2020 ACF Winter Midwest on November 07, 2020 Statistics report for Prelims
Standings Individuals Scoreboard Team Detail Individual Detail Round Report

Individual Detail

Adam Klein, Chicago A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 16 1 140 1.11 16.00 155

Daniel Yang, Chicago A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 6.00 55
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 7.0 25 5 140 1.61 5.00 225

John Marvin, Chicago A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 8.00 75
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 —  90
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 2 5 20 -0.25 0.40 -5
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 7.0 36 9 140 2.25 4.00 315

Sam Moore, Chicago A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue C W 540-60 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago D W 430-115 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.33 -5
3 Chicago C W 500-90 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL D W 615-35 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 WUSTL B W 300-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL A W 230-215 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Illinois B W 295-255 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 7.0 17 5 140 1.04 3.40 145

Cooper Komatsu, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 5.0 0 0 100 0.00 —  0

Robert Condron, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 4.00 70
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 9 2 20 4.00 4.50 80
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 7 3 20 2.75 2.33 55
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 8 2 20 3.50 4.00 70
Total 6.0 46 9 120 3.46 5.11 415

Vivek Sasse, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 6.0 25 0 120 2.08 —  250

Yohhan Kumarasinghe, Chicago B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue D W 470-120 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 DePaul A W 405-80 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
3 Illinois A W 355-280 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 WUSTL C W 460-80 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Purdue A W 290-285 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Purdue B W 350-115 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 9 3 120 0.63 3.00 75

Jeffrey Han, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 7.0 11 4 140 0.64 2.75 90

Ken Johnson, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
Total 7.0 21 5 140 1.32 4.20 185

Shiv Sheshan, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 5 3 20 1.75 1.67 35
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 7.00 65
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
6 Illinois B L 180-400 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
Total 7.0 34 11 140 2.04 3.09 285

Steven Schmidt, Chicago C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL B W 235-210 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL D W 350-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Chicago A L 90-500 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Chicago D W 290-240 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Purdue C W 350-75 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL A L 205-295 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 3 0 120 0.25 —  30

Alex Lapuente, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 7 2 140 0.43 3.50 60

Ben Scott, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 7.0 10 3 140 0.61 3.33 85

Dennis Reppen, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
Total 7.0 23 3 140 1.54 7.67 215

Tejo Velagapudi, Chicago D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL A L 175-390 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 Chicago A L 115-430 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL D W 310-65 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
4 Chicago C L 240-290 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 Illinois B L 240-345 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Purdue C W 320-150 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
7 WUSTL B W 325-75 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
Total 7.0 28 3 140 1.89 9.33 265

Jack Idler, DePaul A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
4 Purdue D L 120-155 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Purdue A L 130-360 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 6.0 20 5 120 1.46 4.00 175

Joah Rosing, DePaul A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 -10
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 4.0 1 2 80 0.00 0.50 0

Kyle Asta, DePaul A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue B L 70-375 1.0 2 3 20 0.25 0.67 5
2 Chicago B L 80-405 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL C L 170-290 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
4 Purdue D L 120-155 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 Illinois A L 125-390 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Purdue A L 130-360 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 14 4 120 1.00 3.50 120

Iain Carpenter, Illinois A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 6 3 20 2.25 2.00 45
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 3 3 20 0.75 1.00 15
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 9 2 20 4.00 4.50 80
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 6.0 32 9 120 2.29 3.56 275

Karthik Prasad, Illinois A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 0.4 0 0 8 0.00 —  0
Total 5.4 8 3 108 0.60 2.67 65

Mitch McCullar, Illinois A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
Total 6.0 23 4 120 1.75 5.75 210

Patrick Minsker, Illinois A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
2 Purdue B W 460-110 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Chicago B L 280-355 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue A W 355-225 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Purdue D W 440-115 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 DePaul A W 390-125 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL C W 370-145 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
Total 6.0 12 1 120 0.96 12.00 115

Arjun Panickssery, Illinois B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 2 3 20 0.25 0.67 5
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
Total 7.0 8 7 140 0.32 1.14 45

Dylan Bowman, Illinois B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 6 4 20 2.00 1.50 40
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 7 1 20 3.25 7.00 65
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
Total 7.0 37 9 140 2.32 4.11 325

Mike Hu, Illinois B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 7.0 15 0 140 1.07 —  150

Sarod Nori, Illinois B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL D W 290-145 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 WUSTL B W 415-95 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
3 WUSTL A W 335-270 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
4 Purdue C W 410-115 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
5 Chicago D W 345-240 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago C W 400-180 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
7 Chicago A L 255-295 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
Total 7.0 24 6 140 1.50 4.00 210

Alex Pijanowski, Purdue A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 6 2 20 2.50 3.00 50
Total 6.0 33 7 120 2.46 4.71 295

Drew Benner, Purdue A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
Total 6.0 16 7 120 1.04 2.29 125

Matt Schiavone, Purdue A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 6 1 120 0.46 6.00 55

Pranav Veluri, Purdue A

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 WUSTL C W 330-210 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue D W 420-60 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 Illinois A L 225-355 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 Purdue B W 420-135 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
6 Chicago B L 285-290 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 DePaul A W 360-130 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 17 1 120 1.38 17.00 165

Ben Dahl, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 7 2 20 3.00 3.50 60
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
Total 6.0 25 6 120 1.83 4.17 220

Justin Chen, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 6.0 14 3 120 1.04 4.67 125

Truman Bennet, Purdue B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 DePaul A W 375-70 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Illinois A L 110-460 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL C L 110-400 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 Purdue A L 135-420 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
6 Purdue D W 290-130 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 Chicago B L 115-350 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 6.0 8 6 120 0.42 1.33 50

Ian Brown, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 7.0 3 1 140 0.18 3.00 25

Mason Minnich, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 7.0 8 2 140 0.50 4.00 70

Minh-Khanh Phung, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 7.0 19 2 140 1.29 9.50 180

Richard Li, Purdue C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago A L 60-540 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL A L 45-470 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 WUSTL B L 135-320 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Illinois B L 115-410 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
5 Chicago C L 75-350 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Chicago D L 150-320 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 WUSTL D W 275-115 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 7.0 7 2 140 0.43 3.50 60

David Mathew, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 6.0 2 1 120 0.13 2.00 15

Drew Jensen, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 3 0 120 0.25 —  30

Seth Honnigford, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 1 3 20 -0.25 0.33 -5
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
Total 6.0 10 7 120 0.54 1.43 65

Tim Fuller, Purdue D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago B L 120-470 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 WUSTL C L 60-300 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
3 Purdue A L 60-420 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 DePaul A W 155-120 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 Illinois A L 115-440 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
6 Purdue B L 130-290 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
Total 6.0 19 2 120 1.50 9.50 180

Athena Kern, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 8 0 20 4.00 —  80
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 9 1 20 4.25 9.00 85
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
Total 7.0 39 6 140 2.57 6.50 360

Cyrus Zhou, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
Total 7.0 17 5 140 1.04 3.40 145

Rohan Rai, WUSTL A

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
Total 7.0 22 1 140 1.54 22.00 215

Sarah Vo, WUSTL A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago D W 390-175 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
2 Purdue C W 470-45 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
3 Illinois B L 270-335 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL B W 365-160 1.0 0 4 20 -1.00 0.00 -20
5 WUSTL D W 495-10 1.0 4 2 20 1.50 2.00 30
6 Chicago A L 215-230 1.0 1 2 20 0.00 0.50 0
7 Chicago C W 295-205 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 7.0 9 10 140 0.29 0.90 40

Ben McKane, WUSTL B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 4 0 140 0.29 —  40

Hannah Manoj, WUSTL B

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 9 0 140 0.64 —  90

Jeremy Cummings, WUSTL B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 9 0 20 4.50 —  90
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 5 1 20 2.25 5.00 45
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 6 0 20 3.00 —  60
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 4 3 20 1.25 1.33 25
Total 7.0 31 5 140 2.04 6.20 285

Nash Overfield, WUSTL B

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Chicago C L 210-235 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Illinois B L 95-415 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
3 Purdue C W 320-135 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 WUSTL A L 160-365 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
5 Chicago A L 150-300 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
6 WUSTL D W 215-95 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Chicago D L 75-325 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 9 4 140 0.50 2.25 70

Aryaman Jaiswal, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 5 0 20 2.50 —  50
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 8 1 20 3.75 8.00 75
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 6 1 20 2.75 6.00 55
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 11 0 20 5.50 —  110
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 3 0 20 1.50 —  30
Total 6.0 35 3 120 2.79 11.67 335

Mia Bloss, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 8 0 120 0.67 —  80

Noah Dinitz, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 -5
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
Total 6.0 5 3 120 0.29 1.67 35

Ved Patel, WUSTL C

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Purdue A L 210-330 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Purdue D W 300-60 1.0 4 1 20 1.75 4.00 35
3 DePaul A W 290-170 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Purdue B W 400-110 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 Chicago B L 80-460 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Illinois A L 145-370 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 6.0 9 1 120 0.71 9.00 85

Jonah Schwartz, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 2 4 20 0.00 0.50 0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 2 2 20 0.50 1.00 10
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
Total 7.0 9 7 140 0.39 1.29 55

Josh Towns, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 2 1 20 0.75 2.00 15
Total 6.0 2 1 120 0.13 2.00 15

Ryan Xu, WUSTL D

D2
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 0 0 20 0.00 —  0
Total 7.0 4 1 140 0.25 4.00 35

Spencer Lehmann, WUSTL D

UG
Rd. Opponent Result GP 10 -5 TUH PPTUH G/N Pts
1 Illinois B L 145-290 1.0 4 0 20 2.00 —  40
2 Chicago C L 60-350 1.0 2 0 20 1.00 —  20
3 Chicago D L 65-310 1.0 3 1 20 1.25 3.00 25
4 Chicago A L 35-615 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
5 WUSTL A L 10-495 1.0 1 0 20 0.50 —  10
6 WUSTL B L 95-215 1.0 1 1 20 0.25 1.00 5
7 Purdue C L 115-275 1.0 3 2 20 1.00 1.50 20
Total 7.0 15 4 140 0.93 3.75 130

Made with YellowFruit 🍌