Illinois '17-'18

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
User avatar
Irreligion in Bangladesh
Auron
Posts: 2123
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Winnebago, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Irreligion in Bangladesh »

Taking the philosophy described in the previous post to its natural conclusion, you can expect harder questions at Sectionals and State. In particular, Setional rounds 4/5/6 are all meant to be of a certain level, then the State rounds 7/8/9 of a certain level harder than that, then the Championship packet 10 a certain level harder than that.
Brad Fischer
Head Editor, IHSA State Series
IHSSBCA Chair

Winnebago HS ('06)
Northern Illinois University ('10)
Assistant Coach, IMSA (2010-12)
Coach, Keith Country Day School (2012-16)
User avatar
Irreligion in Bangladesh
Auron
Posts: 2123
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Winnebago, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Irreligion in Bangladesh »

I have O'Fallon's scoresheets; you can now talk openly about question content from Regionals.
Brad Fischer
Head Editor, IHSA State Series
IHSSBCA Chair

Winnebago HS ('06)
Northern Illinois University ('10)
Assistant Coach, IMSA (2010-12)
Coach, Keith Country Day School (2012-16)
User avatar
dtaylor4
Auron
Posts: 3733
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:43 am

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by dtaylor4 »

TylerV wrote:What did throw me into a rage however was a lit answerline, which I am unsure if its clear so I won't reveal it, which I felt was overly strict. This ended up not mattering in the room I was in but I think it easily could have caused issues.
Was it the "sword fight" answerline? I think it could have been better served with a moderator note prior to the tossup or a prompting instruction indicating what exactly was required. I saw something like this at Masonic State that fit the bill, but I obviously can't discuss the exact reference.
User avatar
mhasquin
Wakka
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:09 pm
Location: Piasa, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by mhasquin »

Irreligion in Bangladesh wrote:I have O'Fallon's scoresheets; you can now talk openly about question content from Regionals.
But the scores haven't been posted to Score Zone...

The scores are now posted.
Last edited by mhasquin on Tue Mar 06, 2018 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Matt Hasquin
Scholastic Bowl Coach - Southwestern High School - Piasa, Illinois
IHSSBCA Chair (2018-2022)
User avatar
TylerV
Wakka
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:58 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by TylerV »

dtaylor4 wrote:
TylerV wrote:What did throw me into a rage however was a lit answerline, which I am unsure if its clear so I won't reveal it, which I felt was overly strict. This ended up not mattering in the room I was in but I think it easily could have caused issues.
Was it the "sword fight" answerline? I think it could have been better served with a moderator note prior to the tossup or a prompting instruction indicating what exactly was required. I saw something like this at Masonic State that fit the bill, but I obviously can't discuss the exact reference.
Indeed it was. I felt the theme of the question was fantastic and the clues chosen with the expectation of |sword duel| being the required portion were extremely solid, but I don't see any reason that duel shouldn't just be accepted, what is there to be gained by asking kids to identify both the weapon and the event? I know I would never write a question on |gun duel|s (accept |pistol duel|s). I think the question would have been much better if the answerline would have been sword |duel|s or just |sword|.

All that being said, I know Noah Prince not to be an irrational person and I expect he will provide insight, either in this thread or in an email, that will make me, at the very least, understand his decision to make the answerline the way he did.
Tyler Vaughan
UW-Platteville, Rock Valley, UIUC 2014-2017
Southern New Hampshire University 2020 - ?

"God the automatic cat feeder might be the best invention ever" - Brad McLain
User avatar
Amiable Vitriol
Lulu
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:32 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Amiable Vitriol »

As an IL kiddo who played this, this set was awesome. Writing for teams as varied as the ones who play IHSA Regionals is a ridiculously hard task and y’all did a fantastic job. Stevenson wouldn’t typically be the target audience of a set of this difficulty, but I thought leadins/hard bonus parts generally distinguished really well between teams. Cheers to a new era of IHSA!

P.S. I answered with just duel on the Cyrano de Bergerac clue and got prompted. Was this not accepted later? I don’t think a prompt is too heinous.
luke fka olivia lamberti
daniel wright -> stevenson -> stanford
retired
TheAngryBavarian
Lulu
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2017 5:48 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by TheAngryBavarian »

If we are allowed to talk about specific questions, then I would agree that the "sword fight" one was strange. I believe I answered "brawl" or something to that effect, and was slightly surprised that I wasn't at least prompted. The only other one that I found strange was the question about the Gateway Arch. I believe the answer of simply "arch" was given and was not considered to be correct, which I found a smidgen harsh. It didn't affect the outcome of the matches, so I have no major issue with them, I was merely curious to see what people's opinion on them were.
Zach Roseman
Collinsville (IL) '20
Eastern Illinois University '24
"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants."-Isaac Newton
User avatar
TylerV
Wakka
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:58 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by TylerV »

TheAngryBavarian wrote:If we are allowed to talk about specific questions, then I would agree that the "sword fight" one was strange. I believe I answered "brawl" or something to that effect, and was slightly surprised that I wasn't at least prompted. The only other one that I found strange was the question about the Gateway Arch. I believe the answer of simply "arch" was given and was not considered to be correct, which I found a smidgen harsh. It didn't affect the outcome of the matches, so I have no major issue with them, I was merely curious to see what people's opinion on them were.
That is an odd one. If I am remembering the answerline correctly it instructed moderators to prompt on anything related to fighting, which I think a brawl obviously falls under.

In regards to "arch", I am in agreement with the packet. I'm not going to just say the standard, somewhat condescending, of "things have names" but I think that general idea plus the fact that everyone who played the set is in a state that borders Missouri makes the answerline fine. That being said, I don't believe the question ever says arch so I think a prompt would have been the merciful move.
Tyler Vaughan
UW-Platteville, Rock Valley, UIUC 2014-2017
Southern New Hampshire University 2020 - ?

"God the automatic cat feeder might be the best invention ever" - Brad McLain
User avatar
Dominator
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Dominator »

Olivia L wrote:P.S. I answered with just duel on the Cyrano de Bergerac clue and got prompted. Was this not accepted later? I don’t think a prompt is too heinous.
First off, nice buzz! That play is awesome, that clue is about a particularly awesome part of it, and I'm glad you got points for it.

"duel", "fight", and equivalents thereof should have been prompted throughout.
TheAngryBavarian wrote:The only other one that I found strange was the question about the Gateway Arch. I believe the answer of simply "arch" was given and was not considered to be correct, which I found a smidgen harsh.
At the risk of taking a Wienerian stance, things have names, and you need to say those names to get points. Is there any reason you felt that this question was not clearly asking for that specific one?
Dr. Noah Prince

Normal Community High School (2002)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004, 2007, 2008)

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy - Scholastic Bowl coach (2009-2014), assistant coach (2014-2015), well wisher (2015-2016)
guy in San Diego (2016-present)
President of Qblitz (2018-present)

Image
User avatar
hcube
Lulu
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:44 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by hcube »

First of all, thank you to everyone (Mr. Fischer, Andrew, Dr. Prince) for writing this set! It was definitely a step up from previous years, and I really enjoyed playing it! I'm looking forward to playing the Sectional packets and hopefully the State ones as well.

A couple things I noticed--

Science was well done.
Math was a lot better than last year as well.
In Rd 1, a lit bonus mentioned Crane (the answer) as being the author of Sister Carrie.
Also in Rd 1, a math tossup led-in with something to the effect of "...the gradient is an example of these things." The answer was "vector," but I buzzed there and said "derivative" and got negged. I feel the clue is a little misleading--to my understanding, the gradient is a multivariable extension of the derivative, and it is a vector field, not exactly a vector. Perhaps Andrew or Dr. Prince (sorry I forgot who wrote math) can clarify this for me.

In Rd 3, the tossup on "0 & 1" was really creative, and I liked it a lot. However, it struck me as a little out-of-place, since the clue I buzzed on (Kolmogorov, which wasn't the lead-in) was early in power for Lederberg 2 (College Open Science Tournament) for a tossup on Kolmogorov.
Last edited by hcube on Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Hanson Hao
IMSA 19
Stanford 23
User avatar
dtaylor4
Auron
Posts: 3733
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:43 am

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by dtaylor4 »

TylerV wrote:
TheAngryBavarian wrote:If we are allowed to talk about specific questions, then I would agree that the "sword fight" one was strange. I believe I answered "brawl" or something to that effect, and was slightly surprised that I wasn't at least prompted. The only other one that I found strange was the question about the Gateway Arch. I believe the answer of simply "arch" was given and was not considered to be correct, which I found a smidgen harsh. It didn't affect the outcome of the matches, so I have no major issue with them, I was merely curious to see what people's opinion on them were.
That is an odd one. If I am remembering the answerline correctly it instructed moderators to prompt on anything related to fighting, which I think a brawl obviously falls under.

In regards to "arch", I am in agreement with the packet. I'm not going to just say the standard, somewhat condescending, of "things have names" but I think that general idea plus the fact that everyone who played the set is in a state that borders Missouri makes the answerline fine. That being said, I don't believe the question ever says arch so I think a prompt would have been the merciful move.
The prompt never said arch, as I had this scenario come up in my room (and prompted the controlling team, who figured it out). I'm with Noah, thing has a specific name, and there's more than one famous arch.
User avatar
heterodyne
Rikku
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:47 am

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by heterodyne »

hcube wrote:First of all, thank you to everyone (Mr. Fischer, Mr. Wang, Mr. Prince) for writing this set! It was definitely a step up from previous years, and I really enjoyed playing it! I'm looking forward to playing the Sectional packets and hopefully the State ones as well.

A couple things I noticed--

Science was well done.
Math was a lot better than last year as well.
In Rd 1, a lit bonus mentioned Crane (the answer) as being the author of Sister Carrie.
Also in Rd 1, a math tossup led-in with something to the effect of "...the gradient is an example of these things." The answer was "vector," but I buzzed there and said "derivative" and got negged. I feel the clue is a little misleading--to my understanding, the gradient is a multivariable extension of the derivative, and it is a vector field, not exactly a vector. Perhaps Mr. Wang or Mr. Prince (sorry I forgot who wrote math) can clarify this for me.

In Rd 3, the tossup on "0 & 1" was really creative, and I liked it a lot. However, it struck me as a little out-of-place, since the clue I buzzed on (Kolmogorov, which wasn't the lead-in) was early in power for Lederberg 2 (College Open Science Tournament) for a tossup on Kolmogorov.
I, elsewhere wrote: While it's great that quality writers are taking over the production of IHSA questions, I'd just like to note that this certainly does not warrant referring to Andrew as Mr. Wang.
Alston [Montgomery] Boyd
Bloomington High School '15
UChicago '19
UChicago Divinity '21
they
User avatar
Dominator
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Dominator »

hcube wrote:In Rd 1, a lit bonus mentioned Crane (the answer) as being the author of Sister Carrie.
That shouldn't have happened.
hcube wrote:Also in Rd 1, a math tossup led-in with something to the effect of "...the gradient is an example of these things."


The gradient is a vector of partial derivatives. It is not itself a derivative.
hcube wrote:...and it is a vector field, not exactly a vector.
That's an interesting usage point. Now that you mention it, I have probably heard it used both ways.
hcube wrote:In Rd 3, the tossup on "0 & 1" was really creative, and I liked it a lot. However, it struck me as a little out-of-place, since the clue I buzzed on (Kolmogorov, which wasn't the lead-in) was early in power for Lederberg 2 (College Open Science Tournament) for a tossup on Kolmogorov.
I remember crushing that tossup on Kolmogorov and wondering where the question could possibly have gone from there. His name came up several times when I was in grad school, and usually because of his 0,1 Law.

Also...
hcube wrote:Mr. Prince
...come on, man!
Dr. Noah Prince

Normal Community High School (2002)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004, 2007, 2008)

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy - Scholastic Bowl coach (2009-2014), assistant coach (2014-2015), well wisher (2015-2016)
guy in San Diego (2016-present)
President of Qblitz (2018-present)

Image
User avatar
db0wman
Wakka
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 3:37 pm
Location: Champaign, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by db0wman »

I noticed that there was very little RMP on the regionals sets--was this put in place just at regionals so that the weaker teams would be able to convert a higher percentage of the questions, or is the low ratio going to be used at the sectionals and state tournaments as well?
Dylan Bowman
Uni '20; Illinois '23
User avatar
hcube
Lulu
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:44 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by hcube »

Dominator wrote:
Also...
hcube wrote:Mr. Prince
...come on, man!
Oops, sorry about that--fixed.
Last edited by hcube on Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hanson Hao
IMSA 19
Stanford 23
TheAngryBavarian
Lulu
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2017 5:48 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by TheAngryBavarian »

Dominator wrote:
Olivia L wrote:P.S. I answered with just duel on the Cyrano de Bergerac clue and got prompted. Was this not accepted later? I don’t think a prompt is too heinous.
First off, nice buzz! That play is awesome, that clue is about a particularly awesome part of it, and I'm glad you got points for it.

"duel", "fight", and equivalents thereof should have been prompted throughout.
TheAngryBavarian wrote:The only other one that I found strange was the question about the Gateway Arch. I believe the answer of simply "arch" was given and was not considered to be correct, which I found a smidgen harsh.
At the risk of taking a Wienerian stance, things have names, and you need to say those names to get points. Is there any reason you felt that this question was not clearly asking for that specific one?
No. That would make sense, so I guess that I was perhaps expecting a bit more leeway. No matter, just something I found slightly unusual.
Zach Roseman
Collinsville (IL) '20
Eastern Illinois University '24
"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants."-Isaac Newton
User avatar
Good Goblin Housekeeping
Auron
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 10:03 am

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Good Goblin Housekeeping »

db0wman wrote:I noticed that there was very little RMP on the regionals sets--was this put in place just at regionals so that the weaker teams would be able to convert a higher percentage of the questions, or is the low ratio going to be used at the sectionals and state tournaments as well?
this is more a result of the IHSA's distribution
Andrew Wang
Illinois 2016
User avatar
Irreligion in Bangladesh
Auron
Posts: 2123
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Winnebago, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Irreligion in Bangladesh »

I will note - hearing "zero-one law" and buzzing with Kolmogorov is a significantly different quizbowl experience than hearing "Kolomgorov" + a description of tail probabilities and thinking that "zero and one" might be the answer.
db0wman wrote:I noticed that there was very little RMP on the regionals sets--was this put in place just at regionals so that the weaker teams would be able to convert a higher percentage of the questions, or is the low ratio going to be used at the sectionals and state tournaments as well?
Andrew's right - the IHSA Terms and Conditions calls for 1/1 Myth (labeled as Literature), half as much Religion (labeled as Social Studies; it'll be either 1 tossup or 1 bonus in each game, with the complementary question going to Geography), and a comparable amount of Philosophy to Religion (Philosophy shares a 2/2 space with Current Events, Government, and other common SS topics like Psych, Anthro, Econ, etc.).
Brad Fischer
Head Editor, IHSA State Series
IHSSBCA Chair

Winnebago HS ('06)
Northern Illinois University ('10)
Assistant Coach, IMSA (2010-12)
Coach, Keith Country Day School (2012-16)
User avatar
Dominator
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Dominator »

Irreligion in Bangladesh wrote:I will note - hearing "zero-one law" and buzzing with Kolmogorov is a significantly different quizbowl experience than hearing "Kolomgorov" + a description of tail probabilities and thinking that "zero and one" might be the answer.
Brad is entirely right. (I forgot to complete this story after telling my anecdote.) Once we've established that the question is asking for two numbers AND they're probabilities of stuff, a really good fraud could work out a guess of 0 and 1. There is a lot more context in stating the clue this way than in the way Lederberg did, which asked for a guy based on some work that almost anyone could have done.
Dr. Noah Prince

Normal Community High School (2002)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004, 2007, 2008)

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy - Scholastic Bowl coach (2009-2014), assistant coach (2014-2015), well wisher (2015-2016)
guy in San Diego (2016-present)
President of Qblitz (2018-present)

Image
User avatar
hcube
Lulu
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:44 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by hcube »

Dominator wrote:
Irreligion in Bangladesh wrote:I will note - hearing "zero-one law" and buzzing with Kolmogorov is a significantly different quizbowl experience than hearing "Kolomgorov" + a description of tail probabilities and thinking that "zero and one" might be the answer.
Brad is entirely right. (I forgot to complete this story after telling my anecdote.) Once we've established that the question is asking for two numbers AND they're probabilities of stuff, a really good fraud could work out a guess of 0 and 1. There is a lot more context in stating the clue this way than in the way Lederberg did, which asked for a guy based on some work that almost anyone could have done.
Thanks for the clarification. During my match, I reflex-buzzed on the word Kolmogorov, so I don't think I heard any mention of probabilities (probably later in the same line). It makes a lot more sense now that I see it in context.
Hanson Hao
IMSA 19
Stanford 23
User avatar
Dominator
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Dominator »

hcube wrote:I reflex-buzzed on the word Kolmogorov
What have we done?!?!?!
Dr. Noah Prince

Normal Community High School (2002)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004, 2007, 2008)

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy - Scholastic Bowl coach (2009-2014), assistant coach (2014-2015), well wisher (2015-2016)
guy in San Diego (2016-present)
President of Qblitz (2018-present)

Image
Berniecrat
Tidus
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:54 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Berniecrat »

Thank you for writing the bonus on the 2018 Illinois Gubernatorial Election.

I enjoyed hearing the name "Daniel Biss"
Arjun Nageswaran
Aptakisic '17
Stevenson '21
Harvard '25
User avatar
the return of AHAN
Auron
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:40 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by the return of AHAN »

Berniecrat wrote:Thank you for writing the bonus on the 2018 Illinois Gubernatorial Election.

I enjoyed hearing the name "Daniel Biss"
You don't say...
https://www.danielbiss.com/chance/

Image
Jeff Price
Barrington High School Coach (2021 & 2023 HSNCT Champions, 2023 PACE Champions, 2023 Illinois Masonic Bowl Class 3A State Champions)
Barrington Station Middle School Coach (2013 MSNCT Champions, 2013 & 2017 Illinois Class AA State Champions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
dtaylor4
Auron
Posts: 3733
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:43 am

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by dtaylor4 »

Irreligion in Bangladesh wrote:I will note - hearing "zero-one law" and buzzing with Kolmogorov is a significantly different quizbowl experience than hearing "Kolomgorov" + a description of tail probabilities and thinking that "zero and one" might be the answer.
db0wman wrote:I noticed that there was very little RMP on the regionals sets--was this put in place just at regionals so that the weaker teams would be able to convert a higher percentage of the questions, or is the low ratio going to be used at the sectionals and state tournaments as well?
Andrew's right - the IHSA Terms and Conditions calls for 1/1 Myth (labeled as Literature), half as much Religion (labeled as Social Studies; it'll be either 1 tossup or 1 bonus in each game, with the complementary question going to Geography), and a comparable amount of Philosophy to Religion (Philosophy shares a 2/2 space with Current Events, Government, and other common SS topics like Psych, Anthro, Econ, etc.).
Basically, the distribution is booty. Any reason why the IHSA and Masonic sets didn't include sub-distributions in the question headers this year?
jonah
Auron
Posts: 2383
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:51 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by jonah »

dtaylor4 wrote:Any reason why the IHSA and Masonic sets didn't include sub-distributions in the question headers this year?
Masonic didn't include them because they are not supposed to be read, and including them would make it likely that they would be read. I imagine, but do not specifically know, the IHSA-writing team did so for the same reason.
Jonah Greenthal
National Academic Quiz Tournaments
User avatar
db0wman
Wakka
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 3:37 pm
Location: Champaign, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by db0wman »

I thought that the sectional set was well-written for the most part. One problem that I noticed was that the questions seemed inconsistent in difficulty--some answerlines were far too specific for this level, such as the Checkers speech and the Calvin cycle tossups, while others were too easy, like the bonus on key signatures. An argument could also be made that the set was too easy since so many close games occurred today, but I felt like it was around the right difficulty on average.

Two errors that I can recall were on the Ravel tossup and the Catalan's conjecture bonus. For the former, I believe that it said that he wrote the piece Syrinx, which is actually a piece by Debussy. For the bonus, it asked something along the lines of "what type of numbers does Catalan's conjecture say 9 and 8 are the only examples of whose difference is 1", and my team said "integer powers", but the answer that it was asking for was "powers of prime numbers". Catalan's conjecture refers to powers of natural numbers in general, so I believe this to be an error (although looking back, "integer powers" might not be acceptable).

I'm really looking forward to the state sets, as I've enjoyed both of the ones from regionals and sectionals. Congrats to all the teams who won their sectionals--see you on Friday!
Dylan Bowman
Uni '20; Illinois '23
jzlau2
Lulu
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:05 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by jzlau2 »

It seemed to me that some of the questions had unclear wording as to what the question was asking for. I remember several toss-ups where the wording was confusing, especially regarding the words "the/this/those". Other than that, I thought the set was fairly well-written and the difficulty level was appropriate.
Jonathan Lau
UIUC Laboratory HS 2021
Johns Hopkins 2024
Berniecrat
Tidus
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:54 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Berniecrat »

Hello.

In our Game 3, the moderator couldn't even read one of the social studies questions and had to throw it out. Do you know why this may have been a problem (were there typos or something) or what the actual answer was?
Arjun Nageswaran
Aptakisic '17
Stevenson '21
Harvard '25
User avatar
apk1741
Kimahri
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:58 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by apk1741 »

I think the Sectionals packets were pretty well-written, though wording was a little difficult to understand. And this is probably a dumb question, but do CE and Geo fall under Misc for IHSA? Unfortunately, I will not be able to make it to IHSA State, but I wish good luck to all of you who are going, and hope you have fun!
Govind "Achu" Prabhakar
Aptakisic '16
Stevenson '20
jzlau2
Lulu
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:05 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by jzlau2 »

Our moderator at the East Central Illinois sectional stumbled a couple of times on questions and forgot to prompt us on a lot of the bonuses. Some of those questions were worded weirdly, or maybe it was just the moderator. I remember one myth question where I didn't buzz because he said "this figure", but then said "the man was torn to pieces by maeneads after failing to retrieve his wife from the underworld" or something like that at the start of a sentence.

Obviously, if he had said "this man", we would have said "Orpheus", but the moderator's slip-up threw us off. Our opponent realized that he read the sentence wrong and buzzed for 10 points. There was another bonus where it was unclear whether they were asking for the title of the Langston Hughes poem "Mother to Son" or the speaker in "Mother to Son".

However, it could have just as easily been a typo, as that was not the only question where the moderator mixed up the definite articles and flustered me a bit. There may have been plenty of typos in the the set, but we will never really know for sure.
Jonathan Lau
UIUC Laboratory HS 2021
Johns Hopkins 2024
jzlau2
Lulu
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:05 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by jzlau2 »

db0wman wrote:I thought that the sectional set was well-written for the most part. One problem that I noticed was that the questions seemed inconsistent in difficulty--some answerlines were far too specific for this level, such as the Checkers speech and the Calvin cycle tossups, while others were too easy, like the bonus on key signatures. An argument could also be made that the set was too easy since so many close games occurred today, but I felt like it was around the right difficulty on average.
I also felt like some of the bonuses were super easy as well. In the last game against Mahomet, it seemed like they ended up with a lot of really easy and straightforward bonuses which they got 30 points on, which is what kept them ahead of us until we finally pulled ahead in question 20. However, our team seemed to end up with quite a few questions that asked for two different things or a specific sort of description which had to be just right for the moderator to accept it. I didn't feel like the Calvin Cycle tossup was "hard" for sectional level, mainly because there was a giveaway clue about the enzyme Rubisco two lines in.
Jonathan Lau
UIUC Laboratory HS 2021
Johns Hopkins 2024
User avatar
Irreligion in Bangladesh
Auron
Posts: 2123
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Winnebago, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Irreligion in Bangladesh »

db0wman wrote:I thought that the sectional set was well-written for the most part. One problem that I noticed was that the questions seemed inconsistent in difficulty--some answerlines were far too specific for this level, such as the Checkers speech and the Calvin cycle tossups, while others were too easy, like the bonus on key signatures. An argument could also be made that the set was too easy since so many close games occurred today, but I felt like it was around the right difficulty on average.

Two errors that I can recall were on the Ravel tossup and the Catalan's conjecture bonus. For the former, I believe that it said that he wrote the piece Syrinx, which is actually a piece by Debussy. For the bonus, it asked something along the lines of "what type of numbers does Catalan's conjecture say 9 and 8 are the only examples of whose difference is 1", and my team said "integer powers", but the answer that it was asking for was "powers of prime numbers". Catalan's conjecture refers to powers of natural numbers in general, so I believe this to be an error (although looking back, "integer powers" might not be acceptable).

I'm really looking forward to the state sets, as I've enjoyed both of the ones from regionals and sectionals. Congrats to all the teams who won their sectionals--see you on Friday!
A lot of good theory stuff to unpack here - please don't interpret the fact that I'm about to argue with everything you said as an indication I disagree completely. :)

*Checkers speech and Calvin cycle are both within range of a regular difficulty set of tossups; in the Big 3 categories, I'd say that they're definitely no harder than O! Pioneers, Yellow Wallpaper, and the Homestead Act, to name the three tossups I was most worried about. I'm a big proponent of keeping a balanced range on tossup answers - if the answer can never be as hard as O! Pioneers, for example, you can just buzz with My Antonia the moment things sound too Nebraskan.

*The key signature bonus relied a bit (a bit too much?) on "music theory is naturally harder than most quizbowl music" as well as a dose of "I'm asking for a descriptive answer in the hard part," which always depresses conversion a bit more. In my room - not that "anecdote" is the singular form of "data" - a group of kids who I know have good musical knowledge weren't able to figure out what part 2 was asking for. I'm very interested to see the conversion data on this one - it's one of those quizbowl hunches that I'll finally have some hard data to justify/reject it with.

*Close games are going to be a part of good quizbowl, no matter what; my hope is that things weren't close just because teams were trading buzzer races on leadins (or second clues after an impossible leadin) and sweeping every bonus. I don't have tossup buzzpoint data, but the bonus conversion data that I'm seeing so far has some surprising "they should have gotten that right" in several places in the close, Sectional-deciding games.

*The Ravel tossup led in with "A work by this composer ends with tambourine-playing girls dancing a bacchanale after the title characters re-enact the story of Pan and Syrinx.", describing Daphnis et Chloe. Noah will address the Catalan conjecture part, but you're essentially right about that one.
Brad Fischer
Head Editor, IHSA State Series
IHSSBCA Chair

Winnebago HS ('06)
Northern Illinois University ('10)
Assistant Coach, IMSA (2010-12)
Coach, Keith Country Day School (2012-16)
User avatar
Irreligion in Bangladesh
Auron
Posts: 2123
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Winnebago, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Irreligion in Bangladesh »

jzlau2 wrote:It seemed to me that some of the questions had unclear wording as to what the question was asking for. I remember several toss-ups where the wording was confusing, especially regarding the words "the/this/those". Other than that, I thought the set was fairly well-written and the difficulty level was appropriate.
Do you remember what sort of questions had this? I can look it up to see what sort of phrasing is causing that, and see if it's replicated in the State set before it goes to the printers tomorrow.
Brad Fischer
Head Editor, IHSA State Series
IHSSBCA Chair

Winnebago HS ('06)
Northern Illinois University ('10)
Assistant Coach, IMSA (2010-12)
Coach, Keith Country Day School (2012-16)
User avatar
Irreligion in Bangladesh
Auron
Posts: 2123
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Winnebago, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Irreligion in Bangladesh »

Berniecrat wrote:Hello.

In our Game 3, the moderator couldn't even read one of the social studies questions and had to throw it out. Do you know why this may have been a problem (were there typos or something) or what the actual answer was?
I talked with Arjun via PM about this, and we figured out it was the Round 6 tossup on the Hamilton-Burr duel; there was one missing letter in that question, but the fix for that went out on Friday to Sectional managers, and should have been edited in the pre-meeting. Not sure what could have gone wrong there.
Brad Fischer
Head Editor, IHSA State Series
IHSSBCA Chair

Winnebago HS ('06)
Northern Illinois University ('10)
Assistant Coach, IMSA (2010-12)
Coach, Keith Country Day School (2012-16)
User avatar
Bosa of York
Rikku
Posts: 362
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 9:16 am

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Bosa of York »

Irreligion in Bangladesh wrote: *Checkers speech [is] within range of a regular difficulty set of tossups [and is] definitely no harder than [...] the Homestead Act
I'd disagree with this (but probably not with the Calvin Cycle). As far as I can tell, the Checkers Speech has been a tossup answerline six times--once at NASAT and three times at History Bowl Nationals, once at ACF Nationals, and once at CO History--all tournaments that should be above regular difficulty. It's been asked for in bonuses at several high-school regular tournaments, but typically as a hard part. Moreover, while I can't comment on Illinois's US History curriculum, I'd guess that very few US History classes talk about either the 1952 election or Nixon's pre-presidential career in any significant length, while I know that my own classes talked about the Homestead Act a decent bit because of its importance for the settling of the west. The Checkers Speech might be more "quizbowl famous" than the Homestead Act, but the latter is definitely more important and probably better known.
Eric Wolfsberg
Bethlehem Central High School 2016
University of Delaware 2020
Stanford 2025 or whatever
jzlau2
Lulu
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:05 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by jzlau2 »

apk1741 wrote:I think the Sectionals packets were pretty well-written, though wording was a little difficult to understand. And this is probably a dumb question, but do CE and Geo fall under Misc for IHSA? Unfortunately, I will not be able to make it to IHSA State, but I wish good luck to all of you who are going, and hope you have fun!
Most Geo was under Social Studies, but there was one question about Lake Victoria in the last round of Sectionals that was placed under "Miscellaneous". That was the only Geography in the whole packet, which is strange, because I thought at least one of the questions in SS is Geography. I think that CE is under Miscellaneous, but I think that Trash is under Misc as well.
Jonathan Lau
UIUC Laboratory HS 2021
Johns Hopkins 2024
User avatar
Dominator
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Dominator »

db0wman wrote:For the bonus, it asked something along the lines of "what type of numbers does Catalan's conjecture say 9 and 8 are the only examples of whose difference is 1", and my team said "integer powers", but the answer that it was asking for was "powers of prime numbers". Catalan's conjecture refers to powers of natural numbers in general, so I believe this to be an error (although looking back, "integer powers" might not be acceptable).
I apologize for that one. You're right that as asked, the best answer is "integer power" or some equivalent thereof. I can't speak to the intent since I don't have any particular memory of writing that question, but it feels to me like I only half-edited it - no matter what the answer was, I'd have preferred another clue and the answer line should have given more instruction to the moderator. I can only hope it didn't swing any matches.
Dr. Noah Prince

Normal Community High School (2002)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004, 2007, 2008)

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy - Scholastic Bowl coach (2009-2014), assistant coach (2014-2015), well wisher (2015-2016)
guy in San Diego (2016-present)
President of Qblitz (2018-present)

Image
User avatar
Dominator
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Dominator »

jzlau2 wrote:
apk1741 wrote:I think the Sectionals packets were pretty well-written, though wording was a little difficult to understand. And this is probably a dumb question, but do CE and Geo fall under Misc for IHSA? Unfortunately, I will not be able to make it to IHSA State, but I wish good luck to all of you who are going, and hope you have fun!
Most Geo was under Social Studies, but there was one question about Lake Victoria in the last round of Sectionals that was placed under "Miscellaneous". That was the only Geography in the whole packet, which is strange, because I thought at least one of the questions in SS is Geography. I think that CE is under Miscellaneous, but I think that Trash is under Misc as well.
Miscellaneous includes "Interdiscplinary", which is what I'm guessing was happening here.
Dr. Noah Prince

Normal Community High School (2002)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004, 2007, 2008)

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy - Scholastic Bowl coach (2009-2014), assistant coach (2014-2015), well wisher (2015-2016)
guy in San Diego (2016-present)
President of Qblitz (2018-present)

Image
User avatar
the return of AHAN
Auron
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:40 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by the return of AHAN »

Any complaints people have with the distribution should be directed at the people who have a say in the distribution, that is, the IHSA Advisory Committee members. The writing team is just following the prescribed distribution. Also, anyone who thinks the questions were anything other than a quantum leap forward is obviously new here.
Jeff Price
Barrington High School Coach (2021 & 2023 HSNCT Champions, 2023 PACE Champions, 2023 Illinois Masonic Bowl Class 3A State Champions)
Barrington Station Middle School Coach (2013 MSNCT Champions, 2013 & 2017 Illinois Class AA State Champions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hokie168
Lulu
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:20 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by hokie168 »

I was looking at the state tournament schedule at http://www.ihsa.org/data/scores/scb28r16.htm and was wondering if anyone knew how IHSA splits teams into pools. Is it seeded, random draw, geographic, or what?
Dennis Loo
Former coach at TJ and IMSA
Former player at UVA and Virginia Tech
User avatar
Dominator
Tidus
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Dominator »

hokie168 wrote:I was looking at the state tournament schedule at http://www.ihsa.org/data/scores/scb28r16.htm and was wondering if anyone knew how IHSA splits teams into pools. Is it seeded, random draw, geographic, or what?
It's my understanding that pooling is random. Having the two best teams have to play for one spot in the finals is not uncommon.
Dr. Noah Prince

Normal Community High School (2002)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2004, 2007, 2008)

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy - Scholastic Bowl coach (2009-2014), assistant coach (2014-2015), well wisher (2015-2016)
guy in San Diego (2016-present)
President of Qblitz (2018-present)

Image
User avatar
the return of AHAN
Auron
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:40 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by the return of AHAN »

Dominator wrote:
hokie168 wrote:I was looking at the state tournament schedule at http://www.ihsa.org/data/scores/scb28r16.htm and was wondering if anyone knew how IHSA splits teams into pools. Is it seeded, random draw, geographic, or what?
It's my understanding that pooling is random. Having the two best teams have to play for one spot in the finals is not uncommon.
100% this. In my two terms on the IESA Advisory Committee, it was as uncomplicated as rolling peas labeled A through H (with sectionals labeled roughly northeast to southwest, A through H) out of a bottle at the annual meeting 11 months prior to the next state finals, with members taking turns rolling out the peas, and the first four formed Class A, pool A, and what remained formed pool B. Repeat the process for Class AA. Now to be sure, the exact boundaries aren't known at that time, but there's very little wiggle room to make big changes.
IMSA getting drawn in with Uni Lab and Stevenson is a tough break, for sure, never mind Macomb. Some pretty good teams in that pool are going home empty-handed, which is too bad. On the other hand, at least one of Latin, Sandburg, and Mater Dei will get some sort of fat trophy and should be appropriately feted when they return home.
Jeff Price
Barrington High School Coach (2021 & 2023 HSNCT Champions, 2023 PACE Champions, 2023 Illinois Masonic Bowl Class 3A State Champions)
Barrington Station Middle School Coach (2013 MSNCT Champions, 2013 & 2017 Illinois Class AA State Champions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jzlau2
Lulu
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:05 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by jzlau2 »

Hello,

Does anyone know when All-State Teams will be released? I don't think I will make it, but I am just curious to see if my teammates make it.
Jonathan Lau
UIUC Laboratory HS 2021
Johns Hopkins 2024
User avatar
the return of AHAN
Auron
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:40 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by the return of AHAN »

Usually in April, if I recall correctly.
Jeff Price
Barrington High School Coach (2021 & 2023 HSNCT Champions, 2023 PACE Champions, 2023 Illinois Masonic Bowl Class 3A State Champions)
Barrington Station Middle School Coach (2013 MSNCT Champions, 2013 & 2017 Illinois Class AA State Champions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
mhasquin
Wakka
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:09 pm
Location: Piasa, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by mhasquin »

jzlau2 wrote:Hello,

Does anyone know when All-State Teams will be released? I don't think I will make it, but I am just curious to see if my teammates make it.
Ballots are due today at noon. I believe the goal is to release the teams on Friday morning.
Matt Hasquin
Scholastic Bowl Coach - Southwestern High School - Piasa, Illinois
IHSSBCA Chair (2018-2022)
User avatar
mhasquin
Wakka
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:09 pm
Location: Piasa, Illinois
Contact:

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by mhasquin »

Submission of ballots has been extended into Monday. Efforts from the IHSA state finals can be used by the voters.
Matt Hasquin
Scholastic Bowl Coach - Southwestern High School - Piasa, Illinois
IHSSBCA Chair (2018-2022)
User avatar
the return of AHAN
Auron
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:40 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by the return of AHAN »

Seeing the names associated with top tier teams in Illinois in 2018 got me feeling nostalgic...
http://www.hsquizbowl.org/db/tournament ... standings/
http://www.hsquizbowl.org/db/tournament ... standings/

See any names you recognize?
Jeff Price
Barrington High School Coach (2021 & 2023 HSNCT Champions, 2023 PACE Champions, 2023 Illinois Masonic Bowl Class 3A State Champions)
Barrington Station Middle School Coach (2013 MSNCT Champions, 2013 & 2017 Illinois Class AA State Champions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
AGoodMan
Rikku
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:25 pm

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by AGoodMan »

Out of sheer curiosity, would stats from this year's sectionals and state be posted anywhere?
Jon Suh
Wheaton Warrenville South High School '16
Harvard '20
User avatar
Good Goblin Housekeeping
Auron
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 10:03 am

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Good Goblin Housekeeping »

AGoodMan wrote:Out of sheer curiosity, would stats from this year's sectionals and state be posted anywhere?
beyond the ihsa scorezone?
Andrew Wang
Illinois 2016
User avatar
Irreligion in Bangladesh
Auron
Posts: 2123
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Winnebago, IL

Re: Illinois '17-'18

Post by Irreligion in Bangladesh »

AGoodMan wrote:Out of sheer curiosity, would stats from this year's sectionals and state be posted anywhere?
I don't have all the sectional stats in (and there's a chance I won't ever get some of them) but various stats will eventually be collected and posted. It will be a while before it's done; I'm busy with NHBB Nats for the next few weeks, and the stats we collect aren't going to just be SQBS - it's the part-by-part bonus conversion data along with it - so it'll take a while on its own.
Brad Fischer
Head Editor, IHSA State Series
IHSSBCA Chair

Winnebago HS ('06)
Northern Illinois University ('10)
Assistant Coach, IMSA (2010-12)
Coach, Keith Country Day School (2012-16)
Locked