LIT Northeast Mirror Hosted by Stony Brook on September 26, 2020 Statistics report for Combined
Standings Individuals Scoreboard Team Detail Individual Detail Round Report

Individual Detail

     Prelims
     Playoffs
     Finals
     Combined

Alice Rogers, Amherst A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Rochester W 485-20 1.0 2 0 0 20 1.50 30
2 Brandeis C W 405-55 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 MIT A L 95-510 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Harvard C L 205-280 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
5 Columbia B L 135-345 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Cornell B W 275-145 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
7 Columbia B L 200-315 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Columbia A L 170-330 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Bowdoin L 95-350 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Brown L 90-275 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 3 3 0 200 0.38 75

Enes Kristo, Amherst A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Rochester W 485-20 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
2 Brandeis C W 405-55 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
3 MIT A L 95-510 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
4 Harvard C L 205-280 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Columbia B L 135-345 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
6 Cornell B W 275-145 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
7 Columbia B L 200-315 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
8 Columbia A L 170-330 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
9 Bowdoin L 95-350 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
10 Brown L 90-275 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 2 19 11 200 0.82 165

Ethan Fine, Amherst A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Rochester W 485-20 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
2 Brandeis C W 405-55 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
3 MIT A L 95-510 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Harvard C L 205-280 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
5 Columbia B L 135-345 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
6 Cornell B W 275-145 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
7 Columbia B L 200-315 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Columbia A L 170-330 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
9 Bowdoin L 95-350 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Brown L 90-275 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
Total 10.0 3 13 3 200 0.80 160

Jeffrey Ma, Amherst A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Rochester W 485-20 1.0 1 7 0 20 4.25 85
2 Brandeis C W 405-55 1.0 1 9 2 20 4.75 95
3 MIT A L 95-510 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
4 Harvard C L 205-280 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
5 Columbia B L 135-345 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
6 Cornell B W 275-145 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
7 Columbia B L 200-315 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
8 Columbia A L 170-330 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
9 Bowdoin L 95-350 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
10 Brown L 90-275 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
Total 10.0 7 38 4 200 2.33 465

Isaac Bindman, Amherst B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell A L 75-560 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 MIT B L 80-400 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
3 Yale A L 220-280 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Brandeis D W 140-80 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 NYU C L 135-155 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
6 NYU C L 95-165 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
7 Rochester W 220-150 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 NYU A L 10-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Brandeis B L 75-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 MIT D L 145-190 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 -10
Total 10.0 0 9 3 200 0.38 75

Isaac Streiff, Amherst B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell A L 75-560 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
2 MIT B L 80-400 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
3 Yale A L 220-280 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 Brandeis D W 140-80 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 NYU C L 135-155 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 NYU C L 95-165 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Rochester W 220-150 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
8 NYU A L 10-450 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
9 Brandeis B L 75-240 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
10 MIT D L 145-190 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
Total 10.0 2 14 5 200 0.72 145

Noah Steiuck, Amherst B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell A L 75-560 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 MIT B L 80-400 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 NYU C L 135-155 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 NYU C L 95-165 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Rochester W 220-150 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 NYU A L 10-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Brandeis B L 75-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 7.0 0 0 0 140 0.00 0

Tian Xa, Amherst B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell A L 75-560 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 MIT B L 80-400 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
3 Yale A L 220-280 1.0 2 4 2 20 3.00 60
4 Brandeis D W 140-80 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
5 NYU C L 135-155 1.0 1 4 2 20 2.25 45
6 NYU C L 95-165 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
7 Rochester W 220-150 1.0 1 6 0 20 3.75 75
8 NYU A L 10-450 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
9 Brandeis B L 75-240 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 MIT D L 145-190 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
Total 10.0 5 29 6 200 1.68 335

Cindy Gao, Belmont

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis E W 240-90 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
2 MIT C W 350-65 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 NYU A W 260-255 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 Brown W 285-230 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
5 Illinois A L 125-375 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
6 Illinois A L 160-305 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 Brandeis A L 160-350 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Harvard C L 95-425 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 MIT B L 85-415 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Wesleyan L 175-280 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
11 Illinois B L 250-270 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
Total 11.0 4 11 0 220 0.77 170

Kiril Kueppenbender, Belmont

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis E W 240-90 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 MIT C W 350-65 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
3 NYU A W 260-255 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Brown W 285-230 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Illinois A L 125-375 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Illinois A L 160-305 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 Brandeis A L 160-350 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Harvard C L 95-425 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 MIT B L 85-415 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Wesleyan L 175-280 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 1 8 0 200 0.47 95

Nathan Sheffield, Belmont

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis E W 240-90 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 60
2 MIT C W 350-65 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
3 NYU A W 260-255 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
4 Brown W 285-230 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 65
5 Illinois A L 125-375 1.0 0 4 2 20 1.50 30
6 Illinois A L 160-305 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
7 Brandeis A L 160-350 1.0 1 2 2 20 1.25 25
8 Harvard C L 95-425 1.0 0 5 2 20 2.00 40
9 MIT B L 85-415 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Wesleyan L 175-280 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
11 Illinois B L 250-270 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
Total 11.0 4 37 12 220 1.68 370

Seiyoung Jang, Belmont

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis E W 240-90 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
2 MIT C W 350-65 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 60
3 NYU A W 260-255 1.0 1 1 3 20 0.50 10
4 Brown W 285-230 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Illinois A L 125-375 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Illinois A L 160-305 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
7 Brandeis A L 160-350 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
8 Harvard C L 95-425 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
9 MIT B L 85-415 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
10 Wesleyan L 175-280 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
11 Illinois B L 250-270 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
Total 11.0 5 22 8 220 1.16 255

Avery Ellis, Bowdoin

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis B W 300-90 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Illinois B L 210-270 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Wesleyan L 120-370 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Yale B W 255-115 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 10
5 Harvard A L 240-320 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
6 Columbia B W 215-210 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
7 Columbia A L 200-280 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 Brown L 100-365 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Amherst A W 350-95 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Cornell B L 145-290 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 1 11 2 200 0.57 115

Eliana Roberts, Bowdoin

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis B W 300-90 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
2 Illinois B L 210-270 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Wesleyan L 120-370 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
4 Yale B W 255-115 1.0 2 0 0 20 1.50 30
5 Harvard A L 240-320 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Columbia B W 215-210 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 Columbia A L 200-280 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Brown L 100-365 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 8.0 2 6 3 160 0.47 75

Justis Dixon, Bowdoin

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis B W 300-90 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Illinois B L 210-270 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Wesleyan L 120-370 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Yale B W 255-115 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Harvard A L 240-320 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Columbia B W 215-210 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
7 Columbia A L 200-280 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Brown L 100-365 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
9 Amherst A W 350-95 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Cornell B L 145-290 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
Total 10.0 1 3 2 200 0.17 35

Michael Borecki, Bowdoin

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis B W 300-90 1.0 0 11 2 20 5.00 100
2 Illinois B L 210-270 1.0 2 5 2 20 3.50 70
3 Wesleyan L 120-370 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
4 Yale B W 255-115 1.0 0 7 1 20 3.25 65
5 Harvard A L 240-320 1.0 2 3 0 20 3.00 60
6 Columbia B W 215-210 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 65
7 Columbia A L 200-280 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
8 Brown L 100-365 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
9 Amherst A W 350-95 1.0 0 14 0 20 7.00 140
10 Cornell B L 145-290 1.0 0 4 2 20 1.50 30
Total 10.0 6 59 10 200 3.15 630

Eli Issokson, Brandeis A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell B W 370-185 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 45
2 Harvard B W 320-270 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
3 MIT D W 465-60 1.0 0 10 0 20 5.00 100
4 Columbia A W 300-290 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
5 NYU B W 335-195 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
6 MIT B W 315-285 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
7 Belmont W 350-160 1.0 0 5 2 20 2.00 40
8 Wesleyan W 360-205 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
9 Harvard C L 190-365 1.0 1 2 2 20 1.25 25
10 Illinois A W 325-255 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
11 Cornell A W 295-230 1.0 2 3 1 20 2.75 55
Total 11.0 7 46 10 220 2.34 515

Isaiah Freedman, Brandeis A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell B W 370-185 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Harvard B W 320-270 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 MIT D W 465-60 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Columbia A W 300-290 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 NYU B W 335-195 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
6 MIT B W 315-285 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Belmont W 350-160 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Wesleyan W 360-205 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Harvard C L 190-365 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Illinois A W 325-255 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
11 Cornell A W 295-230 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 11.0 0 3 1 220 0.11 25

Joey Kornman, Brandeis A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell B W 370-185 1.0 3 1 0 20 2.75 55
2 Harvard B W 320-270 1.0 2 3 1 20 2.75 55
3 MIT D W 465-60 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 60
4 Columbia A W 300-290 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
5 NYU B W 335-195 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
6 MIT B W 315-285 1.0 3 2 0 20 3.25 65
7 Belmont W 350-160 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
8 Wesleyan W 360-205 1.0 2 4 0 20 3.50 70
9 Harvard C L 190-365 1.0 2 1 1 20 1.75 35
10 Illinois A W 325-255 1.0 3 2 1 20 3.00 60
11 Cornell A W 295-230 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
Total 11.0 20 31 5 220 2.66 585

Sam Darmstadt, Brandeis A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Cornell B W 370-185 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Harvard B W 320-270 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 MIT D W 465-60 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
4 Columbia A W 300-290 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 NYU B W 335-195 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
6 MIT B W 315-285 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Belmont W 350-160 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 Wesleyan W 360-205 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Harvard C L 190-365 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Illinois A W 325-255 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
11 Cornell A W 295-230 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
Total 11.0 0 15 2 220 0.64 140

Albert Countryman, Brandeis B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Bowdoin L 90-300 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Harvard A L 25-600 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
3 Yale B W 190-130 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Illinois B L 175-360 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
5 Wesleyan L 55-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Rochester W 235-80 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
7 NYU A L 75-350 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
8 MIT D W 220-125 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Amherst B W 240-75 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
10 NYU C L 55-210 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
Total 10.0 0 4 6 200 0.05 10

Arielle Kolodzinski, Brandeis B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Bowdoin L 90-300 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Harvard A L 25-600 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Yale B W 190-130 1.0 2 4 0 20 3.50 70
4 Illinois B L 175-360 1.0 0 8 0 20 4.00 80
5 Wesleyan L 55-450 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
6 Rochester W 235-80 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
7 NYU A L 75-350 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 MIT D W 220-125 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
9 Amherst B W 240-75 1.0 0 8 0 20 4.00 80
10 NYU C L 55-210 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 4 36 2 200 2.05 410

Hannah Nekritz, Brandeis B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Bowdoin L 90-300 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Harvard A L 25-600 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Yale B W 190-130 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Illinois B L 175-360 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Wesleyan L 55-450 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
6 Rochester W 235-80 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
7 NYU A L 75-350 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 MIT D W 220-125 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Amherst B W 240-75 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
10 NYU C L 55-210 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 1 13 0 200 0.72 145

Randy Lawlor, Brandeis B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Bowdoin L 90-300 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
2 Harvard A L 25-600 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Yale B W 190-130 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
4 Illinois B L 175-360 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Wesleyan L 55-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Rochester W 235-80 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 NYU A L 75-350 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 MIT D W 220-125 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
9 Amherst B W 240-75 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 NYU C L 55-210 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 1 11 0 200 0.63 125

Ellis Zehnder, Brandeis C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard C L 35-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Amherst A L 55-405 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
3 Columbia B L 80-340 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 MIT A L 120-435 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
5 Rochester L 115-225 1.0 0 0 3 20 -0.75 -15
6 Yale B W 150-135 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
7 Brandeis E W 230-130 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 NYU B W 230-20 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
9 MIT C L 110-270 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
10 Brandeis D W 160-100 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 1 23 8 200 1.02 205

Jake Amaral, Brandeis C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard C L 35-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Amherst A L 55-405 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Columbia B L 80-340 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 MIT A L 120-435 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Rochester L 115-225 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
6 Yale B W 150-135 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
7 Brandeis E W 230-130 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 NYU B W 230-20 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 MIT C L 110-270 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Brandeis D W 160-100 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 0 7 1 200 0.33 65

Noah Copperman, Brandeis C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard C L 35-450 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
2 Amherst A L 55-405 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
3 Columbia B L 80-340 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 MIT A L 120-435 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Rochester L 115-225 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
6 Yale B W 150-135 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
7 Brandeis E W 230-130 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
8 NYU B W 230-20 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
9 MIT C L 110-270 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
10 Brandeis D W 160-100 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
Total 10.0 4 17 2 200 1.10 220

Quinn Filler, Brandeis C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard C L 35-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Amherst A L 55-405 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
3 Columbia B L 80-340 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 MIT A L 120-435 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Rochester L 115-225 1.0 1 0 2 20 0.25 5
6 Yale B W 150-135 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 Brandeis E W 230-130 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 NYU B W 230-20 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
9 MIT C L 110-270 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Brandeis D W 160-100 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 1 11 4 200 0.53 105

Alex Ahn, Brandeis D

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT B L 15-455 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Cornell A L 10-520 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Amherst B L 80-140 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Yale A L 10-415 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Brandeis E W 130-80 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 NYU B L 80-210 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 6.0 0 0 0 120 0.00 0

Alicia Tu, Brandeis D

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT B L 15-455 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 NYU C L 95-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Cornell A L 10-520 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Amherst B L 80-140 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Yale A L 10-415 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 MIT C L 50-285 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 Yale B L 50-140 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
8 Brandeis E W 130-80 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 NYU B L 80-210 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Brandeis C L 100-160 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 0 6 1 200 0.28 55

Matt Blanco, Brandeis D

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT B L 15-455 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 NYU C L 95-220 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
3 Cornell A L 10-520 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Amherst B L 80-140 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Yale A L 10-415 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 MIT C L 50-285 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Yale B L 50-140 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
8 Brandeis E W 130-80 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
9 NYU B L 80-210 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Brandeis C L 100-160 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
Total 10.0 1 9 4 200 0.42 85

Tony Consentino, Brandeis D

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT B L 15-455 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
2 NYU C L 95-220 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
3 Cornell A L 10-520 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Amherst B L 80-140 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 Yale A L 10-415 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 MIT C L 50-285 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
7 Yale B L 50-140 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
8 Brandeis E W 130-80 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
9 NYU B L 80-210 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
10 Brandeis C L 100-160 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
Total 10.0 0 24 2 200 1.15 230

Alex G, Brandeis E

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Belmont L 90-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Brown L 50-455 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Illinois A L 95-330 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
4 NYU A L 30-350 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 MIT C L 130-145 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 10
8 Brandeis D L 80-130 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 MIT C L 40-325 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 6.5 1 4 0 130 0.42 55

Charlotte Topchik, Brandeis E

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
5 MIT C L 130-145 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 10
6 NYU B L 90-130 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
7 Brandeis C L 130-230 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 Brandeis D L 80-130 0.5 0 2 0 10 2.00 20
10 MIT C L 40-325 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 4.0 0 7 0 80 0.88 70

Ian Duffield, Brandeis E

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Belmont L 90-240 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
2 Brown L 50-455 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Illinois A L 95-330 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
4 NYU A L 30-350 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
5 MIT C L 130-145 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
6 NYU B L 90-130 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
7 Brandeis C L 130-230 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
8 Brandeis D L 80-130 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 0
Total 7.5 0 21 1 150 1.37 205

Jonah White, Brandeis E

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Belmont L 90-240 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Brown L 50-455 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Illinois A L 95-330 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
4 NYU A L 30-350 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
5 MIT C L 130-145 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 Brandeis D L 80-130 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 MIT C L 40-325 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 7.0 1 9 1 140 0.71 100

Tanner Eustace, Brandeis E

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Belmont L 90-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Brown L 50-455 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Illinois A L 95-330 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 NYU A L 30-350 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 MIT C L 130-145 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 NYU B L 90-130 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Brandeis C L 130-230 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Brandeis D L 80-130 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 MIT C L 40-325 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 9.0 0 4 0 180 0.22 40

Christopher Shin, Brown

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois A L 265-330 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Brandeis E W 455-50 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 MIT C W 325-60 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Belmont L 230-285 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 NYU A W 295-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Columbia A L 170-335 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
7 Cornell B W 355-205 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Bowdoin W 365-100 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Columbia B L 235-315 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Amherst A W 275-90 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 0 1 1 200 0.03 5

Jason Hong, Brown

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois A L 265-330 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 10
2 Brandeis E W 455-50 1.0 2 4 0 20 3.50 70
3 MIT C W 325-60 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
4 Belmont L 230-285 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
5 NYU A W 295-235 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
6 Columbia A L 170-335 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
7 Cornell B W 355-205 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
8 Bowdoin W 365-100 1.0 3 4 0 20 4.25 85
9 Columbia B L 235-315 1.0 3 2 0 20 3.25 65
10 Amherst A W 275-90 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
Total 10.0 14 25 5 200 2.17 435

Michael Li, Brown

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois A L 265-330 1.0 0 0 3 20 -0.75 -15
2 Brandeis E W 455-50 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
3 MIT C W 325-60 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
4 Belmont L 230-285 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
5 NYU A W 295-235 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
6 Columbia A L 170-335 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
7 Cornell B W 355-205 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
8 Bowdoin W 365-100 1.0 2 0 1 20 1.25 25
9 Columbia B L 235-315 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 -10
10 Amherst A W 275-90 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
Total 10.0 9 9 9 200 0.90 180

Walter Zhang, Brown

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois A L 265-330 1.0 2 6 0 20 4.50 90
2 Brandeis E W 455-50 1.0 2 5 0 20 4.00 80
3 MIT C W 325-60 1.0 1 9 1 20 5.00 100
4 Belmont L 230-285 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
5 NYU A W 295-235 1.0 0 4 2 20 1.50 30
6 Columbia A L 170-335 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 15
7 Cornell B W 355-205 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
8 Bowdoin W 365-100 1.0 1 3 2 20 1.75 35
9 Columbia B L 235-315 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
10 Amherst A W 275-90 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 60
Total 10.0 9 42 11 200 2.50 500

Albert Zhang, Columbia A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard B L 270-300 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
2 MIT D W 405-95 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
3 NYU B W 365-180 1.0 0 4 2 20 1.50 30
4 Brandeis A L 290-300 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
5 Cornell B W 375-155 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
6 Brown W 335-170 1.0 1 6 1 20 3.50 70
7 Bowdoin W 280-200 1.0 1 3 3 20 1.50 30
8 Amherst A W 330-170 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
9 Cornell B W 450-85 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
10 Columbia B W 360-155 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
Total 10.0 4 35 11 200 1.77 355

Caroline Mao, Columbia A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard B L 270-300 1.0 3 0 0 20 2.25 45
2 MIT D W 405-95 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
3 NYU B W 365-180 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
4 Brandeis A L 290-300 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 10
5 Cornell B W 375-155 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
6 Brown W 335-170 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
7 Bowdoin W 280-200 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
8 Amherst A W 330-170 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
9 Cornell B W 450-85 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
10 Columbia B W 360-155 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 9 21 2 200 1.68 335

John John Groger, Columbia A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard B L 270-300 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
2 MIT D W 405-95 1.0 0 7 1 20 3.25 65
3 NYU B W 365-180 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
4 Brandeis A L 290-300 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
5 Cornell B W 375-155 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 55
6 Brown W 335-170 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 Bowdoin W 280-200 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 65
8 Amherst A W 330-170 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
9 Cornell B W 450-85 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 70
10 Columbia B W 360-155 1.0 1 7 0 20 4.25 85
Total 10.0 6 48 2 200 2.80 560

Emhyr Subramanian, Columbia B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT A L 130-355 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
2 Harvard C L 285-300 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Brandeis C W 340-80 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
4 Rochester W 445-40 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
5 Amherst A W 345-135 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
6 Bowdoin L 210-215 1.0 0 0 3 20 -0.75 -15
7 Amherst A W 315-200 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
8 Cornell B W 295-165 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
9 Brown W 315-235 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Columbia A L 155-360 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 1 14 7 200 0.60 120

Gareth Thorlakson, Columbia B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT A L 130-355 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 55
2 Harvard C L 285-300 1.0 1 6 0 20 3.75 75
3 Brandeis C W 340-80 1.0 0 13 0 20 6.50 130
4 Rochester W 445-40 1.0 1 11 1 20 6.00 120
5 Amherst A W 345-135 1.0 1 7 0 20 4.25 85
6 Bowdoin L 210-215 1.0 0 9 1 20 4.25 85
7 Amherst A W 315-200 1.0 1 7 0 20 4.25 85
8 Cornell B W 295-165 1.0 0 12 0 20 6.00 120
9 Brown W 315-235 1.0 1 8 0 20 4.75 95
10 Columbia A L 155-360 1.0 1 5 3 20 2.50 50
Total 10.0 6 84 6 200 4.50 900

Haley Herbert, Columbia B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT A L 130-355 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Harvard C L 285-300 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Brandeis C W 340-80 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Rochester W 445-40 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Amherst A W 345-135 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Bowdoin L 210-215 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
7 Amherst A W 315-200 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Cornell B W 295-165 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Brown W 315-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Columbia A L 155-360 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 0 2 1 200 0.07 15

Lilienne Shore Kilgore-Brown, Columbia B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT A L 130-355 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Harvard C L 285-300 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Brandeis C W 340-80 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Rochester W 445-40 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Amherst A W 345-135 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Bowdoin L 210-215 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
7 Amherst A W 315-200 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Cornell B W 295-165 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Brown W 315-235 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Columbia A L 155-360 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
Total 10.0 0 4 2 200 0.15 30

Dan Ni, Cornell A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
11 Brandeis A L 230-295 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
Total 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15

Daniel Xu, Cornell A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst B W 560-75 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
2 Yale A L 210-310 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
3 Brandeis D W 520-10 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
4 NYU C W 475-70 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 MIT B L 250-335 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
6 Harvard A W 365-265 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
7 Illinois B W 395-205 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
8 Yale A L 285-295 1.0 0 1 2 21 0.00 0
9 MIT A W 420-220 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
10 Harvard B W 480-95 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 3 23 7 201 1.19 240

Jonathan Tran, Cornell A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst B W 560-75 1.0 5 1 0 20 4.25 85
2 Yale A L 210-310 1.0 3 1 1 20 2.50 50
3 Brandeis D W 520-10 1.0 3 2 0 20 3.25 65
4 NYU C W 475-70 1.0 3 1 1 20 2.50 50
5 MIT B L 250-335 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
6 Harvard A W 365-265 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
7 Illinois B W 395-205 1.0 3 2 0 20 3.25 65
8 Yale A L 285-295 1.0 2 1 0 21 1.90 40
9 MIT A W 420-220 1.0 3 1 0 20 2.75 55
10 Harvard B W 480-95 1.0 5 0 0 20 3.75 75
11 Brandeis A L 230-295 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
Total 11.0 31 13 3 221 2.62 580

Luc Wetherbee, Cornell A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst B W 560-75 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
2 Yale A L 210-310 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Brandeis D W 520-10 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
4 NYU C W 475-70 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
5 MIT B L 250-335 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
6 Harvard A W 365-265 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
7 Illinois B W 395-205 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 Yale A L 285-295 1.0 0 1 0 21 0.48 10
9 MIT A W 420-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Harvard B W 480-95 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
11 Brandeis A L 230-295 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 11.0 5 15 0 221 1.02 225

Raymond Wang, Cornell A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst B W 560-75 1.0 3 1 0 20 2.75 55
2 Yale A L 210-310 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
3 Brandeis D W 520-10 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 45
4 NYU C W 475-70 1.0 3 2 2 20 2.75 55
5 MIT B L 250-335 1.0 2 2 2 20 2.00 40
6 Harvard A W 365-265 1.0 2 0 0 20 1.50 30
7 Illinois B W 395-205 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
8 Yale A L 285-295 1.0 3 2 0 21 3.10 65
9 MIT A W 420-220 1.0 3 2 1 20 3.00 60
10 Harvard B W 480-95 1.0 2 3 0 20 3.00 60
11 Brandeis A L 230-295 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
Total 11.0 20 22 8 221 2.17 480

Dan Ni, Cornell B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis A L 185-370 1.0 2 1 2 20 1.50 30
2 NYU B W 305-110 1.0 2 3 1 20 2.75 55
3 Harvard B L 115-335 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
4 MIT D W 245-140 1.0 0 7 1 20 3.25 65
5 Columbia A L 155-375 1.0 0 5 2 20 2.00 40
6 Amherst A L 145-275 1.0 0 3 3 20 0.75 15
7 Brown L 205-355 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
8 Columbia B L 165-295 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
9 Columbia A L 85-450 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
10 Bowdoin W 290-145 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
Total 10.0 6 35 12 200 1.90 380

David Ovetsky, Cornell B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis A L 185-370 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
2 NYU B W 305-110 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
3 Harvard B L 115-335 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
4 MIT D W 245-140 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Columbia A L 155-375 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Amherst A L 145-275 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
7 Brown L 205-355 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Columbia B L 165-295 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Columbia A L 85-450 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
10 Bowdoin W 290-145 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
Total 10.0 2 10 8 200 0.45 90

Jacob Kiviat, Cornell B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis A L 185-370 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 NYU B W 305-110 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Harvard B L 115-335 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
4 MIT D W 245-140 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Columbia A L 155-375 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Amherst A L 145-275 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Brown L 205-355 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Columbia B L 165-295 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
9 Columbia A L 85-450 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Bowdoin W 290-145 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
Total 10.0 2 4 1 200 0.33 65

Shehryar Qazi, Cornell B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis A L 185-370 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
2 NYU B W 305-110 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
3 Harvard B L 115-335 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
4 MIT D W 245-140 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Columbia A L 155-375 1.0 1 0 2 20 0.25 5
6 Amherst A L 145-275 1.0 1 3 2 20 1.75 35
7 Brown L 205-355 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
8 Columbia B L 165-295 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 -10
9 Columbia A L 85-450 1.0 0 1 4 20 -0.50 -10
10 Bowdoin W 290-145 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 4 18 14 200 0.85 170

Jon Suh, Harvard A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Yale B W 530-60 1.0 2 8 0 20 5.50 110
2 Brandeis B W 600-25 1.0 3 4 1 20 4.00 80
3 Illinois B W 325-190 1.0 2 3 3 20 2.25 45
4 Wesleyan W 290-280 0.9 2 2 0 18 2.78 50
5 Bowdoin W 320-240 0.8 2 1 1 17 2.06 35
6 Cornell A L 265-365 1.0 2 0 2 20 1.00 20
7 Yale A W 385-210 1.0 2 3 0 20 3.00 60
8 MIT A W 415-230 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
9 Harvard B L 255-375 1.0 3 2 1 20 3.00 60
10 Illinois B W 450-155 1.0 3 2 3 20 2.50 50
Total 9.7 22 29 12 195 2.87 560

Kelvin Li, Harvard A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
7 Yale A W 385-210 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 MIT A W 415-230 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
9 Harvard B L 255-375 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Illinois B W 450-155 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
11 Harvard C L 230-295 1.0 3 1 3 20 2.00 40
Total 5.0 4 9 3 100 1.35 135

Michael Yue, Harvard A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Yale B W 530-60 1.0 1 6 3 20 3.00 60
2 Brandeis B W 600-25 1.0 2 8 0 20 5.50 110
3 Illinois B W 325-190 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 70
4 Wesleyan W 290-280 1.0 2 4 2 21 2.86 60
5 Bowdoin W 320-240 1.0 4 5 1 20 5.25 105
6 Cornell A L 265-365 1.0 2 5 1 20 3.75 75
7 Yale A W 385-210 1.0 2 5 1 20 3.75 75
8 MIT A W 415-230 1.0 3 1 0 20 2.75 55
9 Harvard B L 255-375 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
10 Illinois B W 450-155 1.0 2 3 1 20 2.75 55
11 Harvard C L 230-295 1.0 3 1 1 20 2.50 50
Total 11.0 22 46 10 221 3.35 740

Jake, Harvard B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia A W 300-270 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Brandeis A L 270-320 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 10
3 Cornell B W 335-115 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
4 NYU B W 220-105 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
5 MIT D W 395-110 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Yale A L 240-280 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 MIT A L 275-290 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Illinois B W 355-180 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
9 Harvard A W 375-255 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Cornell A L 95-480 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
11 Illinois A W 310-155 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 11.0 1 6 4 220 0.25 55

Mazin Omer, Harvard B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia A W 300-270 1.0 0 4 2 20 1.50 30
2 Brandeis A L 270-320 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Cornell B W 335-115 1.0 0 4 2 20 1.50 30
4 NYU B W 220-105 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
5 MIT D W 395-110 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
6 Yale A L 240-280 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
7 MIT A L 275-290 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
8 Illinois B W 355-180 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
9 Harvard A W 375-255 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
10 Cornell A L 95-480 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
11 Illinois A W 310-155 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 11.0 3 25 8 220 1.16 255

Ricky Li, Harvard B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia A W 300-270 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 60
2 Brandeis A L 270-320 1.0 2 6 2 20 4.00 80
3 Cornell B W 335-115 1.0 1 7 3 20 3.50 70
4 NYU B W 220-105 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
5 MIT D W 395-110 1.0 1 8 0 20 4.75 95
6 Yale A L 240-280 1.0 3 5 2 20 4.25 85
7 MIT A L 275-290 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
8 Illinois B W 355-180 1.0 5 6 1 20 6.50 130
9 Harvard A W 375-255 1.0 5 5 1 20 6.00 120
10 Cornell A L 95-480 1.0 2 1 4 20 1.00 20
11 Illinois A W 310-155 1.0 3 6 1 20 5.00 100
Total 11.0 25 56 17 220 3.86 850

Sean, Harvard B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia A W 300-270 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Brandeis A L 270-320 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Cornell B W 335-115 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 NYU B W 220-105 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 MIT D W 395-110 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Yale A L 240-280 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Illinois B W 355-180 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Harvard A W 375-255 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Cornell A L 95-480 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 9.0 0 0 0 180 0.00 0

Chris, Harvard C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis C W 450-35 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
2 Columbia B W 300-285 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
3 Rochester W 365-135 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 65
4 Amherst A W 280-205 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
5 MIT A W 350-175 1.0 3 3 0 20 3.75 75
6 Wesleyan L 230-295 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
7 Illinois A L 265-320 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
8 Belmont W 425-95 1.0 2 5 0 20 4.00 80
9 Brandeis A W 365-190 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
10 MIT B W 360-165 1.0 2 3 0 20 3.00 60
11 Harvard A W 295-230 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 60
Total 11.0 12 40 4 220 2.55 560

Jeffrey, Harvard C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis C W 450-35 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Columbia B W 300-285 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Rochester W 365-135 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
4 Amherst A W 280-205 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 MIT A W 350-175 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Wesleyan L 230-295 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Illinois A L 265-320 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
8 Belmont W 425-95 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
9 Brandeis A W 365-190 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 MIT B W 360-165 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
11 Harvard A W 295-230 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 11.0 1 3 2 220 0.16 35

Thomas Gioia, Harvard C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis C W 450-35 1.0 3 11 1 20 7.50 150
2 Columbia B W 300-285 1.0 1 7 2 20 3.75 75
3 Rochester W 365-135 1.0 1 5 2 20 2.75 55
4 Amherst A W 280-205 1.0 2 4 2 20 3.00 60
5 MIT A W 350-175 1.0 1 5 2 20 2.75 55
6 Wesleyan L 230-295 1.0 0 5 2 20 2.00 40
7 Illinois A L 265-320 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
8 Belmont W 425-95 1.0 3 4 1 20 4.00 80
9 Brandeis A W 365-190 1.0 1 9 1 20 5.00 100
10 MIT B W 360-165 1.0 1 7 1 20 4.00 80
11 Harvard A W 295-230 1.0 2 4 1 20 3.25 65
Total 11.0 15 64 17 220 3.55 780

Iain Carpenter, Illinois A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brown W 330-265 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
2 NYU A W 300-235 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 65
3 Brandeis E W 330-95 1.0 1 3 3 20 1.50 30
4 MIT C W 410-80 1.0 0 5 2 20 2.00 40
5 Belmont W 375-125 1.0 2 3 3 20 2.25 45
6 Belmont W 305-160 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
7 Harvard C W 320-265 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
8 MIT B W 315-260 1.0 2 1 3 20 1.25 25
9 Wesleyan L 235-295 1.0 0 5 2 20 2.00 40
10 Brandeis A L 255-325 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
11 Harvard B L 155-310 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
Total 11.0 7 36 19 220 1.68 370

Karthik Prasad, Illinois A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brown W 330-265 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
2 NYU A W 300-235 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
3 Brandeis E W 330-95 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 15
4 MIT C W 410-80 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 Belmont W 375-125 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Belmont W 305-160 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 -10
7 Harvard C W 320-265 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 MIT B W 315-260 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Wesleyan L 235-295 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Brandeis A L 255-325 1.0 3 1 0 20 2.75 55
11 Harvard B L 155-310 1.0 0 1 3 20 -0.25 -5
Total 11.0 5 10 9 220 0.59 130

Mitch McCullar, Illinois A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brown W 330-265 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
2 NYU A W 300-235 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
3 Brandeis E W 330-95 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
4 MIT C W 410-80 1.0 2 3 0 20 3.00 60
5 Belmont W 375-125 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
6 Belmont W 305-160 1.0 2 2 2 20 2.00 40
7 Harvard C W 320-265 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
8 MIT B W 315-260 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
9 Wesleyan L 235-295 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
10 Brandeis A L 255-325 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
11 Harvard B L 155-310 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
Total 11.0 11 31 6 220 2.02 445

Olivia Kiser, Illinois A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brown W 330-265 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 NYU A W 300-235 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
3 Brandeis E W 330-95 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
4 MIT C W 410-80 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 10
5 Belmont W 375-125 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
6 Belmont W 305-160 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
7 Harvard C W 320-265 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
8 MIT B W 315-260 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
9 Wesleyan L 235-295 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
Total 9.0 3 11 6 180 0.69 125

Dylan Bowman, Illinois B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Wesleyan W 330-225 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
2 Bowdoin W 270-210 1.0 2 3 3 20 2.25 45
3 Harvard A L 190-325 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Brandeis B W 360-175 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
5 Yale B W 460-55 1.0 2 4 2 20 3.00 60
6 MIT A L 260-280 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
7 Cornell A L 205-395 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
8 Harvard B L 180-355 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
9 Yale A L 155-300 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
10 Harvard A L 155-450 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
11 Belmont W 270-250 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
Total 11.0 6 28 14 220 1.36 300

Mike Hu, Illinois B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Wesleyan W 330-225 1.0 3 2 0 20 3.25 65
2 Bowdoin W 270-210 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
3 Harvard A L 190-325 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 Brandeis B W 360-175 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
5 Yale B W 460-55 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
6 MIT A L 260-280 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
7 Cornell A L 205-395 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 Harvard B L 180-355 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Yale A L 155-300 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
10 Harvard A L 155-450 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
11 Belmont W 270-250 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
Total 11.0 8 19 3 220 1.34 295

Patrick Minsker, Illinois B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Wesleyan W 330-225 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
2 Bowdoin W 270-210 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
3 Harvard A L 190-325 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
4 Brandeis B W 360-175 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
5 Yale B W 460-55 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
6 MIT A L 260-280 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
7 Cornell A L 205-395 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Harvard B L 180-355 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
9 Yale A L 155-300 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Harvard A L 155-450 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
11 Belmont W 270-250 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 50
Total 11.0 5 24 0 220 1.43 315

Sasha, Illinois B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Wesleyan W 330-225 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
2 Bowdoin W 270-210 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Brandeis B W 360-175 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
5 Yale B W 460-55 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
6 MIT A L 260-280 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
7 Cornell A L 205-395 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
8 Harvard B L 180-355 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Yale A L 155-300 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
10 Harvard A L 155-450 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
11 Belmont W 270-250 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 2 11 1 200 0.68 135

David Do, MIT A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia B W 355-130 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
2 Rochester W 390-100 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
3 Amherst A W 510-95 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
4 Brandeis C W 435-120 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
5 Harvard C L 175-350 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Illinois B W 280-260 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
7 Harvard B W 290-275 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Harvard A L 230-415 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Cornell A L 220-420 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
10 Yale A L 280-340 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
11 MIT B L 140-345 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 11.0 5 10 3 220 0.73 160

David Gomez, MIT A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia B W 355-130 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
2 Rochester W 390-100 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
3 Amherst A W 510-95 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
4 Brandeis C W 435-120 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Harvard C L 175-350 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Illinois B W 280-260 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Harvard B W 290-275 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
8 Harvard A L 230-415 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Cornell A L 220-420 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Yale A L 280-340 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 10
11 MIT B L 140-345 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
Total 11.0 1 14 4 220 0.61 135

Grace Liu, MIT A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia B W 355-130 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
2 Rochester W 390-100 1.0 1 3 2 20 1.75 35
3 Amherst A W 510-95 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
4 Brandeis C W 435-120 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 65
5 Harvard C L 175-350 1.0 0 4 3 20 1.25 25
6 Illinois B W 280-260 1.0 3 2 3 20 2.50 50
7 Harvard B W 290-275 1.0 2 5 0 20 4.00 80
8 Harvard A L 230-415 1.0 2 2 1 20 2.25 45
9 Cornell A L 220-420 1.0 2 1 3 20 1.25 25
10 Yale A L 280-340 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
11 MIT B L 140-345 1.0 0 4 5 20 0.75 15
Total 11.0 12 39 18 220 2.18 480

Swapnil Garg, MIT A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Columbia B W 355-130 1.0 1 3 2 20 1.75 35
2 Rochester W 390-100 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
3 Amherst A W 510-95 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
4 Brandeis C W 435-120 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
5 Harvard C L 175-350 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
6 Illinois B W 280-260 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
7 Harvard B W 290-275 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
8 Harvard A L 230-415 1.0 1 2 2 20 1.25 25
9 Cornell A L 220-420 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Yale A L 280-340 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
11 MIT B L 140-345 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 -10
Total 11.0 3 28 13 220 1.18 260

Katherine Lei, MIT B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis D W 455-15 1.0 1 6 0 20 3.75 75
2 Amherst B W 400-80 1.0 1 6 1 20 3.50 70
3 NYU C W 440-40 1.0 0 7 1 20 3.25 65
4 Yale A W 320-150 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
5 Cornell A W 335-250 1.0 2 5 0 20 4.00 80
6 Brandeis A L 285-315 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
7 Wesleyan L 190-300 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
8 Illinois A L 260-315 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
9 Belmont W 415-85 1.0 2 3 1 20 2.75 55
10 Harvard C L 165-360 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
11 MIT A W 345-140 1.0 1 7 0 20 4.25 85
Total 11.0 10 52 4 220 2.95 650

Mihir Khambete, MIT B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis D W 455-15 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
2 Amherst B W 400-80 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
3 NYU C W 440-40 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
4 Yale A W 320-150 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
5 Cornell A W 335-250 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Brandeis A L 285-315 1.0 3 0 0 20 2.25 45
7 Wesleyan L 190-300 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
8 Illinois A L 260-315 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
9 Belmont W 415-85 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Harvard C L 165-360 1.0 0 0 3 20 -0.75 -15
Total 10.0 5 12 8 200 0.78 155

Steven Liu, MIT B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis D W 455-15 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
2 Amherst B W 400-80 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
3 NYU C W 440-40 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
4 Yale A W 320-150 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
5 Cornell A W 335-250 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
6 Brandeis A L 285-315 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
7 Wesleyan L 190-300 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Illinois A L 260-315 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Belmont W 415-85 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
10 Harvard C L 165-360 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
11 MIT A W 345-140 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 11.0 3 19 3 220 1.00 220

Vincent Fan, MIT B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Brandeis D W 455-15 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
2 Amherst B W 400-80 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
3 NYU C W 440-40 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
4 Yale A W 320-150 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
5 Cornell A W 335-250 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Brandeis A L 285-315 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 Wesleyan L 190-300 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Illinois A L 260-315 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Belmont W 415-85 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
10 Harvard C L 165-360 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
11 MIT A W 345-140 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
Total 11.0 5 26 3 220 1.45 320

Alan Zhu, MIT C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU A L 125-310 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
2 Belmont L 65-350 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Brown L 60-325 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Illinois A L 80-410 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Brandeis E W 145-130 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Brandeis D W 285-50 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 65
7 NYU B W 220-200 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
9 Brandeis C W 270-110 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Brandeis E W 325-40 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
Total 9.0 2 20 0 180 1.28 230

Mindy Long, MIT C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU A L 125-310 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 -10
2 Belmont L 65-350 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
3 Brown L 60-325 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Illinois A L 80-410 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Brandeis E W 145-130 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
6 Brandeis D W 285-50 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
7 NYU B W 220-200 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
9 Brandeis C W 270-110 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
Total 8.0 0 11 8 160 0.44 70

Wayne Zhao, MIT C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU A L 125-310 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
2 Belmont L 65-350 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Brown L 60-325 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 20
4 Illinois A L 80-410 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 Brandeis E W 145-130 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
6 Brandeis D W 285-50 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
7 NYU B W 220-200 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 60
9 Brandeis C W 270-110 1.0 1 6 2 20 3.25 65
10 Brandeis E W 325-40 1.0 1 7 0 20 4.25 85
Total 9.0 4 36 5 180 2.19 395

Bella Carlo, MIT D

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU B W 235-130 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Columbia A L 95-405 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Brandeis A L 60-465 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Cornell B L 140-245 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Harvard B L 110-395 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
6 NYU A L 45-255 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 -10
7 NYU C L 125-210 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Brandeis B L 125-220 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Rochester W 235-150 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Amherst B W 190-145 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
Total 10.0 2 7 2 200 0.45 90

Ragulan Sivakumar, MIT D

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU B W 235-130 1.0 0 7 1 20 3.25 65
2 Columbia A L 95-405 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 15
3 Brandeis A L 60-465 1.0 0 2 4 20 0.00 0
4 Cornell B L 140-245 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
5 Harvard B L 110-395 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
6 NYU A L 45-255 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
7 NYU C L 125-210 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 55
8 Brandeis B L 125-220 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 45
9 Rochester W 235-150 1.0 1 8 4 20 3.75 75
10 Amherst B W 190-145 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 45
Total 10.0 4 43 16 200 2.05 410

Tai Zheng, MIT D

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU B W 235-130 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Columbia A L 95-405 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Brandeis A L 60-465 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Cornell B L 140-245 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Harvard B L 110-395 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
6 NYU A L 45-255 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 NYU C L 125-210 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Brandeis B L 125-220 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
9 Rochester W 235-150 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 Amherst B W 190-145 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 0 11 2 200 0.50 100

Danny Richardson, NYU A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT C W 310-125 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
2 Illinois A L 235-300 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Belmont L 255-260 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Brandeis E W 350-30 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Brown L 235-295 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 MIT D W 255-45 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
7 Brandeis B W 350-75 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
8 Amherst B W 450-10 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
9 NYU C W 395-80 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Rochester W 250-115 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 3 12 1 200 0.80 160

David Shimshoni, NYU A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT C W 310-125 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Illinois A L 235-300 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Belmont L 255-260 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
4 Brandeis E W 350-30 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 Brown L 235-295 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
6 MIT D W 255-45 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
7 Brandeis B W 350-75 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 40
8 Amherst B W 450-10 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
9 NYU C W 395-80 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
10 Rochester W 250-115 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 3 16 4 200 0.93 185

Doug Simons, NYU A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT C W 310-125 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
2 Illinois A L 235-300 1.0 2 4 0 20 3.50 70
3 Belmont L 255-260 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
4 Brandeis E W 350-30 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 40
5 Brown L 235-295 1.0 3 3 2 20 3.25 65
6 MIT D W 255-45 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
7 Brandeis B W 350-75 1.0 2 5 1 20 3.75 75
8 Amherst B W 450-10 1.0 0 12 0 20 6.00 120
9 NYU C W 395-80 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 70
10 Rochester W 250-115 1.0 2 6 4 20 3.50 70
Total 10.0 12 52 10 200 3.25 650

Lev Bernstein, NYU A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT C W 310-125 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 45
2 Illinois A L 235-300 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
3 Belmont L 255-260 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
4 Brandeis E W 350-30 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
5 Brown L 235-295 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
6 MIT D W 255-45 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Brandeis B W 350-75 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 Amherst B W 450-10 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
9 NYU C W 395-80 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
10 Rochester W 250-115 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 1 22 5 200 1.05 210

Brian Xu, NYU B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT D L 130-235 1.0 1 4 1 20 2.50 50
2 Cornell B L 110-305 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 45
3 Columbia A L 180-365 1.0 0 4 2 20 1.50 30
4 Harvard B L 105-220 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
5 Brandeis A L 195-335 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 55
6 Brandeis E W 130-90 1.0 2 5 0 20 4.00 80
7 MIT C L 200-220 1.0 1 6 1 20 3.50 70
8 Brandeis C L 20-230 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Brandeis D W 210-80 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 9.0 5 32 6 180 2.03 365

Jeffrey Guan, NYU B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT D L 130-235 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
2 Cornell B L 110-305 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
3 Columbia A L 180-365 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Harvard B L 105-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Brandeis A L 195-335 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Brandeis E W 130-90 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 MIT C L 200-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Brandeis C L 20-230 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Brandeis D W 210-80 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
Total 9.0 0 4 2 180 0.17 30

Lillie Connors, NYU B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT D L 130-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 Cornell B L 110-305 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Columbia A L 180-365 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Harvard B L 105-220 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 Brandeis A L 195-335 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Brandeis E W 130-90 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
7 MIT C L 200-220 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Brandeis C L 20-230 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Brandeis D W 210-80 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 9.0 0 5 1 180 0.25 45

Samantha Eng, NYU B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 MIT D L 130-235 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
2 Cornell B L 110-305 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Columbia A L 180-365 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
4 Harvard B L 105-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Brandeis A L 195-335 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
6 Brandeis E W 130-90 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
7 MIT C L 200-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Brandeis C L 20-230 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Brandeis D W 210-80 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
Total 9.0 1 13 1 180 0.78 140

Ben Kaplan, NYU C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Yale A L 95-325 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Brandeis D W 220-95 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 MIT B L 40-440 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Cornell A L 70-475 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
5 Amherst B W 155-135 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Amherst B W 165-95 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
7 MIT D W 210-125 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Rochester W 200-85 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 NYU A L 80-395 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Brandeis B W 210-55 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 0 9 0 200 0.45 90

Caroline Couch, NYU C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Yale A L 95-325 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
2 Brandeis D W 220-95 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
3 MIT B L 40-440 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Cornell A L 70-475 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Amherst B W 155-135 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Amherst B W 165-95 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
7 MIT D W 210-125 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 Rochester W 200-85 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
9 NYU A L 80-395 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
10 Brandeis B W 210-55 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 10
Total 10.0 0 19 3 200 0.88 175

Chandler Littleford, NYU C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Yale A L 95-325 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
2 Brandeis D W 220-95 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 MIT B L 40-440 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Cornell A L 70-475 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Amherst B W 155-135 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
6 Amherst B W 165-95 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
7 MIT D W 210-125 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
8 Rochester W 200-85 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
9 NYU A L 80-395 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
10 Brandeis B W 210-55 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 70
Total 10.0 2 21 2 200 1.15 230

Jennifer Yang, NYU C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Yale A L 95-325 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Brandeis D W 220-95 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
3 MIT B L 40-440 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Cornell A L 70-475 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Amherst B W 155-135 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
6 Amherst B W 165-95 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
7 MIT D W 210-125 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 45
8 Rochester W 200-85 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
9 NYU A L 80-395 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
10 Brandeis B W 210-55 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
Total 10.0 1 19 1 200 1.00 200

Anand Idris, Rochester

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst A L 20-485 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 MIT A L 100-390 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Harvard C L 135-365 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 Columbia B L 40-445 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Brandeis C W 225-115 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
6 Brandeis B L 80-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Amherst B L 150-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 NYU C L 85-200 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 MIT D L 150-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 9.0 0 6 0 180 0.33 60

Bethany Sielski, Rochester

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst A L 20-485 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 MIT A L 100-390 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Harvard C L 135-365 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Columbia B L 40-445 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Brandeis C W 225-115 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Brandeis B L 80-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Amherst B L 150-220 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 NYU C L 85-200 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 MIT D L 150-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 NYU A L 115-250 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 0 1 0 200 0.05 10

Michael Lansford, Rochester

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst A L 20-485 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 MIT A L 100-390 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Harvard C L 135-365 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
4 Columbia B L 40-445 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Brandeis C W 225-115 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 70
6 Brandeis B L 80-235 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
7 Amherst B L 150-220 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 50
8 NYU C L 85-200 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
9 MIT D L 150-235 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 60
10 NYU A L 115-250 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 55
Total 10.0 1 38 2 200 1.93 385

Nathan Miner, Rochester

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Amherst A L 20-485 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
2 MIT A L 100-390 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
3 Harvard C L 135-365 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Columbia B L 40-445 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Brandeis C W 225-115 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
6 Brandeis B L 80-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Amherst B L 150-220 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 NYU C L 85-200 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 MIT D L 150-235 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 NYU A L 115-250 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 0 4 1 200 0.17 35

Derek Chen, Wesleyan

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois B L 225-330 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
2 Yale B W 375-125 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
3 Bowdoin W 370-120 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
4 Harvard A L 280-290 1.0 0 4 1 21 1.67 35
5 Brandeis B W 450-55 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
6 Harvard C W 295-230 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
7 MIT B W 300-190 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 Brandeis A L 205-360 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
9 Illinois A W 295-235 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
10 Belmont W 280-175 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 25
11 Yale A W 310-185 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 11.0 1 31 7 221 1.31 290

Matt D'Annunzio, Wesleyan

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois B L 225-330 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Yale B W 375-125 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
3 Bowdoin W 370-120 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
4 Harvard A L 280-290 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 0
5 Brandeis B W 450-55 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Harvard C W 295-230 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 15
7 MIT B W 300-190 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Brandeis A L 205-360 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
9 Illinois A W 295-235 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
10 Belmont W 280-175 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
11 Yale A W 310-185 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 11.0 1 12 0 221 0.61 135

Maximilian Shatan, Wesleyan

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois B L 225-330 1.0 1 4 2 20 2.25 45
2 Yale B W 375-125 1.0 2 6 2 20 4.00 80
3 Bowdoin W 370-120 1.0 1 7 3 20 3.50 70
4 Harvard A L 280-290 1.0 2 4 1 21 3.10 65
5 Brandeis B W 450-55 1.0 2 6 2 20 4.00 80
6 Harvard C W 295-230 1.0 0 5 3 20 1.75 35
7 MIT B W 300-190 1.0 1 7 3 20 3.50 70
8 Brandeis A L 205-360 1.0 1 2 2 20 1.25 25
9 Illinois A W 295-235 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 Belmont W 280-175 1.0 4 4 3 20 4.25 85
11 Yale A W 310-185 1.0 4 5 0 20 5.50 110
Total 11.0 18 50 21 221 3.01 665

Nicole Lee, Wesleyan

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Illinois B L 225-330 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 -5
2 Yale B W 375-125 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Bowdoin W 370-120 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 Harvard A L 280-290 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 0
5 Brandeis B W 450-55 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
6 Harvard C W 295-230 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 25
7 MIT B W 300-190 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
8 Brandeis A L 205-360 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Illinois A W 295-235 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
10 Belmont W 280-175 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
11 Yale A W 310-185 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 11.0 3 8 2 221 0.52 115

DMA, Yale A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
2 Cornell A W 310-210 1.0 0 8 2 20 3.50 70
6 Harvard B W 280-240 1.0 1 7 1 20 4.00 80
7 Harvard A L 210-385 1.0 1 5 3 20 2.50 50
8 Cornell A W 295-285 1.0 2 8 1 21 5.00 105
9 Illinois B W 300-155 1.0 2 7 3 20 4.25 85
10 MIT A W 340-280 1.0 4 4 5 20 3.75 75
11 Wesleyan L 185-310 1.0 0 7 5 20 2.25 45
Total 7.0 10 46 20 141 3.62 510

Jordan Davidsen, Yale A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU C W 325-95 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 30
2 Cornell A W 310-210 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Amherst B W 280-220 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
4 MIT B L 150-320 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Brandeis D W 415-10 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
6 Harvard B W 280-240 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
8 Cornell A W 295-285 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 0
9 Illinois B W 300-155 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
10 MIT A W 340-280 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 0
11 Wesleyan L 185-310 0.5 0 1 1 10 0.50 5
Total 9.0 2 18 3 181 1.08 195

Matt Pecoraro, Yale A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU C W 325-95 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
2 Cornell A W 310-210 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Amherst B W 280-220 1.0 0 2 3 20 0.25 5
4 MIT B L 150-320 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Brandeis D W 415-10 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 70
6 Harvard B W 280-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Harvard A L 210-385 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
8 Cornell A W 295-285 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 0
10 MIT A W 340-280 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
11 Wesleyan L 185-310 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 10.0 0 14 4 201 0.60 120

Mauricio Gonzalez Sanchez, Yale A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU C W 325-95 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
2 Cornell A W 310-210 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Amherst B W 280-220 1.0 1 5 2 20 2.75 55
4 MIT B L 150-320 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 35
5 Brandeis D W 415-10 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 55
7 Harvard A L 210-385 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
8 Cornell A W 295-285 1.0 0 1 0 21 0.48 10
9 Illinois B W 300-155 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
10 MIT A W 340-280 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 35
11 Wesleyan L 185-310 0.5 1 0 0 10 1.50 15
Total 9.5 3 27 4 191 1.54 295

Sebastian Torres, Yale A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 NYU C W 325-95 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Amherst B W 280-220 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 MIT B L 150-320 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
5 Brandeis D W 415-10 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
6 Harvard B W 280-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
7 Harvard A L 210-385 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
9 Illinois B W 300-155 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
10 MIT A W 340-280 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 0
11 Wesleyan L 185-310 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
Total 8.5 0 3 0 170 0.18 30

Ben Cifu, Yale B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard A L 60-530 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0
2 Wesleyan L 125-375 1.0 1 2 2 20 1.25 25
3 Brandeis B L 130-190 1.0 0 2 4 20 0.00 0
4 Bowdoin L 115-255 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 30
5 Illinois B L 55-460 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
6 Brandeis C L 135-150 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 55
7 Brandeis D W 140-50 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 20
Total 7.0 1 18 11 140 1.00 140

Kassandra Haakman, Yale B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard A L 60-530 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Wesleyan L 125-375 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 0
3 Brandeis B L 130-190 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
4 Bowdoin L 115-255 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
5 Illinois B L 55-460 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 5
6 Brandeis C L 135-150 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
7 Brandeis D W 140-50 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 70
Total 7.0 0 13 1 140 0.89 125

Nico Brayton, Yale B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pts
1 Harvard A L 60-530 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
2 Wesleyan L 125-375 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 20
3 Brandeis B L 130-190 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 40
4 Bowdoin L 115-255 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 15
5 Illinois B L 55-460 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 10
Total 5.0 0 10 1 100 0.95 95

Made with YellowFruit 🍌