2016 ICT general discussion

Old college threads.
Locked
User avatar
Important Bird Area
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5518
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Contact:

2016 ICT general discussion

Post by Important Bird Area » Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:34 pm

This is your discussion thread for big-picture issues about the 2016 NAQT ICT (either division). If you'd like to discuss the specific text of a particular question, please use the two threads available for that purpose.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF

"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred

User avatar
theMoMA
Forums Staff: Administrator
Posts: 5689
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:00 am

Re: 2016 ICT general discussion

Post by theMoMA » Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:19 am

Hey, Seth might drop by later for a full rundown, but I just wanted to say thanks to a couple people who deserve it. Matt Bollinger served as a set editor this year, and it was great to have his input. Ike went through the set and offered helpful comments on difficulty. Seth put in a ton of work as the primary set editor, and Andrew did as well in many different areas. I think there's still a good bit of improvement that we can do with ICT, but I really liked how this year's turned out, and it was in large part thanks to these people.
Andrew Hart
Minnesota alum

User avatar
setht
Auron
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: 2016 ICT general discussion

Post by setht » Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:49 am

theMoMA wrote:Hey, Seth might drop by later for a full rundown, but I just wanted to say thanks to a couple people who deserve it. Matt Bollinger served as a set editor this year, and it was great to have his input. Ike went through the set and offered helpful comments on difficulty. Seth put in a ton of work as the primary set editor, and Andrew did as well in many different areas. I think there's still a good bit of improvement that we can do with ICT, but I really liked how this year's turned out, and it was in large part thanks to these people.
I actually would guess that Andrew H. and/or Andrew Y. put in more time working on the DI set this year than I did. I just did not have as much time to devote to it as I would have liked, but thankfully they stepped up, and we got valuable editing help from Matt B., Ike, Billy, and Jeff.

In DII, R. Hentzel and Jason Thompson teamed up to cover the set editing. I am very grateful that they left me free to focus almost entirely on the DI set.

We also benefited from receiving lots of excellent questions from a large group of people. I'm not going to list all the writers who contributed to this year's set, but I want to thank them heartily.

-Seth
Seth Teitler
Formerly UC Berkeley and U. Chicago
President and Chief Editor, NAQT
Emeritus member, ACF

User avatar
Excelsior (smack)
Rikku
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:20 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: 2016 ICT general discussion

Post by Excelsior (smack) » Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:42 pm

I don't know if this is new as of ICT 2016 or what (I haven't read any NAQT since HSNCT 2015), but I want to commend NAQT on their significantly improved styling of pronunciation guides in the packets. They are now _much_ easier to ignore for words I know how to pronounce, allowing me to read more quickly and articulately. (But one side note: the "u" in "ukiyo-e" is not pronounced /ju/ "YOU", but rather /u/ "OO".)
Ashvin Srivatsa
Corporate drone '?? | Yale University '14 | Sycamore High School (OH) '10

User avatar
Benin Rebirth Party
Yuna
Posts: 789
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: Farhaven, Ontario

Re: 2016 ICT general discussion

Post by Benin Rebirth Party » Tue Apr 12, 2016 3:03 pm

I really liked the "other science" in this set.
Joe Su
Lisgar 2012, McGill 2015, McGill 20--

FINALIST -- 2017 ILQBM MEME OF THE YEAR

User avatar
Wynaut
Wakka
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:34 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: 2016 ICT general discussion

Post by Wynaut » Tue Apr 12, 2016 3:19 pm

The geography was really enjoyable and well-clued; a lot of the leadins and hard parts definitely sounded like they were worth knowing about. I also certainly wasn't expecting a whole tossup on Iqaluit! The one exception that comes to mind is the Chad bonus that pretty much relied on knowing its highest point.

The current events stuff was also pretty cool -- I especially liked the way tossups like "impeaching Dilma" and "Trump's wall" were constructed. More questions on hypothetical actions, please!
Kenji Shimizu
University of Michigan '18
Summit Academy North High School '13
Writer, NAQT
"...the best Seychelles player in quizbowl" -Auroni Gupta

User avatar
ryanrosenberg
Auron
Posts: 1351
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 5:48 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: 2016 ICT general discussion

Post by ryanrosenberg » Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:16 am

Pursuant the discussion in the tiebreaker thread, Round 8 of DI ICT had two American history tossups in the first half (plus an American CE tossup).
Ryan Rosenberg
North Carolina '16 | Ardsley '12
PACE | ACF

Locked