Page 2 of 2
Re: Crowdsourced Head to Head Rankings
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:39 pm
by The Ununtiable Twine
sephirothrr wrote:in good faith
GROAN
Re: Crowdsourced Head to Head Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:13 am
by bradleykirksey
Is that why Harvard is 4th?
Re: Crowdsourced Head to Head Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 2:19 am
by Frauny Von Smiley
At the time I posted this, William & Mary was ranked 13th. While I appreciate the vote of confidence, I think this may indicate that some people may not be using this program properly.
Re: Crowdsourced Head to Head Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 4:20 am
by bradleykirksey
UCF has been everywhere from 9th to dead last. I don't think either is overly accurate. I'm in the same boat.
Re: Crowdsourced Head to Head Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 9:22 am
by Muriel Axon
Anyone seeking to use this to spur their memory for the Mid-Season Poll should note that Vanderbilt isn't on here, and there may be other contenders left off (Rutgers, maybe?).
Re: Crowdsourced Head to Head Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:22 am
by Chimalpahin Quauhtlehuanitzin
Vanderbilt isn't on here
Unfortunately, none of us have any indication that Henry is going to play ICT DI or ACF Nats, or anything at all for that matter. Thus we're only playing ICT DII as our nationals for this year.
Re: Crowdsourced Head to Head Rankings
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:30 pm
by Rococo A Go Go
Yeah the Vandy kids are cool and probably going to be really good in the next couple years, but I can see leaving them off the list considering they haven't played a regular difficulty tournament yet. Henry might as well be Matt Keller, as far as their current quizbowl team goes, if pretty much every indication is correct.
With all that being said, it's important to look at D2 teams from SCT to not only see what young teams (like Vanderbilt) are coming along really nicely, but which teams (like Northwestern and North Carolina) are really good but split their lineups between the divisions.