2021 William Rufus King Memorial Tournament (WRK) on October 09, 2021 Statistics report for All Rounds
Standings Individuals Scoreboard Team Detail Individual Detail Round Report Stat Key

Individual Detail

     Prelims
     Playoffs

Bryce Borden, Alabama Cyber Tech

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Good Hope W 240-65 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 —  —  65
2 West Point A L 115-295 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 1.50 20
3 Lamar W 235-60 1.0 0 4 3 20 1.25 0.00 1.33 25
4 Hoover B L 120-375 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
5 Vestavia Hills L 105-285 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
6 Lamar W 180-115 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
7 West Point B W 110-60 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
8 St. Bernard Prep W 180-130 1.0 1 5 1 20 3.00 1.00 6.00 60
9 Hoover C L 165-305 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 0.50 1.00 15
10 Good Hope W 200-55 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
Total 10.0 5 30 12 200 1.57 0.42 2.92 315

Camden Johnston, Alabama Cyber Tech

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Good Hope W 240-65 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
2 West Point A L 115-295 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Lamar W 235-60 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 Hoover B L 120-375 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
5 Vestavia Hills L 105-285 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
6 Lamar W 180-115 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
7 West Point B W 110-60 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
8 St. Bernard Prep W 180-130 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
9 Hoover C L 165-305 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Good Hope W 200-55 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
Total 6.5 0 0 0 130 0.00 —  —  0

Elizabeth Orton, Alabama Cyber Tech

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Good Hope W 240-65 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 1.00 3.00 30
2 West Point A L 115-295 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 1.00 3.00 30
3 Lamar W 235-60 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
4 Hoover B L 120-375 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
5 Vestavia Hills L 105-285 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
6 Lamar W 180-115 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
7 West Point B W 110-60 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
8 St. Bernard Prep W 180-130 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
9 Hoover C L 165-305 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
10 Good Hope W 200-55 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
Total 10.0 4 21 3 200 1.27 1.33 8.33 255

Eugene Park, Alabama Cyber Tech

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Good Hope W 240-65 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
2 West Point A L 115-295 0.5 0 0 1 10 -0.50 0.00 0.00 -5
3 Lamar W 235-60 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
4 Hoover B L 120-375 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
5 Vestavia Hills L 105-285 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
6 Lamar W 180-115 0.5 0 2 0 10 2.00 —  —  20
7 West Point B W 110-60 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 1.00 4.00 40
8 St. Bernard Prep W 180-130 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 —  —  10
9 Hoover C L 165-305 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
10 Good Hope W 200-55 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
Total 6.5 1 9 2 130 0.73 0.50 5.00 95

James Norris, Alabama Cyber Tech

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Good Hope W 240-65 0.5 1 0 0 10 1.50 —  —  15
2 West Point A L 115-295 0.5 0 0 2 10 -1.00 0.00 0.00 -10
3 Lamar W 235-60 0.5 0 2 0 10 2.00 —  —  20
4 Hoover B L 120-375 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
5 Vestavia Hills L 105-285 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
6 Lamar W 180-115 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 West Point B W 110-60 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
8 St. Bernard Prep W 180-130 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
9 Hoover C L 165-305 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 —  —  10
10 Good Hope W 200-55 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 —  —  10
Total 7.0 2 9 3 140 0.75 0.67 3.67 105

Kiandra, Bob Jones

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 St. Bernard Prep W 250-90 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
2 Hoover A L 110-475 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Hoover C W 225-125 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 West Point B W 440-20 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 —  —  0
5 Holy Spirit W 260-160 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Vestavia Hills W 335-140 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Hoover A L 65-605 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 West Point A W 280-215 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
9 Hoover B L 215-315 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Holy Spirit W 280-245 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 10.0 0 0 0 201 0.00 —  —  0

Rett Krome, Bob Jones

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 St. Bernard Prep W 250-90 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 1.00 2.00 20
2 Hoover A L 110-475 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
3 Hoover C W 225-125 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
4 West Point B W 440-20 1.0 3 5 1 21 4.29 3.00 8.00 90
5 Holy Spirit W 260-160 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
6 Vestavia Hills W 335-140 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
7 Hoover A L 65-605 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
8 West Point A W 280-215 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
9 Hoover B L 215-315 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
10 Holy Spirit W 280-245 1.0 0 8 0 20 4.00 —  —  80
Total 10.0 7 29 3 201 1.89 2.33 12.00 380

Steven Pan, Bob Jones

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 St. Bernard Prep W 250-90 1.0 4 1 3 20 2.75 1.33 1.67 55
2 Hoover A L 110-475 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
3 Hoover C W 225-125 1.0 3 2 1 20 3.00 3.00 5.00 60
4 West Point B W 440-20 1.0 2 5 0 21 3.81 —  —  80
5 Holy Spirit W 260-160 1.0 1 5 2 20 2.75 0.50 3.00 55
6 Vestavia Hills W 335-140 1.0 2 4 0 20 3.50 —  —  70
7 Hoover A L 65-605 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
8 West Point A W 280-215 1.0 5 2 1 20 4.50 5.00 7.00 90
9 Hoover B L 215-315 1.0 2 3 1 20 2.75 2.00 5.00 55
10 Holy Spirit W 280-245 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
Total 10.0 21 24 9 201 2.54 2.33 5.00 510

Thais, Bob Jones

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 St. Bernard Prep W 250-90 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 3.00 25
2 Hoover A L 110-475 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Hoover C W 225-125 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0.50 0
4 West Point B W 440-20 1.0 0 3 0 21 1.43 —  —  30
5 Holy Spirit W 260-160 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Vestavia Hills W 335-140 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
7 Hoover A L 65-605 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
8 West Point A W 280-215 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
9 Hoover B L 215-315 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
10 Holy Spirit W 280-245 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
Total 10.0 3 14 3 201 0.85 1.00 5.67 170

Ace Taylor, Good Hope

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
4 Lamar L 110-120 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 —  —  0
Total 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 —  —  0

Eli Kicker, Good Hope

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Alabama Cyber Tech L 65-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
2 Hoover B L 10-485 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
3 Vestavia Hills L 45-305 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
4 Lamar L 110-120 1.0 0 1 0 21 0.48 —  —  10
5 West Point A L 5-380 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
6 St. Bernard Prep W 160-130 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 Lamar L 40-155 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
8 Hoover C L 60-270 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
9 West Point B L 95-175 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
10 Alabama Cyber Tech L 55-200 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 10.0 0 8 1 201 0.37 0.00 8.00 75

Logan Self, Good Hope

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Alabama Cyber Tech L 65-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
2 Hoover B L 10-485 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Vestavia Hills L 45-305 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
4 Lamar L 110-120 1.0 0 1 0 21 0.48 —  —  10
5 West Point A L 5-380 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 St. Bernard Prep W 160-130 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Lamar L 40-155 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Hoover C L 60-270 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
9 West Point B L 95-175 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Alabama Cyber Tech L 55-200 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 10.0 0 3 1 201 0.12 0.00 3.00 25

Mary Self, Good Hope

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Alabama Cyber Tech L 65-240 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
2 Hoover B L 10-485 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
3 Vestavia Hills L 45-305 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
5 West Point A L 5-380 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
6 St. Bernard Prep W 160-130 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 Lamar L 40-155 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Hoover C L 60-270 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
9 West Point B L 95-175 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Alabama Cyber Tech L 55-200 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 9.0 0 2 2 180 0.06 0.00 1.00 10

Tripp Taylor, Good Hope

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Alabama Cyber Tech L 65-240 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 1.00 4.00 40
2 Hoover B L 10-485 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
3 Vestavia Hills L 45-305 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 Lamar L 110-120 1.0 0 5 2 21 1.90 0.00 2.50 40
5 West Point A L 5-380 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 St. Bernard Prep W 160-130 1.0 0 6 0 20 3.00 —  —  60
7 Lamar L 40-155 1.0 0 2 4 20 0.00 0.00 0.50 0
8 Hoover C L 60-270 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
9 West Point B L 95-175 1.0 0 5 3 20 1.75 0.00 1.67 35
10 Alabama Cyber Tech L 55-200 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
Total 10.0 1 27 12 201 1.12 0.08 2.33 225

Alex Halbesleben, Holy Spirit

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover A L 130-530 1.0 4 0 0 20 3.00 —  —  60
2 Hoover C W 230-160 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
3 West Point B W 315-95 1.0 1 9 0 20 5.25 —  —  105
4 St. Bernard Prep W 325-60 1.0 2 4 0 20 3.50 —  —  70
5 Bob Jones L 160-260 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 0.00 6.00 55
6 Hoover A L 165-495 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
7 West Point A L 195-250 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 —  —  55
8 Hoover B L 240-305 1.0 2 4 0 20 3.50 —  —  70
9 Vestavia Hills W 405-75 1.0 2 5 0 20 4.00 —  —  80
10 Bob Jones L 245-280 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
Total 10.0 14 41 1 200 3.08 14.00 55.00 615

Austin Johnson, Holy Spirit

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover A L 130-530 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
2 Hoover C W 230-160 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 5.00 45
3 West Point B W 315-95 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
4 St. Bernard Prep W 325-60 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 5.00 45
5 Bob Jones L 160-260 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0.50 0
6 Hoover A L 165-495 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
7 West Point A L 195-250 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
8 Hoover B L 240-305 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
9 Vestavia Hills W 405-75 1.0 0 7 0 20 3.50 —  —  70
10 Bob Jones L 245-280 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
Total 10.0 0 25 6 200 1.10 0.00 4.17 220

Charles Abney, Holy Spirit

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover A L 130-530 0.5 0 0 1 10 -0.50 0.00 0.00 -5
3 West Point B W 315-95 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
5 Bob Jones L 160-260 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Hoover B L 240-305 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 1.00 2.00 20
9 Vestavia Hills W 405-75 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
Total 4.0 1 3 3 80 0.38 0.33 1.33 30

Donald Abney, Holy Spirit

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
3 West Point B W 315-95 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 St. Bernard Prep W 325-60 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 West Point A L 195-250 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
10 Bob Jones L 245-280 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
Total 3.5 1 2 0 70 0.50 —  —  35

Hayden Pilkinton, Holy Spirit

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover A L 130-530 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
2 Hoover C W 230-160 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
4 St. Bernard Prep W 325-60 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 1.00 1.00 10
5 Bob Jones L 160-260 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
6 Hoover A L 165-495 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 West Point A L 195-250 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Hoover B L 240-305 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
9 Vestavia Hills W 405-75 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
10 Bob Jones L 245-280 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
Total 9.0 3 3 4 180 0.31 0.75 1.50 55

Jaydn Fording, Holy Spirit

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover A L 130-530 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
2 Hoover C W 230-160 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
6 Hoover A L 165-495 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 West Point A L 195-250 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
9 Vestavia Hills W 405-75 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
Total 3.5 0 1 1 70 0.07 0.00 1.00 5

Chris Cheng, Hoover A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Holy Spirit W 530-130 1.0 3 0 2 20 1.75 1.50 1.50 35
2 Bob Jones W 475-110 1.0 1 2 2 20 1.25 0.50 1.50 25
3 St. Bernard Prep W 510-55 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 0.50 1.00 15
4 Hoover C W 620-10 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
5 West Point B W 545-10 1.0 3 0 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
6 Holy Spirit W 495-165 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
7 Bob Jones W 605-65 1.0 3 1 0 20 2.75 —  —  55
8 Vestavia Hills W 500-110 1.0 2 0 1 20 1.25 2.00 2.00 25
9 West Point A W 390-140 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 0.50 1.00 15
10 Hoover B W 450-130 1.0 3 2 0 20 3.25 —  —  65
Total 10.0 20 10 9 200 1.77 2.22 3.33 355

Kapil Nathan, Hoover A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Holy Spirit W 530-130 1.0 3 5 1 20 4.50 3.00 8.00 90
2 Bob Jones W 475-110 1.0 4 2 3 20 3.25 1.33 2.00 65
3 St. Bernard Prep W 510-55 1.0 4 6 2 20 5.50 2.00 5.00 110
4 Hoover C W 620-10 1.0 8 4 0 20 8.00 —  —  160
5 West Point B W 545-10 1.0 5 4 3 20 5.00 1.67 3.00 100
6 Holy Spirit W 495-165 1.0 3 5 3 20 4.00 1.00 2.67 80
7 Bob Jones W 605-65 1.0 7 1 2 20 5.25 3.50 4.00 105
8 Vestavia Hills W 500-110 1.0 6 4 1 20 6.25 6.00 10.00 125
9 West Point A W 390-140 1.0 8 3 3 20 6.75 2.67 3.67 135
10 Hoover B W 450-130 1.0 4 0 2 20 2.50 2.00 2.00 50
Total 10.0 52 34 20 200 5.10 2.60 4.30 1020

Sarah Xin, Hoover A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Holy Spirit W 530-130 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
2 Bob Jones W 475-110 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
3 St. Bernard Prep W 510-55 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
4 Hoover C W 620-10 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
5 West Point B W 545-10 1.0 2 2 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
6 Holy Spirit W 495-165 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
7 Bob Jones W 605-65 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 —  —  55
8 Vestavia Hills W 500-110 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
9 West Point A W 390-140 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Hoover B W 450-130 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 —  —  55
Total 10.0 12 21 0 200 1.95 —  —  390

Aiden Dombrosky, Hoover B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Vestavia Hills W 240-200 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
2 Good Hope W 485-10 1.0 3 4 1 20 4.00 3.00 7.00 80
3 West Point A L 190-195 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
4 Alabama Cyber Tech W 375-120 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 1.00 4.00 40
5 Lamar W 330-70 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 0.50 1.00 15
6 West Point A W 300-195 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 3.00 25
7 Vestavia Hills W 435-50 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
8 Holy Spirit W 305-240 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
9 Bob Jones W 315-215 1.0 4 1 3 20 2.75 1.33 1.67 55
10 Hoover A L 130-450 1.0 1 0 2 20 0.25 0.50 0.50 5
Total 10.0 13 17 11 200 1.55 1.18 2.73 310

Jari Chen, Hoover B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Vestavia Hills W 240-200 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
2 Good Hope W 485-10 0.5 0 2 0 10 2.00 —  —  20
4 Alabama Cyber Tech W 375-120 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 —  —  10
7 Vestavia Hills W 435-50 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 —  —  10
9 Bob Jones W 315-215 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 3.0 0 4 0 60 0.67 —  —  40

Kevin Kong, Hoover B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Vestavia Hills W 240-200 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
2 Good Hope W 485-10 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
3 West Point A L 190-195 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 Alabama Cyber Tech W 375-120 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
5 Lamar W 330-70 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
6 West Point A W 300-195 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
7 Vestavia Hills W 435-50 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
8 Holy Spirit W 305-240 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
9 Bob Jones W 315-215 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
10 Hoover A L 130-450 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
Total 10.0 2 14 3 200 0.78 0.67 5.33 155

Krish Nathan, Hoover B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Vestavia Hills W 240-200 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
2 Good Hope W 485-10 0.5 2 1 1 10 3.50 2.00 3.00 35
3 West Point A L 190-195 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 1.50 20
4 Alabama Cyber Tech W 375-120 0.5 0 2 0 10 2.00 —  —  20
5 Lamar W 330-70 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
6 West Point A W 300-195 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
7 Vestavia Hills W 435-50 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 —  —  10
8 Holy Spirit W 305-240 1.0 3 0 1 20 2.00 3.00 3.00 40
10 Hoover A L 130-450 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 1.00 3.00 30
Total 7.5 7 17 5 150 1.67 1.40 4.80 250

Midhun Sadanand, Hoover B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Vestavia Hills W 240-200 0.5 4 3 3 10 7.50 1.33 2.33 75
2 Good Hope W 485-10 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 1.00 4.00 40
3 West Point A L 190-195 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 0.50 1.00 15
4 Alabama Cyber Tech W 375-120 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 1.00 4.00 40
5 Lamar W 330-70 1.0 1 3 3 20 1.50 0.33 1.33 30
6 West Point A W 300-195 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 3.00 25
7 Vestavia Hills W 435-50 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 —  —  65
8 Holy Spirit W 305-240 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
9 Bob Jones W 315-215 1.0 2 2 1 20 2.25 2.00 4.00 45
10 Hoover A L 130-450 1.0 1 0 1 20 0.50 1.00 1.00 10
Total 9.5 12 27 14 190 2.00 0.86 2.79 380

Alex Hamley, Hoover C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point B W 195-110 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 3.00 25
2 Holy Spirit L 160-230 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
3 Bob Jones L 125-225 0.8 0 2 1 15 1.00 0.00 2.00 15
4 Hoover A L 10-620 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
5 St. Bernard Prep W 145-45 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
6 West Point B W 230-110 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
8 Good Hope W 270-60 0.2 0 0 0 4 0.00 —  —  0
Total 6.0 0 8 5 119 0.46 0.00 1.60 55

Keith Delarosa, Hoover C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
2 Holy Spirit L 160-230 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
3 Bob Jones L 125-225 0.3 0 0 1 5 -1.00 0.00 0.00 -5
5 St. Bernard Prep W 145-45 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 St. Bernard Prep L 160-175 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0.50 0
8 Good Hope W 270-60 0.8 0 2 1 16 0.94 0.00 2.00 15
10 Lamar W 150-115 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 0.00 1.00 10
Total 5.0 0 7 7 101 0.35 0.00 1.00 35

Liz Wang, Hoover C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
3 Bob Jones L 125-225 0.8 0 2 0 15 1.33 —  —  20
7 St. Bernard Prep L 160-175 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
9 Alabama Cyber Tech W 305-165 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
Total 2.8 0 6 0 55 1.09 —  —  60

Miley Henton, Hoover C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point B W 195-110 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
2 Holy Spirit L 160-230 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
3 Bob Jones L 125-225 0.3 0 0 0 5 0.00 —  —  0
4 Hoover A L 10-620 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 West Point B W 230-110 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
7 St. Bernard Prep L 160-175 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
8 Good Hope W 270-60 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
9 Alabama Cyber Tech W 305-165 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
10 Lamar W 150-115 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
Total 8.3 1 16 0 165 1.06 —  —  175

Natalie Metcalf, Hoover C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point B W 195-110 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Bob Jones L 125-225 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
4 Hoover A L 10-620 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
5 St. Bernard Prep W 145-45 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
6 West Point B W 230-110 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
8 Good Hope W 270-60 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
9 Alabama Cyber Tech W 305-165 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
10 Lamar W 150-115 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
Total 8.0 0 12 3 160 0.66 0.00 4.00 105

Sam Bachrach, Hoover C

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point B W 195-110 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
2 Holy Spirit L 160-230 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 1.50 20
3 Bob Jones L 125-225 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
4 Hoover A L 10-620 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
5 St. Bernard Prep W 145-45 1.0 1 3 3 20 1.50 0.33 1.33 30
6 West Point B W 230-110 1.0 1 5 0 20 3.25 —  —  65
7 St. Bernard Prep L 160-175 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
8 Good Hope W 270-60 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
9 Alabama Cyber Tech W 305-165 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 1.00 2.00 20
10 Lamar W 150-115 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
Total 10.0 5 27 7 200 1.55 0.71 4.57 310

Anika Ravi, Lamar

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
2 Vestavia Hills W 205-190 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
5 Hoover B L 70-330 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Alabama Cyber Tech L 115-180 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 West Point B L 175-200 0.5 0 1 0 10 1.00 —  —  10
9 St. Bernard Prep L 45-195 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
10 Hoover C L 115-150 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
Total 5.0 0 5 0 100 0.50 —  —  50

Austin Dungan, Lamar

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point A L 155-245 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
3 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-235 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
4 Good Hope W 120-110 1.0 0 1 2 21 0.00 0.00 0.50 0
7 Good Hope W 155-40 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
8 West Point B L 175-200 0.5 0 0 0 10 0.00 —  —  0
9 St. Bernard Prep L 45-195 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Hoover C L 115-150 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
Total 6.5 0 7 3 131 0.42 0.00 2.33 55

Brady Lagendyk, Lamar

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point A L 155-245 1.0 1 1 2 20 0.75 0.50 1.00 15
2 Vestavia Hills W 205-190 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
4 Good Hope W 120-110 1.0 1 2 0 21 1.67 —  —  35
5 Hoover B L 70-330 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 Good Hope W 155-40 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
8 West Point B L 175-200 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
9 St. Bernard Prep L 45-195 0.5 0 2 0 10 2.00 —  —  20
10 Hoover C L 115-150 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
Total 7.5 5 14 2 151 1.36 2.50 9.50 205

Maggie Triplett, Lamar

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point A L 155-245 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
2 Vestavia Hills W 205-190 1.0 0 6 1 20 2.75 0.00 6.00 55
3 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-235 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
4 Good Hope W 120-110 1.0 1 2 2 21 1.19 0.50 1.50 25
5 Hoover B L 70-330 1.0 0 2 2 20 0.50 0.00 1.00 10
6 Alabama Cyber Tech L 115-180 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 5.00 45
7 Good Hope W 155-40 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
8 West Point B L 175-200 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
9 St. Bernard Prep L 45-195 1.0 0 1 4 20 -0.50 0.00 0.25 -10
Total 9.0 2 25 12 181 1.22 0.17 2.25 220

Spence Hanegan, Lamar

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 West Point A L 155-245 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
3 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-235 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
4 Good Hope W 120-110 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 —  —  0
6 Alabama Cyber Tech L 115-180 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 Good Hope W 155-40 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 West Point B L 175-200 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
9 St. Bernard Prep L 45-195 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
10 Hoover C L 115-150 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 8.0 0 4 2 161 0.19 0.00 2.00 30

Thad Ransier, Lamar

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
2 Vestavia Hills W 205-190 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
3 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-235 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
5 Hoover B L 70-330 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
6 Alabama Cyber Tech L 115-180 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
Total 4.0 0 4 1 80 0.44 0.00 4.00 35

Thomas Yohe, St. Bernard Prep

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Bob Jones L 90-250 1.0 1 3 1 20 2.00 1.00 4.00 40
2 West Point B W 155-80 1.0 0 9 1 20 4.25 0.00 9.00 85
3 Hoover A L 55-510 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
4 Holy Spirit L 60-325 1.0 0 4 4 20 1.00 0.00 1.00 20
5 Hoover C L 45-145 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 3.00 25
6 Good Hope L 130-160 1.0 0 7 2 20 3.00 0.00 3.50 60
7 Hoover C W 175-160 1.0 2 6 1 20 4.25 2.00 8.00 85
8 Alabama Cyber Tech L 130-180 1.0 0 7 2 20 3.00 0.00 3.50 60
9 Lamar W 195-45 1.0 0 11 1 20 5.25 0.00 11.00 105
10 West Point B W 105-90 1.0 0 7 1 20 3.25 0.00 7.00 65
Total 10.0 3 61 15 200 2.90 0.20 4.27 580

Willa Smith, St. Bernard Prep

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Bob Jones L 90-250 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
2 West Point B W 155-80 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Hoover A L 55-510 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 Holy Spirit L 60-325 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
5 Hoover C L 45-145 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Good Hope L 130-160 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Hoover C W 175-160 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Alabama Cyber Tech L 130-180 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
9 Lamar W 195-45 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 West Point B W 105-90 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 10.0 0 1 0 200 0.05 —  —  10

Ali Fathallah-Shaykh, Vestavia Hills

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover B L 200-240 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
2 Lamar L 190-205 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Good Hope W 305-45 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 West Point A L 95-280 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
5 Alabama Cyber Tech W 285-105 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Bob Jones L 140-335 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Hoover B L 50-435 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Hoover A L 110-500 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
9 Holy Spirit L 75-405 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 West Point A L 125-310 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
Total 10.0 0 0 2 200 -0.05 0.00 0.00 -10

Arav Singh, Vestavia Hills

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover B L 200-240 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
2 Lamar L 190-205 1.0 1 3 0 20 2.25 —  —  45
3 Good Hope W 305-45 1.0 1 6 1 20 3.50 1.00 7.00 70
4 West Point A L 95-280 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
5 Alabama Cyber Tech W 285-105 1.0 1 7 1 20 4.00 1.00 8.00 80
6 Bob Jones L 140-335 1.0 1 1 0 20 1.25 —  —  25
7 Hoover B L 50-435 1.0 1 1 1 20 1.00 1.00 2.00 20
8 Hoover A L 110-500 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
9 Holy Spirit L 75-405 1.0 2 1 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
10 West Point A L 125-310 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
Total 10.0 7 28 4 200 1.82 1.75 8.75 365

Ian Cheng, Vestavia Hills

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover B L 200-240 1.0 2 1 1 20 1.75 2.00 3.00 35
2 Lamar L 190-205 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 3.00 25
3 Good Hope W 305-45 1.0 2 3 1 20 2.75 2.00 5.00 55
4 West Point A L 95-280 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
5 Alabama Cyber Tech W 285-105 1.0 0 3 1 20 1.25 0.00 3.00 25
6 Bob Jones L 140-335 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
7 Hoover B L 50-435 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Hoover A L 110-500 1.0 2 0 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
9 Holy Spirit L 75-405 1.0 2 0 1 20 1.25 2.00 2.00 25
10 West Point A L 125-310 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
Total 10.0 9 19 5 200 1.50 1.80 5.60 300

Ishaan Singh, Vestavia Hills

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover B L 200-240 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
2 Lamar L 190-205 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
3 Good Hope W 305-45 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
4 West Point A L 95-280 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
5 Alabama Cyber Tech W 285-105 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
6 Bob Jones L 140-335 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Hoover B L 50-435 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
8 Hoover A L 110-500 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
9 Holy Spirit L 75-405 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 West Point A L 125-310 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
Total 10.0 0 5 0 200 0.25 —  —  50

Abigail Roy, West Point A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Lamar W 245-155 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
2 Alabama Cyber Tech W 295-115 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
3 Hoover B W 195-190 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
4 Vestavia Hills W 280-95 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
5 Good Hope W 380-5 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
6 Hoover B L 195-300 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Holy Spirit W 250-195 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Bob Jones L 215-280 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
9 Hoover A L 140-390 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Vestavia Hills W 310-125 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 10.0 1 3 2 200 0.17 0.50 2.00 35

Brodie Henry, West Point A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Lamar W 245-155 1.0 1 4 3 20 2.00 0.33 1.67 40
2 Alabama Cyber Tech W 295-115 1.0 2 6 0 20 4.50 —  —  90
3 Hoover B W 195-190 1.0 2 5 0 20 4.00 —  —  80
4 Vestavia Hills W 280-95 1.0 2 4 1 20 3.25 2.00 6.00 65
5 Good Hope W 380-5 1.0 3 4 0 20 4.25 —  —  85
6 Hoover B L 195-300 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
7 Holy Spirit W 250-195 1.0 2 6 1 20 4.25 2.00 8.00 85
8 Bob Jones L 215-280 1.0 2 2 2 20 2.00 1.00 2.00 40
9 Hoover A L 140-390 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
10 Vestavia Hills W 310-125 1.0 1 4 0 20 2.75 —  —  55
Total 10.0 15 44 7 200 3.15 2.14 8.43 630

Carter Duke, West Point A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Lamar W 245-155 1.0 0 2 3 20 0.25 0.00 0.67 5
2 Alabama Cyber Tech W 295-115 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
3 Hoover B W 195-190 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
4 Vestavia Hills W 280-95 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
5 Good Hope W 380-5 1.0 0 1 2 20 0.00 0.00 0.50 0
6 Hoover B L 195-300 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
7 Holy Spirit W 250-195 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
8 Bob Jones L 215-280 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
9 Hoover A L 140-390 1.0 0 3 2 20 1.00 0.00 1.50 20
10 Vestavia Hills W 310-125 1.0 3 1 1 20 2.50 3.00 4.00 50
Total 10.0 3 19 11 200 0.90 0.27 2.00 180

Judd Douglas, West Point A

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Lamar W 245-155 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
2 Alabama Cyber Tech W 295-115 1.0 0 0 2 20 -0.50 0.00 0.00 -10
3 Hoover B W 195-190 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 Vestavia Hills W 280-95 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
5 Good Hope W 380-5 1.0 0 5 0 20 2.50 —  —  50
6 Hoover B L 195-300 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
7 Holy Spirit W 250-195 1.0 0 2 1 20 0.75 0.00 2.00 15
8 Bob Jones L 215-280 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
9 Hoover A L 140-390 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 Vestavia Hills W 310-125 1.0 0 4 1 20 1.75 0.00 4.00 35
Total 10.0 0 16 4 200 0.70 0.00 4.00 140

Aaiden Jones, West Point B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover C L 110-195 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
2 St. Bernard Prep L 80-155 1.0 1 0 0 20 0.75 —  —  15
3 Holy Spirit L 95-315 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
4 Bob Jones L 20-440 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 —  —  0
5 Hoover A L 10-545 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Hoover C L 110-230 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-110 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
8 Lamar W 200-175 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
9 Good Hope W 175-95 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 St. Bernard Prep L 90-105 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
Total 10.0 1 4 1 201 0.25 1.00 5.00 50

Eli Taylor, West Point B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover C L 110-195 1.0 0 1 1 20 0.25 0.00 1.00 5
2 St. Bernard Prep L 80-155 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
3 Holy Spirit L 95-315 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
4 Bob Jones L 20-440 1.0 0 1 0 21 0.48 —  —  10
5 Hoover A L 10-545 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Hoover C L 110-230 1.0 0 4 0 20 2.00 —  —  40
7 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-110 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
8 Lamar W 200-175 1.0 2 0 1 20 1.25 2.00 2.00 25
9 Good Hope W 175-95 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
10 St. Bernard Prep L 90-105 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
Total 10.0 2 16 2 201 0.90 1.00 9.00 180

John Davis Yovino, West Point B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover C L 110-195 1.0 0 5 1 20 2.25 0.00 5.00 45
2 St. Bernard Prep L 80-155 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
3 Holy Spirit L 95-315 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 Bob Jones L 20-440 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 —  —  0
5 Hoover A L 10-545 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
6 Hoover C L 110-230 1.0 0 2 0 20 1.00 —  —  20
7 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-110 1.0 0 3 0 20 1.50 —  —  30
8 Lamar W 200-175 1.0 1 2 0 20 1.75 —  —  35
9 Good Hope W 175-95 1.0 0 8 1 20 3.75 0.00 8.00 75
10 St. Bernard Prep L 90-105 1.0 1 2 1 20 1.50 1.00 3.00 30
Total 10.0 2 25 3 201 1.32 0.67 9.00 265

Nora Dotson, West Point B

Rd. Opponent Result GP 15 10 -5 TUH PPTUH Pwr/N G/N Pts
1 Hoover C L 110-195 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
2 St. Bernard Prep L 80-155 1.0 0 0 1 20 -0.25 0.00 0.00 -5
3 Holy Spirit L 95-315 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
4 Bob Jones L 20-440 1.0 0 0 0 21 0.00 —  —  0
5 Hoover A L 10-545 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
6 Hoover C L 110-230 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
7 Alabama Cyber Tech L 60-110 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
8 Lamar W 200-175 1.0 0 1 0 20 0.50 —  —  10
9 Good Hope W 175-95 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
10 St. Bernard Prep L 90-105 1.0 0 0 0 20 0.00 —  —  0
Total 10.0 0 1 1 201 0.02 0.00 1.00 5

Made with YellowFruit 🍌