buzzer system lockout discussion

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
Locked
User avatar
vcpavao
Lulu
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:02 pm
Location: Somerville, MA

buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by vcpavao » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:03 pm

(discussion split from this thread --mgmt.)

This could have already been addressed (I haven't looked at every single post on this thread), and I'm not exactly sure this is the appropriate place to post this complaint, but I will post it anyway...

I am glad teams volunteer buzzer systems to nationals, but unfortunately there are cases where certain buzzer systems should not be used.

There was one kind of buzzer system that destroyed me in two bee rounds. Basically in this kind of buzzer system, if one player buzzed and answered incorrectly, and then another player tried to "spam" the buzzer to get in right after the buzzer cleared, that second person would be locked out for the rest of the question and couldn't answer at all. Considering how all other bee and bowl rooms had buzzers that allowed spamming, I thought it was kind of unfair.

I know spamming is a really common tactic in quiz bowl/history bowl, so I didn't think that specific kind of buzzer system should have been used. However, I didn't think buzzers could be protested so I didn't bring it to attention. Unfortunately, it cost me a few points in the bee but I hope that each buzzer system is tested next year.

My only complaint- otherwise a really stellar event that was well-planned. All thanks to Dave Madden and those who helped him!

Victor Pavao
Acton-Boxborough '14, Villanova '18
Somerville, MA

User avatar
jonpin
Forums Staff: Moderator
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: BCA NJ / WUSTL MO / Hackensack NJ

Re: NHBB Nationals thread

Post by jonpin » Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:30 pm

So, a couple things here:
1) Personally, I don't see "spamming" (which I assume to mean holding your buzzer down as the mod clears) as a behavior which needs to get special protection. As it is, if 2+ people are both doing that, the system is going to have to randomly determine the winner anyway.
2) I kinda doubt that the mechanism you've described exists in any currently-used buzzer system. I've certainly never heard of it until just now.
3) Were it to exist, I'm not at all sure how one would reasonably "test" for this in a buzzer check. Every buzzer system should be and to my knowledge is tested when it's set up and at the start of every game. If you think your buzzer is malfunctioning, it is and has always been the player's responsibility to say something and request a buzzer check immediately.
4) Lastly... you've suggested that certain buzzers be banned from use at NHBB without actually describing them in any meaningful way. You might want to clarify that. Even if it's not a brand name, a physical/visual description might help others to identify it.
Jon Pinyan
Coach, Bergen County Academies (NJ); former player for BCA (2000-03) and WUSTL (2003-07)
HSQB forum mod, PACE member
Stat director for: NSC '13-'15, '17; ACF '14, '17, '19; NHBB '13-'15; NASAT '11

"A [...] wizard who controls the weather" - Jerry Vinokurov

Urech hydantoin synthesis
Tidus
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:35 pm

Re: NHBB Nationals thread

Post by Urech hydantoin synthesis » Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:33 am

I agree with Jon in that it's not really worth doing anything about, but Victor's claims aren't entirely baseless - at the Bee, I experienced something similar with these buzzersystems.com buzzers. Basically, when one player continually presses the button before the buzzers are clear, the system recognizes neither that player nor any other player who buzzes in even when the light from the previous buzz has been cleared. The moderator had everyone stop buzzing for a short while, and then it became a game of chicken regarding when the appropriate time to buzz in again was.
Ben Zhang

Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell '23
Columbia University '18
Ladue Horton Watkins HS '14

Great Bustard
Auron
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: DC, NJ, and everywhere else
Contact:

Re: NHBB Nationals thread

Post by Great Bustard » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:10 am

This whole topic of buzzer systems and how they react to attempts to get an edge by a student holding it down while someone else has rung in is a topic worthy of discussion, but in a different thread. Can a moderator move the prior 3 posts to its own thread under the Misc. forum?
David Madden
Ridgewood (NJ) '99, Princeton '03
Founder and Director: International History Bee and Bowl, National History Bee and Bowl (High School Division), International History Olympiad, United States Geography Olympiad, US History Bee, US Academic Bee and Bowl, National Humanities Bee, National Science Bee, International Academic Bowl.
Adviser and former head coach for Team USA at the International Geography Olympiad

User avatar
Auks Ran Ova
Forums Staff: Chief Administrator
Posts: 4061
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Minneapolis
Contact:

Re: NHBB Nationals thread

Post by Auks Ran Ova » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:21 am

Great Bustard wrote:This whole topic of buzzer systems and how they react to attempts to get an edge by a student holding it down while someone else has rung in is a topic worthy of discussion, but in a different thread. Can a moderator move the prior 3 posts to its own thread under the Misc. forum?
Yes!
Rob Carson
University of Minnesota '11, MCTC '??
Member, ACF
Member, PACE
Writer and Editor, NAQT

User avatar
vcpavao
Lulu
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:02 pm
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: NHBB Nationals thread

Post by vcpavao » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:00 pm

christino wrote:I agree with Jon in that it's not really worth doing anything about, but Victor's claims aren't entirely baseless - at the Bee, I experienced something similar with these buzzersystems.com buzzers. Basically, when one player continually presses the button before the buzzers are clear, the system recognizes neither that player nor any other player who buzzes in even when the light from the previous buzz has been cleared. The moderator had everyone stop buzzing for a short while, and then it became a game of chicken regarding when the appropriate time to buzz in again was.
That link shows the kind of buzzer I was talking about. I also would like to clarify - I am not trying to get special protection for spamming, I just don't believe that spamming should be punished due to its widespread use. Even when the question was completed and was going to be dead, I couldn't buzz in with my answer because the system still had me locked out. If we don't do anything about it, could we at least allow kids in this situation to direct an answer to the moderator, even if their buzzer was cancelled?

Victor Pavao
Acton-Boxborough '14, Villanova '18
Somerville, MA

User avatar
jonpin
Forums Staff: Moderator
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: BCA NJ / WUSTL MO / Hackensack NJ

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by jonpin » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:40 pm

There is always the ability to say "BUZZ" if one's buzzer is malfunctioning. Admittedly this is a not perfect solution in the Bee (in a team competition, it either results in an uncontested answer or a question being thrown out), and people new to quiz bowl may not realize this is an option, but moderators tend to be understanding of buzzer issues and if no one is buzzing and you're frantically trying to buzz and it's not working, say something and they'll recognize you.
Jon Pinyan
Coach, Bergen County Academies (NJ); former player for BCA (2000-03) and WUSTL (2003-07)
HSQB forum mod, PACE member
Stat director for: NSC '13-'15, '17; ACF '14, '17, '19; NHBB '13-'15; NASAT '11

"A [...] wizard who controls the weather" - Jerry Vinokurov

Mnemosyne
Wakka
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:11 am

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by Mnemosyne » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:36 pm

I actually thought it was common sense/universal knowledge to spaz out while frantically waving your hands saying "buzz, buzz, I'm trying to buzz!!" when a buzzer doesn't work. That's how it's always been in my games since probably the first tournament I ever went to.
Nick Collins
C. E. Byrd '12 (Shreveport, LA)
Louisiana Tech '16, '17
University of Virginia

User avatar
etchdulac
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 6:02 am
Location: Texas, for better or worse

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by etchdulac » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:04 pm

jonpin wrote:moderators tend to be understanding of buzzer issues and if no one is buzzing and you're frantically trying to buzz and it's not working, say something and they'll recognize you.
Mnemosyne wrote:I actually thought it was common sense/universal knowledge to spaz out while frantically waving your hands saying "buzz, buzz, I'm trying to buzz!!" when a buzzer doesn't work.
You'd like to think that, but one of my local teams got ignored completely while doing that in an HSNCT playoff game they lost by 45.
Stephen Fontenot
Texas Quiz Bowl Alliance Deputy Director
Communications, UT Dallas
Strake Jesuit '96 -+-+- Southwestern '00

jagluski
Wakka
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:59 am

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by jagluski » Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:00 pm

etchdulac wrote:
jonpin wrote:moderators tend to be understanding of buzzer issues and if no one is buzzing and you're frantically trying to buzz and it's not working, say something and they'll recognize you.
Mnemosyne wrote:I actually thought it was common sense/universal knowledge to spaz out while frantically waving your hands saying "buzz, buzz, I'm trying to buzz!!" when a buzzer doesn't work.
You'd like to think that, but one of my local teams got ignored completely while doing that in an HSNCT playoff game they lost by 45.
This is not true. The team in question never audibly said buzz or waved their hands or anything. In addition, the staffers in the room never heard them try to buzz.
Joel Gluskin
WUSTL '04
NAQT Vice President for Logistics

User avatar
etchdulac
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 6:02 am
Location: Texas, for better or worse

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by etchdulac » Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:18 pm

jagluski wrote:
etchdulac wrote:
jonpin wrote:moderators tend to be understanding of buzzer issues and if no one is buzzing and you're frantically trying to buzz and it's not working, say something and they'll recognize you.
Mnemosyne wrote:I actually thought it was common sense/universal knowledge to spaz out while frantically waving your hands saying "buzz, buzz, I'm trying to buzz!!" when a buzzer doesn't work.
You'd like to think that, but one of my local teams got ignored completely while doing that in an HSNCT playoff game they lost by 45.
This is not true. The team in question never audibly said buzz or waved their hands or anything. In addition, the staffers in the room never heard them try to buzz.
That was not at all their story by the time they got to me. If those were the facts I was given, I would never have initiated our earlier conversation, after which I thought we were working with the same information. I will ask them to clarify the situation.
Stephen Fontenot
Texas Quiz Bowl Alliance Deputy Director
Communications, UT Dallas
Strake Jesuit '96 -+-+- Southwestern '00

User avatar
etchdulac
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 6:02 am
Location: Texas, for better or worse

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by etchdulac » Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:34 pm

etchdulac wrote:That was not at all their story by the time they got to me. If those were the facts I was given, I would never have initiated our earlier conversation, after which I thought we were working with the same information. I will ask them to clarify the situation.
So their story is that their guy audibly buzzed first, the buzzer failed, and he was yelling buzz when the other team buzzed in. Still a situation where it should've been tossed once the buzzer malfunction was confirmed. The staffers acknowledged the issue after giving the other team the bonus cycle, said they'd return to the issue if it mattered (which shouldn't apply to that kind of issue anyway), then declined to do anything about it even though the game was close.

So my initial point stands: There's apparently not a consensus about what to do when this happens.
Stephen Fontenot
Texas Quiz Bowl Alliance Deputy Director
Communications, UT Dallas
Strake Jesuit '96 -+-+- Southwestern '00

User avatar
Skepticism and Animal Feed
Auron
Posts: 3184
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:47 pm
Location: Arlington, VA

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by Skepticism and Animal Feed » Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:44 pm

Somebody in the other thread said that different systems have different ways of breaking a tie between simultaneous buzzes, and that in some cases there's always one color that wins, etc. This seems like incredibly relevant information that should be shared with the community.
Bruce
Harvard '10 / UChicago '07 / Roycemore School '04
ACF Member emeritus
My guide to using Wikipedia as a question source

User avatar
etchdulac
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 6:02 am
Location: Texas, for better or worse

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by etchdulac » Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:52 pm

Skepticism and Animal Feed wrote:Somebody in the other thread said that different systems have different ways of breaking a tie between simultaneous buzzes, and that in some cases there's always one color that wins, etc. This seems like incredibly relevant information that should be shared with the community.
TQBA has at least one system that provides green, yellow and red for first, second, and third buzzes. Presumably, this is useful in some other competition; for us, it was particularly inconvenient for our red-green colorblind top reader.
Stephen Fontenot
Texas Quiz Bowl Alliance Deputy Director
Communications, UT Dallas
Strake Jesuit '96 -+-+- Southwestern '00

User avatar
Mike Bentley
Auron
Posts: 5833
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by Mike Bentley » Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:24 pm

I've been sitting on a buzzer design that uses some old PlayStation 2 USB buzzers that plug into a computer. It has the ability to do lockouts similar to IRC quizbowl where the first person is recognized and if he or she gets it incorrect, the next person who had buzzed in automatically lights up. That person can also withdrawal. This works all of the way down the nth person who buzzed in.

I could see this being useful in a Bee format, although it has some drawbacks. Mainly, if withdrawing is free then each player has the incentive to reaction buzz every time in the off chance that the answer does dawn on them. You could perhaps work around this with a system where someone has to write down the answer they were going to buzz on in order to be allowed to withdrawal, but this has its own problems.
Mike Bentley
VP of Editing, Partnership for Academic Competition Excellence
Adviser, Quizbowl Team at University of Washington
University of Maryland, Class of 2008

User avatar
AKKOLADE
Sin
Posts: 15276
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:08 am

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by AKKOLADE » Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:31 pm

etchdulac wrote:
etchdulac wrote:That was not at all their story by the time they got to me. If those were the facts I was given, I would never have initiated our earlier conversation, after which I thought we were working with the same information. I will ask them to clarify the situation.
So their story is that their guy audibly buzzed first, the buzzer failed, and he was yelling buzz when the other team buzzed in. Still a situation where it should've been tossed once the buzzer malfunction was confirmed. The staffers acknowledged the issue after giving the other team the bonus cycle, said they'd return to the issue if it mattered (which shouldn't apply to that kind of issue anyway), then declined to do anything about it even though the game was close.

So my initial point stands: There's apparently not a consensus about what to do when this happens.
Why do you keep doing this?
Fred Morlan
PACE President, 2018-19
International Quiz Bowl Tournaments, co-owner
University of Kentucky CoP, 2017
hsqbrank manager, NAQT writer (former subject editor), former hsqb Administrator/Chief Administrator, 2012 NASAT TD

jagluski
Wakka
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:59 am

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by jagluski » Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:58 pm

etchdulac wrote:
etchdulac wrote:That was not at all their story by the time they got to me. If those were the facts I was given, I would never have initiated our earlier conversation, after which I thought we were working with the same information. I will ask them to clarify the situation.
So their story is that their guy audibly buzzed first, the buzzer failed, and he was yelling buzz when the other team buzzed in. Still a situation where it should've been tossed once the buzzer malfunction was confirmed. The staffers acknowledged the issue after giving the other team the bonus cycle, said they'd return to the issue if it mattered (which shouldn't apply to that kind of issue anyway), then declined to do anything about it even though the game was close.

So my initial point stands: There's apparently not a consensus about what to do when this happens.
This is not the story they told R. Hentzel at the tournament. They never said anything about yelling buzz and I find it nearly impossible that they would leave this information out when talking to the president of NAQT.

In addition, as has been stated many times previously, neither the moderator nor the scorekeeper heard this team trying to buzz and definitively stated no one yelled buzz.

Edited to fix a typo
Joel Gluskin
WUSTL '04
NAQT Vice President for Logistics

User avatar
etchdulac
Rikku
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 6:02 am
Location: Texas, for better or worse

Re: buzzer system lockout discussion

Post by etchdulac » Wed Jun 18, 2014 4:16 pm

Dr. Loki Skylizard, Thoracic Surgeon wrote:
etchdulac wrote:
etchdulac wrote:That was not at all their story by the time they got to me. If those were the facts I was given, I would never have initiated our earlier conversation, after which I thought we were working with the same information. I will ask them to clarify the situation.
So their story is that their guy audibly buzzed first, the buzzer failed, and he was yelling buzz when the other team buzzed in. Still a situation where it should've been tossed once the buzzer malfunction was confirmed. The staffers acknowledged the issue after giving the other team the bonus cycle, said they'd return to the issue if it mattered (which shouldn't apply to that kind of issue anyway), then declined to do anything about it even though the game was close.

So my initial point stands: There's apparently not a consensus about what to do when this happens.
Why do you keep doing this?
Because how to handle a buzzer malfunction is not in the traditional rules conversation for staff in the open of a tournament. Perhaps it should be.

Not sure how verifying a team's story qualifies as a "keep doing this" -- there is a reasonable objective to this: identifying a place where rules may not be getting applied the same way for future pre-emptive clarification in moderator meetings.
Stephen Fontenot
Texas Quiz Bowl Alliance Deputy Director
Communications, UT Dallas
Strake Jesuit '96 -+-+- Southwestern '00

Locked