Page 1 of 2

Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:48 am
by Ndg
I suppose I may as well make a proper thread for this now that various versions have been floating around for close to a year.

What is it?
A standalone Windows application for (manual) stat entry. Think of it as SQBS but with
- Less crummy UI
- Support for phases/stages (don't need multiple files for one tournament)
- Better looking, easier-to-navigate, customizable html reports. Here is a sample stat report.

Download the latest version here. A macOS version is also available, but I make no guarantees about whether it will work on any particular device.
(v2.5.4, 28 June 2020)


I won't clutter this post with screenshots but you can see some (slightly out of date) ones here

What isn't it?
"Live" stats entry. There are other tools you can use for that if that's what you want.

Is constructive criticism welcome?
Yes.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:08 am
by the return of AHAN
I'm interested in a Mac version since all of our devices in my school are Apple products.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:41 pm
by Atlashill
I'm in the process of giving it a run-through with scoresheets I've retained from a 36-team tournament. So far I'm enjoying the option to name pools and phases all at once, as well as the sidebar where standings are updating as I enter games. However, it's a bit of a hassle to click "add game", then "new game" over and over. It would be nice if there was a third button where once you added a game, it automatically begins creation of another entry. This would help streamline data entry when having to deal with multiple scoresheets on short time.

I'm making additional notes on some of the benefits and drawbacks compared to SQBS, I am curious as to what tweaks or features you're thinking of including in the near future.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:59 pm
by Ndg
Atlashill wrote:
Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:41 pm
it's a bit of a hassle to click "add game", then "new game" over and over. It would be nice if there was a third button where once you added a game, it automatically begins creation of another entry.

Good idea. It shouldn't be difficult for me to add an "accept and new" button. In the meantime (I don't know whether you mean "click" literally) you can mitigate this by using the keyboard shortcuts, alt-A and ctrl-G.
Atlashill wrote:
Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:41 pm
I am curious as to what tweaks or features you're thinking of including in the near future.
I have nothing major in mind. What exists now is more or less my vision for what it ought to be. The next version will have auto-save ability and probably improvements to the division editing UI, which right now can be problematic if you need to go back and change things after you've started adding games.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 11:16 pm
by jonah
Looks like in the SQBS converter, for forfeits you output a blank line for tossups heard. SQBS would output a 0.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:51 pm
by Atlashill
Adding UG & D2 was an excellent idea. Is it possible to add an option, for high school tournaments, where UG and D2 become Small School (SS) and JV? We have a handful of tournaments that offer either if not both awards, and this would be an easy way to keep track. (For the tournament I'm slowly rebuilding as a test-run for YF, I had 11 small schools out of 36 teams, which I've indicated as D2.)

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 7:59 pm
by Ndg
Atlashill wrote:
Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:41 pm
It would be nice if there was a third button where once you added a game, it automatically begins creation of another entry. This would help streamline data entry when having to deal with multiple scoresheets on short time.
jonah wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2019 11:16 pm
Looks like in the SQBS converter, for forfeits you output a blank line for tossups heard. SQBS would output a 0.
Atlashill wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:51 pm
Adding UG & D2 was an excellent idea. Is it possible to add an option, for high school tournaments, where UG and D2 become Small School (SS) and JV? We have a handful of tournaments that offer either if not both awards, and this would be an easy way to keep track. (For the tournament I'm slowly rebuilding as a test-run for YF, I had 11 small schools out of 36 teams, which I've indicated as D2.)
I've addressed these in the newest version (linked above).

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:42 pm
by Atlashill
There's a bug with the new version (2.3.2): when I attempt to save phases, the screen goes blank, and it's not possible to save the file from that point.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 10:52 pm
by Ndg
Atlashill wrote:
Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:42 pm
There's a bug with the new version (2.3.2): when I attempt to save phases, the screen goes blank, and it's not possible to save the file from that point.
Fixed

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:04 pm
by Ndg
the return of AHAN wrote:
Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:08 am
I'm interested in a Mac version since all of our devices in my school are Apple products.
I've linked a MacOS version in the original post.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2019 9:00 pm
by Ndg
I think this has been done in some form before, but if anyone needs an easy way to move stat reports from Neg5 to the hsquizbowl database, I've added an "Import QBJ" option.

There are a few caveats with this:
- This is only for the specific schema version 2.1 file that Neg5 exports
- Neg5 doesn't seem to export phases or divisions/pools, so you would have to reconstruct those manually
- The newest version supports tiebreakers, but Neg5 doesn't, so any time a team plays multiple games in one round, those games are assumed to be tiebreakers
- Files with data that you wouldn't be allowed to enter manually in YF will be rejected (for example, Neg5 fails to verify that total TU heard for a team is not greater than the game's TU read times the max players per team)

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:46 am
by jij03
I think i can speak for the entire Missouri Circuit at this point

This Application has been quite useful to the circuit this season, our stats recording and uploading processes have been overall more efficient and quick. I enjoyed using it for FORKAST and Three Trails. Though there are a couple of hiccups here and there, which have already been specified, Using Yellow fruit has been more intuitive than SQBS overall.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:20 pm
by mithokie
For the VHSL Scholastic Bowl format, we have 30 toss-up questions per match with no powers and no bonuses. There is also a directed round of 10 questions to each time that can be bounced back and stolen.

In SQBS, I used the Lightning Round option to track the directed round points for each team. Does anyone have a good suggestion for how to use Yellow Fruit to record VHSL matches?

Thanks.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:12 am
by Joshua Rutsky
Seconded. I understand that both this and Neg5 were written with the common 20/20 format in mind, but it would be a HUGE difference-maker for many of us in states where worksheet rounds or lightning rounds still exist to add this functionality to the programs. Something as basic as one extra field per team to record those points and carry them into the results would make it possible for us to use these programs regularly. Please consider this addition.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 7:51 pm
by Ndg
Joshua Rutsky wrote:
Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:12 am
Seconded. I understand that both this and Neg5 were written with the common 20/20 format in mind, but it would be a HUGE difference-maker for many of us in states where worksheet rounds or lightning rounds still exist to add this functionality to the programs. Something as basic as one extra field per team to record those points and carry them into the results would make it possible for us to use these programs regularly. Please consider this addition.
This is certainly something I can do if I see sufficient demand for it. I have no experience whatsoever with (non-NHBB) quiz bowl involving this sort of thing, so I would encourage anyone who uses lightning rounds to either DM me or post here with details of how your particular format works so I can design a solution that works for as many people as possible. For example,
mithokie wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:20 pm
For the VHSL Scholastic Bowl format [...] There is also a directed round of 10 questions to each time that can be bounced back and stolen.
How many points is each part worth in this format? Is there a bonus for sweeping the round as in NHBB?

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 8:01 pm
by Cody
For VHSL, all you need is a lightning round box score for both teams (same as any other lightning round format even though VHSL functions differently). SQBS handles it well by leaving it open imo.

As for details, each team can score some integer multiple of ten points, no more than 200 combined, no sweep bonus.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 11:19 pm
by Joshua Rutsky
Alabama’s Elementary and Middle School format is 20/20 with a 100 point worksheet round at the halfway point. Both teams participate, and there is no bounceback, so all that would be needed is a field for entering a score for each team on that segment, and an option to enable it.

Your considering this is much appreciated. I have used SQBS for a long time, and it is still a good option, but it has needed a real overhaul for quite some time.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:23 pm
by Lighthouse Expert Elinor DeWire
As SCT approaches and NAQT requires hosts to report in SQBS, are there any known bugs that need to be addressed, or the SQBS export as is good enough for NAQT standards?

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:31 pm
by Important Bird Area
For the record: we do still require SQBS for SCT results reporting. We are planning to reconsider this policy for 2021 if YellowFruit continues to be stable and error-free in the meantime.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:19 am
by Atlashill
If we're throwing in state-specific quirks, I might as well put Missouri's forward since (as Aidan has mentioned above and also successfully advocated) several hosts here have switched to YellowFruit.

Our overtime scoring is slightly different, in that 1) any tossups scored are one point instead of 10 and 2) they aren't suppose to count toward a team's score for playoff advancement or an individual's stats. In SQBS, the ability to specify point values for tossups made indicating these tossups possible. Perhaps if a fourth column of tossups is added, this could be a customizable score column where either our OT tossups, superpowers, or other quirks can be properly scored. (Though, in the case of playoff advancement, there might have to be a little more done to get that in.)

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:45 am
by Ndg
Atlashill wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:19 am
If we're throwing in state-specific quirks, I might as well put Missouri's forward since (as Aidan has mentioned above and also successfully advocated) several hosts here have switched to YellowFruit.

Our overtime scoring is slightly different, in that 1) any tossups scored are one point instead of 10 and 2) they aren't suppose to count toward a team's score for playoff advancement or an individual's stats. In SQBS, the ability to specify point values for tossups made indicating these tossups possible. Perhaps if a fourth column of tossups is added, this could be a customizable score column where either our OT tossups, superpowers, or other quirks can be properly scored. (Though, in the case of playoff advancement, there might have to be a little more done to get that in.)
This sounds the same as NHBB rules, where the game effectively ends in a tie score, but one team is declared the winner. I'm assuming this is sudden-death, and there are no negs in overtime?

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:51 pm
by sgoebel
Ignore this - sorry.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 3:03 pm
by Important Bird Area
Just to make my previous post clear: SCT has strict reporting requirements that do not apply to regular-season high school and middle school events.

If you are keeping statistics for this year's SCT, please use SQBS, not any other program.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 3:49 pm
by Atlashill
Ndg wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:45 am
Atlashill wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:19 am
If we're throwing in state-specific quirks, I might as well put Missouri's forward since (as Aidan has mentioned above and also successfully advocated) several hosts here have switched to YellowFruit.

Our overtime scoring is slightly different, in that 1) any tossups scored are one point instead of 10 and 2) they aren't suppose to count toward a team's score for playoff advancement or an individual's stats. In SQBS, the ability to specify point values for tossups made indicating these tossups possible. Perhaps if a fourth column of tossups is added, this could be a customizable score column where either our OT tossups, superpowers, or other quirks can be properly scored. (Though, in the case of playoff advancement, there might have to be a little more done to get that in.)
This sounds the same as NHBB rules, where the game effectively ends in a tie score, but one team is declared the winner. I'm assuming this is sudden-death, and there are no negs in overtime?
Correct, sudden-death/golden tossup. Thankfully, the state changed their procedure to first-to-one; it used to be first-to-three.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:46 pm
by Snoopy
Do you think you can add an import from SQBS feature in a future release for easy conversion? Not a programmer, so sorry if I just made an insanely hard suggestion.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:51 pm
by Ndg
Snoopy wrote:
Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:46 pm
Do you think you can add an import from SQBS feature in a future release for easy conversion? Not a programmer, so sorry if I just made an insanely hard suggestion.
What is the use case for doing this? It's not necessarily that hard, but I haven't come with a reason to justify the work.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:31 pm
by Snoopy
Ndg wrote:
Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:51 pm
What is the use case for doing this? It's not necessarily that hard, but I haven't come with a reason to justify the work.
I suppose to standardize report formats in the future if/when Yellowfruit becomes the new standard.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2020 1:33 pm
by Ndg
I don't think there's any point in having everyone dig out years of old SQBS files, if they even exist, and re-post the stats, if that's what you mean.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 4:05 pm
by MSchnippert
Thanks for your work on this. I've been playing with it in anticipation of my tournament next weekend. I was able to use the error reporting function in the import QBJ to troubleshoot my Neg5 database that NAQT couldn't import last year. (Not expecting them to, but I was able to send them some VERY delayed individual stats they can add if they want to.)

I'm debating paper scoring with this for my tournament or using Neg5 again and this to help fix data entry errors. Troubleshooting wasn't hard, but would've been even easier with everything fresh on my mind. I just wish one was solidly easier than the other.

I did have one import issue - on the attached file (ending changed from qbj to jpg to be able to attach it), it said round 4 was invalid for Maclay MS-Bainbridge MS which was 145-0. When I added something to both teams to make it 150-5, everything worked fine. I'm really not concerned with it, but I figured I'd send it to you if it could help you find an issue.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 7:37 pm
by Ndg
MSchnippert wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 4:05 pm
I did have one import issue - on the attached file (ending changed from qbj to jpg to be able to attach it), it said round 4 was invalid for Maclay MS-Bainbridge MS which was 145-0. When I added something to both teams to make it 150-5, everything worked fine. I'm really not concerned with it, but I figured I'd send it to you if it could help you find an issue.
Thank you for pointing that out. It turns out it's treating a score of zero as not having a score. Sorry.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 11:05 pm
by Ndg
I've published a new version up above, with the following notable changes:
  1. You can now manually override final rankings (shown when reporting All Games)
  2. Use of "phase"/"stage" record to compute final rankings is now on by default. If this produces undesirable results, see #1 (or turn it off via the report settings).
  3. You can now export results in tournament schema (qbj) version 2.0 format. The main motivation for this is to be able to send more detailed results to NAQT than is possible with the SQBS format. However, there will undoubtedly be some kinks to work out, so I would advise sending NAQT both qbj and sqbs files for the time being.
  4. Basic lightning round support
Also, there's a website

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:22 pm
by Atlashill
I just had a tournament host who used YF 2.5.1 come across an issue when uploading files to the database this weekend. Apparently the _games.html file was rejected because "it does not appear to be a valid SQBS file".

(addendum) Found the culprit. 2.5.1 introduced a cumulative tossup score at the bottom of each game (awesome idea). Unfortunately, there is an HTML command in the code that the database might be rejecting:

Code: Select all

<td align=left><b>Total</b></td>
<td/>
<td align=right><b>2</b></td>
<td align=right><b>10</b></td>
<td align=right><b>130</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=left><b>Total</b></td>
<td/>
<td align=right><b>0</b></td>
<td align=right><b>3</b></td>
<td align=right><b>30</b></td>
(another addendum) Jeffrey has informed me that the issue has been fixed on HSQB's end. I was able to upload a _games.html file created in YF2.5.1 without issue.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:06 pm
by ScoBo
Atlashill wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 12:22 pm
(addendum) Found the culprit. 2.5.1 introduced a cumulative tossup score at the bottom of each game (awesome idea). Unfortunately, there is an HTML command in the code that the database might be rejecting:

Code: Select all

...
<td/>
...
Fixed the database to accept this. Sorry for the inconvenience. Anyone who uploaded stats this weekend might want to check if their games reports are missing and re-upload if it is.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:53 pm
by the return of AHAN
Ndg wrote:
Sun Feb 16, 2020 11:05 pm
I've published a new version up above, with the following notable changes:
  1. You can now manually override final rankings (shown when reporting All Games)
  2. Use of "phase"/"stage" record to compute final rankings is now on by default. If this produces undesirable results, see #1 (or turn it off via the report settings).
  3. You can now export results in tournament schema (qbj) version 2.0 format. The main motivation for this is to be able to send more detailed results to NAQT than is possible with the SQBS format. However, there will undoubtedly be some kinks to work out, so I would advise sending NAQT both qbj and sqbs files for the time being.
  4. Basic lightning round support
Also, there's a website
Are there any plans to build a web-based version of this software that could provide live stats? BI used Neg5 yesterday primarily so I don't have to stand over my stats people, waiting for them to enter the sheets, and then upload a new stat report, before I go announce award winners and seeds for rebrackets. Neg5 makes that SUPER convenient, and it's the reason I use it, despite Yellow Fruit's superior interface.
Thank you for staffing yesterday, btw.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:05 pm
by Ndg
Wow, sorry about that. Thanks for fixing it so quickly.
ScoBo wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:06 pm
Fixed the database to accept this. Sorry for the inconvenience. Anyone who uploaded stats this weekend might want to check if their games reports are missing and re-upload if it is.
While we're on the subject of what the database will and won't accept -- it would be cool to be able upload pages with <tfoot> tags in them. :smile:

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 3:17 pm
by Ndg
the return of AHAN wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 2:53 pm
Are there any plans to build a web-based version of this software that could provide live stats? BI used Neg5 yesterday primarily so I don't have to stand over my stats people, waiting for them to enter the sheets, and then upload a new stat report, before I go announce award winners and seeds for rebrackets. Neg5 makes that SUPER convenient, and it's the reason I use it, despite Yellow Fruit's superior interface.
Thank you for staffing yesterday, btw.
Not right now, no. Maybe in the long term once I've finished all the other enhancements I can think of, but it's not something I have any idea how to do right now, so I'm not inclined to prioritize it.

Furthermore, I like the hsquizbowl database being the central repository for (non-NAQT) stats, and I'm reluctant to create yet another place people have to search for stats if they don't know where they are.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:54 am
by Joshua Rutsky
I'd just like to say that we used YellowFruit yesterday for the Alabama State MS and ES championships, and it ran beautifully. The update to make worksheet/lightning rounds function was a godsend, and the interface is much easier than SQBS with one exception - in SQBS, you can tab into the field for team selection and begin typing the name of the team that is playing; in YellowFruit I was forced to click each time and select the field with my mouse before I could enter the team name. I don't know if that's a shortcut I'm missing or not, but it would be a nice fix for a future version. I also was a little uncertain about the way to set up field rankings manually, but eventually figured it out.

Thank you for this effort, and thank you to all of the folks out there taking time to write these great projects on their own time because they love the game.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 2:16 pm
by Atlashill
Joshua Rutsky wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:54 am
the interface is much easier than SQBS with one exception - in SQBS, you can tab into the field for team selection and begin typing the name of the team that is playing; in YellowFruit I was forced to click each time and select the field with my mouse before I could enter the team name. I don't know if that's a shortcut I'm missing or not, but it would be a nice fix for a future version.
I'd also like to echo this suggestion, and likewise my gratitude for considering everyone's suggestions to developing this software. If you were to set up a Patreon, I suspect a few of us would happily make a contribution.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2020 12:50 pm
by Ndg
Atlashill wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 2:16 pm
Joshua Rutsky wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:54 am
the interface is much easier than SQBS with one exception - in SQBS, you can tab into the field for team selection and begin typing the name of the team that is playing; in YellowFruit I was forced to click each time and select the field with my mouse before I could enter the team name. I don't know if that's a shortcut I'm missing or not, but it would be a nice fix for a future version.
I'd also like to echo this suggestion,
I think I figured out a way to fix this. Hopefully it'll look decent. We'll see. In the meantime, I would point out that you can press Enter or the down arrow rather than clicking, although I realize that there isn't actually any visual indication of when the dropdown has focus.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2020 1:32 pm
by Ndg
Joshua Rutsky wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:54 am
I also was a little uncertain about the way to set up field rankings manually, but eventually figured it out.
Looking at your stat reports, I think some of the weirdness is because you had single-elim playoffs (or maybe not quite... I can't tell) so you didn't actually have pools/divisions for the playoffs. I think if you just don't use a grouping phase, you'll get one big list of teams sorted in the right order since you already entered all of the rankings, and that will probably look nicer than grouping them by their prelim brackets.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 11:08 am
by Joshua Rutsky
Ndg wrote:
Wed Feb 26, 2020 12:50 pm
Atlashill wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 2:16 pm
Joshua Rutsky wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:54 am
the interface is much easier than SQBS with one exception - in SQBS, you can tab into the field for team selection and begin typing the name of the team that is playing; in YellowFruit I was forced to click each time and select the field with my mouse before I could enter the team name. I don't know if that's a shortcut I'm missing or not, but it would be a nice fix for a future version.
I'd also like to echo this suggestion,
I think I figured out a way to fix this. Hopefully it'll look decent. We'll see. In the meantime, I would point out that you can press Enter or the down arrow rather than clicking, although I realize that there isn't actually any visual indication of when the dropdown has focus.

Ah! Didn't realize that was an option, and I guess I never hit the enter key while I had the focus on that dropdown. That makes everything much easier.

Yeah, you're probably right about the ranking issue, but maybe adding a short explanation of how to make this work to your help page would be useful. I'll see if I can work one up quickly and share it with you if you will PM me an address. No need for you to do all the work. :)

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:19 pm
by Illinois Admin
Came across what looks like an error of some sort. All of the headings for this entry are shifted 1 to the left starting with ppg.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:57 pm
by Atlashill
Illinois Admin wrote:
Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:19 pm
Came across what looks like an error of some sort. All of the headings for this entry are shifted 1 to the left starting with ppg.
It looks like you didn't specify any divisions? If that's the case, then it looks like that cell was omitted altogether, rather than a blank space created to fill in.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2020 7:07 pm
by Illinois Admin
Atlashill wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:57 pm
Illinois Admin wrote:
Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:19 pm
Came across what looks like an error of some sort. All of the headings for this entry are shifted 1 to the left starting with ppg.
It looks like you didn't specify any divisions? If that's the case, then it looks like that cell was omitted altogether, rather than a blank space created to fill in.
That seems to be another issue. I specified divisions (each team is assigned to one) but it will not show up in the exported results

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2020 7:07 pm
by Ndg
Atlashill wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:57 pm
Illinois Admin wrote:
Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:19 pm
Came across what looks like an error of some sort. All of the headings for this entry are shifted 1 to the left starting with ppg.
It looks like you didn't specify any divisions? If that's the case, then it looks like that cell was omitted altogether, rather than a blank space created to fill in.
yeah, the workaround here would be to actually implement the playoff divisions that the tournament used. (Edit: that was not the problem) Things tend to be a little weird when you're using phases or divisions but not both.

Obviously, still a bug. I'll fix it at some point. Not really in any hurry since there won't be any more stats for anyone to enter for a while.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2020 7:37 pm
by Ndg
Illinois Admin wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2020 7:07 pm
Atlashill wrote:
Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:57 pm
Illinois Admin wrote:
Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:19 pm
Came across what looks like an error of some sort. All of the headings for this entry are shifted 1 to the left starting with ppg.
It looks like you didn't specify any divisions? If that's the case, then it looks like that cell was omitted altogether, rather than a blank space created to fill in.
That seems to be another issue. I specified divisions (each team is assigned to one) but it will not show up in the exported results
Turned out to be an issue with setting the correct phase's divisions to group teams by. I'm still working on making that more intuitive and discoverable.

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Thu May 21, 2020 11:07 pm
by nick.
For me, it appears the mac version of 2.5.1 crashes on launch every time I try to open it. Is that just me or is it widespread?

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 2:52 pm
by Ndg
nick. wrote:
Thu May 21, 2020 11:07 pm
For me, it appears the mac version of 2.5.1 crashes on launch every time I try to open it. Is that just me or is it widespread?
I have not heard of anything like this happening. Any further details you can give me would be helpful (maybe).

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 7:47 pm
by nick.
Ok, so whenever I open YellowFruit 2.5.1 on my laptop, it crashes and I get this crash report. Link to the full report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kqm ... sp=sharing

Re: Introducing YellowFruit.

Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 9:28 pm
by Ndg
Thanks. I'm hopeful that some upgrades I've been planning to make soon will fix this. I'll have a new version out at some point this summer and I guess we'll see. Other than that there's not a whole lot of information to go off of.