hsquizbowl logo

The Quizbowl Resource Center

Sponsored by the Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence

2020 ACF Winter Midwest on November 07, 2020 Statistics report for Prelims
Standings Individuals Scoreboard Team Detail Individual Detail Round Report

Individual Detail

Adam Klein, Chicago A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 16 1 140 1.11 16.00 155

Daniel Yang, Chicago A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 6.00 55
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 7.0 25 5 140 1.61 5.00 225

John Marvin, Chicago A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 8.00 75
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 —  90
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 2 5 20 -0.25 0.40 -5
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 7.0 36 9 140 2.25 4.00 315

Sam Moore, Chicago A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.33 -5
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 7.0 17 5 140 1.04 3.40 145

Cooper Komatsu, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 5.0 0 0 100 0.00 —  0

Robert Condron, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 4.00 70
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 9 2 20 4.00 4.50 80
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 7 3 20 2.75 2.33 55
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 4.00 70
Total 6.0 46 9 120 3.46 5.11 415

Vivek Sasse, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 6.0 25 0 120 2.08 —  250

Yohhan Kumarasinghe, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 9 3 120 0.63 3.00 75

Jeffrey Han, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 7.0 11 4 140 0.64 2.75 90

Ken Johnson, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
Total 7.0 21 5 140 1.32 4.20 185

Shiv Sheshan, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 5 3 20 1.75 1.67 35
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 7.00 65
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
Total 7.0 34 11 140 2.04 3.09 285

Steven Schmidt, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 3 0 120 0.25 —  30

Alex Lapuente, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 7 2 140 0.43 3.50 60

Ben Scott, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 7.0 10 3 140 0.61 3.33 85

Dennis Reppen, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
Total 7.0 23 3 140 1.54 7.67 215

Tejo Velagapudi, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
Total 7.0 28 3 140 1.89 9.33 265

Jack Idler, DePaul A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
4 Purdue D L 120-155 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Purdue A L 130-360 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 6.0 20 5 120 1.46 4.00 175

Joah Rosing, DePaul A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 4.0 1 2 80 0.00 0.50 0

Kyle Asta, DePaul A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 2 3 20 0.25 0.67 5
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
4 Purdue D L 120-155 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Purdue A L 130-360 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 14 4 120 1.00 3.50 120

Iain Carpenter, Illinois A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 6 3 20 2.25 2.00 45
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 3 3 20 0.75 1.00 15
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 9 2 20 4.00 4.50 80
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 6.0 32 9 120 2.29 3.56 275

Karthik Prasad, Illinois A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 0.4 0 0 8 0.00 —  0
Total 5.4 8 3 108 0.60 2.67 65

Mitch McCullar, Illinois A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
Total 6.0 23 4 120 1.75 5.75 210

Patrick Minsker, Illinois A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 6.0 12 1 120 0.96 12.00 115

Arjun Panickssery, Illinois B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 2 3 20 0.25 0.67 5
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
Total 7.0 8 7 140 0.32 1.14 45

Dylan Bowman, Illinois B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 6 4 20 2.00 1.50 40
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 7.00 65
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
Total 7.0 37 9 140 2.32 4.11 325

Mike Hu, Illinois B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 7.0 15 0 140 1.07 —  150

Sarod Nori, Illinois B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
Total 7.0 24 6 140 1.50 4.00 210

Alex Pijanowski, Purdue A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 6 2 20 2.50 3.00 50
Total 6.0 33 7 120 2.46 4.71 295

Drew Benner, Purdue A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
Total 6.0 16 7 120 1.04 2.29 125

Matt Schiavone, Purdue A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 6 1 120 0.46 6.00 55

Pranav Veluri, Purdue A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 17 1 120 1.38 17.00 165

Ben Dahl, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 25 6 120 1.83 4.17 220

Justin Chen, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 6.0 14 3 120 1.04 4.67 125

Truman Bennet, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 6.0 8 6 120 0.42 1.33 50

Ian Brown, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 7.0 3 1 140 0.18 3.00 25

Mason Minnich, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 7.0 8 2 140 0.50 4.00 70

Minh-Khanh Phung, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 7.0 19 2 140 1.29 9.50 180

Richard Li, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 7.0 7 2 140 0.43 3.50 60

David Mathew, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 6.0 2 1 120 0.13 2.00 15

Drew Jensen, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 3 0 120 0.25 —  30

Seth Honnigford, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.33 -5
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 6.0 10 7 120 0.54 1.43 65

Tim Fuller, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 6.0 19 2 120 1.50 9.50 180

Athena Kern, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
Total 7.0 39 6 140 2.57 6.50 360

Cyrus Zhou, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
Total 7.0 17 5 140 1.04 3.40 145

Rohan Rai, WUSTL A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 7.0 22 1 140 1.54 22.00 215

Sarah Vo, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 0 4 20 -1.00 0.00 -20
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 7.0 9 10 140 0.29 0.90 40

Ben McKane, WUSTL B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 4 0 140 0.29 —  40

Hannah Manoj, WUSTL B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 9 0 140 0.64 —  90

Jeremy Cummings, WUSTL B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 —  90
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
Total 7.0 31 5 140 2.04 6.20 285

Nash Overfield, WUSTL B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 9 4 140 0.50 2.25 70

Aryaman Jaiswal, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 8.00 75
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 6.00 55
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 11 0 20 5.50 —  110
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 6.0 35 3 120 2.79 11.67 335

Mia Bloss, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 8 0 120 0.67 —  80

Noah Dinitz, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
Total 6.0 5 3 120 0.29 1.67 35

Ved Patel, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 9 1 120 0.71 9.00 85

Jonah Schwartz, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 2 4 20 0.00 0.50 0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 7.0 9 7 140 0.39 1.29 55

Josh Towns, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
Total 6.0 2 1 120 0.13 2.00 15

Ryan Xu, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 4 1 140 0.25 4.00 35

Spencer Lehmann, WUSTL D

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
Total 7.0 15 4 140 0.93 3.75 130

Made with YellowFruit 🍌

Quizbowl Resource Center Database © 2011-2020 hsquizbowl.org

Database application maintained by Dan Goff and Jeffrey Hill
Packet uploads managed by Jeffrey Hill