B (UG)
| Opponent | Packet | GP | 10 | -5 | P/N | G/N | Pts | Berkeley B | Michigan A | 1.0 | 5 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 50 | William and Mary | Editors 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Michigan B (UG) | Editors 2 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 30 | Michigan State (UG) | VCU, Virginia; Oxford | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 5 | Chicago D (D2) | Editors 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 | Pennsylvania (D2) | Editors 4 | 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 15 | Virginia Commonwealth | Editors 5 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | inf | 20 |
| Total | 7.0 | 17 | 2 | 0.00 | 8.50 | 160 |