Ill start it off.
"the hardest decision the captain has to make in this"
I buzzed, said cricket, and got weird looks from the other team

Circa Siesta Bowl 05.
i think we might have been reading those packets a few weeks ago. i powere stoudemire and OOTP as well, but not paddington. nice oneAirJay wrote:umm..searching my memories...
"The name is the same. Point guard Damon" BUZZ
Answer: Stoudamire
"He is sent by his Aunt Lucy" BUZZ
Answer: Paddington Bear
"Located at (some number) Grimmauld Place" BUZZ
Answer: (long pause) The Order of the Phoenix
That is all I can think of for now
I'm not sure if list-memorization stuff counts as a really good power. . .Winner of the 1996 Pulitzer Prize for Drama *buzz*
me: Rent
I'd say that the "you got the question right before you knew what they were asking, ergo cheating" protest is more common than it probably should be, but gratefully, I've never seen or heard of it working, though it definitely fits in our stereotype :) I know I've wanted to use it against a team before; once against Byron:Matt Weiner wrote:Is the "you got the question right, ergo you were cheating" protest common/acceptable in Illinois? It seems to be coming up a lot in this thread.Tegan wrote:I even had to agree with the opposing coach that there is no way my guy could know that.
Gratefully, it is far less common than it used to be....mostly because the players keep getting better, and coaches are aware that it really is possible for players to pull the impossible answer out of the aether. About the only coaches that do this are coaches with minimal experience (who think their team is the best team on Earth), and then run into one of the several others who are much better.Matt Weiner wrote: Is the "you got the question right, ergo you were cheating" protest common/acceptable in Illinois? It seems to be coming up a lot in this thread.
I used to do that at tournaments that actually followed a decent guideline. As for being accused of cheating, I have been accused by some idiot coach after getting a Beaumarchais pretty early. I think it may have been because the coach had never heard of Beaumarchais.Tegan wrote:Gratefully, it is far less common than it used to be....mostly because the players keep getting better, and coaches are aware that it really is possible for players to pull the impossible answer out of the aether. About the only coaches that do this are coaches with minimal experience (who think their team is the best team on Earth), and then run into one of the several others who are much better.Matt Weiner wrote: Is the "you got the question right, ergo you were cheating" protest common/acceptable in Illinois? It seems to be coming up a lot in this thread.
edit: and to clarify, it would only be acceptable if there was concrete proof for the moderator (as in the moderator actually saw someone actually cheating).
The only time a coach called me for cheating was on the "Tivoli (Garden)" question. Since Illinois has strict category requirements (6 Social Studies out of 30), I knew the last question was social studies. I also knew that there had not been one geography question. I called a time out, told the team "Here comes social studies", and turned to my geography wunderkid and said "And there hasn't been a geography question yet...be ready." One of the opposing players overheard me, and told his coach immediately after we won. We got it straightened out, and that team goes to a lot more tournaments now. As in all things: education defeats ignorance.
Welcome to our complaints. Help us out in the quest for decent questions. And don't feel bad about these, they go away after awhile. Pretty soon it'll be sixth derivative of cos(x), and tan(-45).airmale007 wrote:We recently played a match with the easiest, most powerable math questions ever.
Things like "What is sin(90)?" or "What is the derivative of cos(x)?"
Not kidding. And this is VARSITY.
Mike, you're right about that. We have a big problem (and we're not alone I can see from the postings here) of seeing a wide range of questions covering all ability levels (from really bad, up through NAQT and NAQT inspired questions). Our state series question writers break questions down, with the best and toughest questions being used in the state finals, and the easier, more obvious questions used in the Regional. I prepare my kids for this by telling them not to overthink too much at the Regional level. Had this been a match later in the series, I would have cautioned against it. In this case, I had to stop them from thinking too much, and tell them to have the courage to "think obvious"......of course, the Roman Tivoli still cuold have been somewhat obvious as well.MikeWormdog wrote:...you were still lucky on that Tivoli question, since the answer could just as easily have had something to do with Rome
I certainly hope they didn't ask him to spell it ;)dsfquizbowl wrote:He also guessed "Bool" correctly in a math history question.
just curious what you guys thought of this answer. First, all credit to you airmale007 for the power. Darrow is the first name that came to my mind too..but at what point do you hesitate on a lead-in like that? Do you consider the format (i.e. the difficulty of the questions)? For example, that seems like a give-away lead-in for an NAQT IS packet...but when you get to the national level won't blitzing on something like that hurt you?airmale007 wrote:" He was the lawyer for the defense-"
BUZZ
Clarence Darrow