2020 ACF Winter Midwest on November 07, 2020 Statistics report for Combined
Standings Individuals Scoreboard Team Detail Individual Detail Round Report

Individual Detail

     Prelims
     Playoffs

Adam Klein, Chicago A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
8 Illinois A W 440-175 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
9 Chicago B W 440-175 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 9.0 19 1 180 1.03 19.00 185

Daniel Yang, Chicago A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 6.00 55
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
8 Illinois A W 440-175 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
9 Chicago B W 440-175 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 9.0 31 5 180 1.58 6.20 285

John Marvin, Chicago A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 8.00 75
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 —  90
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 2 5 20 -0.25 0.40 -5
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
8 Illinois A W 440-175 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 —  70
9 Chicago B W 440-175 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 9.0 47 9 180 2.36 5.22 425

Sam Moore, Chicago A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.33 -5
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
8 Illinois A W 440-175 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
9 Chicago B W 440-175 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 9.0 25 5 180 1.25 5.00 225

Cooper Komatsu, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
8 Illinois B L 195-335 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 6.0 0 0 120 0.00 —  0

Robert Condron, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 4.00 70
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 9 2 20 4.00 4.50 80
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 7 3 20 2.75 2.33 55
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 4.00 70
8 Illinois B L 195-335 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
9 Chicago A L 175-440 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 8.0 54 12 160 3.00 4.50 480

Vivek Sasse, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
8 Illinois B L 195-335 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
9 Chicago A L 175-440 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
Total 8.0 30 3 160 1.78 10.00 285

Yohhan Kumarasinghe, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 Illinois B L 195-335 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
9 Chicago A L 175-440 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 8.0 10 3 160 0.53 3.33 85

Jeffrey Han, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
8 Purdue A L 95-360 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
9 WUSTL C L 170-300 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
Total 9.0 13 6 180 0.56 2.17 100

Ken Johnson, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
8 Purdue A L 95-360 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
9 WUSTL C L 170-300 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
Total 9.0 24 9 180 1.08 2.67 195

Shiv Sheshan, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 5 3 20 1.75 1.67 35
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 7.00 65
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
8 Purdue A L 95-360 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
9 WUSTL C L 170-300 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
Total 9.0 40 14 180 1.83 2.86 330

Steven Schmidt, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 Purdue A L 95-360 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
9 WUSTL C L 170-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 8.0 3 0 160 0.19 —  30

Alex Lapuente, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
8 Purdue D W 365--10 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
9 Purdue B L 220-240 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 9.0 8 2 180 0.39 4.00 70

Ben Scott, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
8 Purdue D W 365--10 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 Purdue B L 220-240 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 9.0 15 3 180 0.75 5.00 135

Dennis Reppen, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
8 Purdue D W 365--10 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
9 Purdue B L 220-240 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 9.0 31 3 180 1.64 10.33 295

Tejo Velagapudi, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
8 Purdue D W 365--10 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 8.00 75
9 Purdue B L 220-240 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
Total 9.0 40 6 180 2.06 6.67 370

Jack Idler, DePaul A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
4 Purdue D L 120-155 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Purdue A L 130-360 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 Purdue C L 115-185 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
10 WUSTL D W 270-45 1.0 10 0 20 5.00 —  100
Total 8.0 33 5 160 1.91 6.60 305

Joah Rosing, DePaul A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 4.0 1 2 80 0.00 0.50 0

Kyle Asta, DePaul A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 2 3 20 0.25 0.67 5
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
4 Purdue D L 120-155 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Purdue A L 130-360 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
9 Purdue C L 115-185 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
10 WUSTL D W 270-45 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 8.0 19 5 160 1.03 3.80 165

Iain Carpenter, Illinois A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 6 3 20 2.25 2.00 45
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 3 3 20 0.75 1.00 15
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 9 2 20 4.00 4.50 80
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
8 Chicago A L 175-440 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
9 Illinois B W 320-275 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
Total 8.0 38 12 160 2.00 3.17 320

Karthik Prasad, Illinois A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 0.4 0 0 8 0.00 —  0
8 Chicago A L 175-440 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
9 Illinois B W 320-275 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 7.4 9 3 148 0.51 3.00 75

Mitch McCullar, Illinois A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
8 Chicago A L 175-440 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 Illinois B W 320-275 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
Total 8.0 29 5 160 1.66 5.80 265

Patrick Minsker, Illinois A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
8 Chicago A L 175-440 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
9 Illinois B W 320-275 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 8.0 16 2 160 0.94 8.00 150

Arjun Panickssery, Illinois B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 2 3 20 0.25 0.67 5
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
8 Chicago B W 335-195 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 Illinois A L 275-320 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 9.0 13 7 180 0.53 1.86 95

Dylan Bowman, Illinois B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 6 4 20 2.00 1.50 40
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 7.00 65
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
8 Chicago B W 335-195 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
9 Illinois A L 275-320 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
Total 9.0 44 11 180 2.14 4.00 385

Mike Hu, Illinois B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
8 Chicago B W 335-195 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 Illinois A L 275-320 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 9.0 20 0 180 1.11 —  200

Sarod Nori, Illinois B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
8 Chicago B W 335-195 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
9 Illinois A L 275-320 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 9.0 27 6 180 1.33 4.50 240

Alex Pijanowski, Purdue A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 6 2 20 2.50 3.00 50
8 Chicago C W 360-95 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
9 WUSTL A L 245-290 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 8.0 46 9 160 2.59 5.11 415

Drew Benner, Purdue A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
8 Chicago C W 360-95 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 WUSTL A L 245-290 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
Total 8.0 20 9 160 0.97 2.22 155

Matt Schiavone, Purdue A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
8 Chicago C W 360-95 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
9 WUSTL A L 245-290 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 8.0 9 1 160 0.53 9.00 85

Pranav Veluri, Purdue A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
8 Chicago C W 360-95 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
9 WUSTL A L 245-290 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 8.0 20 2 160 1.19 10.00 190

Ben Dahl, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
8 WUSTL B W 360-140 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 —  70
9 Chicago D W 240-220 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 —  70
Total 8.0 39 6 160 2.25 6.50 360

Justin Chen, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
8 WUSTL B W 360-140 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
9 Chicago D W 240-220 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
Total 8.0 21 5 160 1.16 4.20 185

Truman Bennet, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
8 WUSTL B W 360-140 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
9 Chicago D W 240-220 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 8.0 11 8 160 0.44 1.38 70

Ian Brown, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 WUSTL D W 240-30 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 DePaul A W 185-115 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
Total 9.0 7 2 180 0.33 3.50 60

Mason Minnich, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
8 WUSTL D W 240-30 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
9 DePaul A W 185-115 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 9.0 12 3 180 0.58 4.00 105

Minh-Khanh Phung, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
8 WUSTL D W 240-30 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 7.00 65
9 DePaul A W 185-115 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 9.0 29 3 180 1.53 9.67 275

Richard Li, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
8 WUSTL D W 240-30 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
9 DePaul A W 185-115 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 9.0 11 2 180 0.56 5.50 100

David Mathew, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
8 Chicago D L -10-365 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
9 WUSTL B W 175-170 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 8.0 3 2 160 0.13 1.50 20

Drew Jensen, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 Chicago D L -10-365 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
9 WUSTL B W 175-170 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 8.0 5 0 160 0.31 —  50

Seth Honnigford, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.33 -5
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
8 Chicago D L -10-365 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
9 WUSTL B W 175-170 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 8.0 13 7 160 0.59 1.86 95

Tim Fuller, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
8 Chicago D L -10-365 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
9 WUSTL B W 175-170 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
Total 8.0 21 4 160 1.19 5.25 190

Athena Kern, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
8 WUSTL C W 480-85 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 4.00 70
9 Purdue A W 290-245 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
Total 9.0 53 8 180 2.72 6.63 490

Cyrus Zhou, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
8 WUSTL C W 480-85 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
9 Purdue A W 290-245 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
Total 9.0 23 7 180 1.08 3.29 195

Rohan Rai, WUSTL A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
8 WUSTL C W 480-85 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 Purdue A W 290-245 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 9.0 25 1 180 1.36 25.00 245

Sarah Vo, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 0 4 20 -1.00 0.00 -20
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 WUSTL C W 480-85 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
9 Purdue A W 290-245 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
Total 9.0 11 12 180 0.28 0.92 50

Ben McKane, WUSTL B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
8 Purdue B L 140-360 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
9 Purdue D L 170-175 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 9.0 4 0 180 0.22 —  40

Hannah Manoj, WUSTL B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
8 Purdue B L 140-360 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
9 Purdue D L 170-175 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 9.0 12 0 180 0.67 —  120

Jeremy Cummings, WUSTL B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 —  90
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
8 Purdue B L 140-360 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
9 Purdue D L 170-175 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 9.0 38 7 180 1.92 5.43 345

Nash Overfield, WUSTL B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
8 Purdue B L 140-360 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
9 Purdue D L 170-175 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 9.0 11 4 180 0.50 2.75 90

Aryaman Jaiswal, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 8.00 75
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 6.00 55
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 11 0 20 5.50 —  110
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
8 WUSTL A L 85-480 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
9 Chicago C W 300-170 1.0 7 0 20 3.50 —  70
Total 8.0 45 3 160 2.72 15.00 435

Mia Bloss, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 WUSTL A L 85-480 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
9 Chicago C W 300-170 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 8.0 13 0 160 0.81 —  130

Noah Dinitz, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
8 WUSTL A L 85-480 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
9 Chicago C W 300-170 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 8.0 6 4 160 0.25 1.50 40

Ved Patel, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 WUSTL A L 85-480 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
9 Chicago C W 300-170 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 8.0 9 1 160 0.53 9.00 85

Jonah Schwartz, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 2 4 20 0.00 0.50 0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
8 Purdue C L 30-240 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 8.0 9 7 160 0.34 1.29 55

Josh Towns, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
8 Purdue C L 30-240 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 7.0 2 2 140 0.07 1.00 10

Ryan Xu, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 4 1 140 0.25 4.00 35

Spencer Lehmann, WUSTL D

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
8 Purdue C L 30-240 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
10 DePaul A L 45-270 1.0 3 3 20 0.75 1.00 15
Total 9.0 20 8 180 0.89 2.50 160

Made with YellowFruit 🍌