2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
- Important Bird Area
- Forums Staff: Administrator
- Posts: 6136
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
- Contact:
2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
This is your discussion thread for specific questions from the 2018 Division II ICT and IPNCT.
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF
"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF
"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
- Gene Harrogate
- Wakka
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 11:05 pm
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
I'd like to vent my frustration about two instances. In the first, when I buzzed in with "Assyrian Empire" the moderator negged me and insisted that I had answered "Uh... Syrian Empire". I was flabbergasted that I wasn't even asked to repeat my answer, considering the closeness of the moderator's interpretation to the correct answer as well as the general expectation that a collegiate quizbowler would know there was no "Syrian Empire" in ancient Mesopotamia. When I protested after the other team had picked up the tossup, 3 of them insisted that they had heard me say "Uh... Syrian". This came across as unsportsmanlike to me (I won't name the team), as this insistence seemed to me and my teammates completely unfounded. It was especially frustrating since one member of the opposing team told me afterwards he sympathized with me and thought I had given the correct answer. I know if I was on the other team I would have (and have in similar situations) given the benefit of the doubt.
The other instance was a just a plain moderator mistake. My teammate answered "If This is a Man" for "Survival in Auschwitz" and was negged, despite the fact that (I believe) his answer was on the list of acceptable answerlines. Unfortunately neither of us had the wherewithal to challenge at that time and only found out the mistake after the fact.
Excuse me if this comes across as petulant, I realize that no single tossup really costs a team the game, and we had other opportunities to win that we didn't capitalize on. I also realize everyone makes mistakes, especially when doing grueling work for hours, unpaid. The two games were decided by 70 and 30 points respectively, however, and the first loss in particular cost us a spot in the top bracket without a tiebreaker. It's especially a shame given the amount of money and effort teams put into attending ICT, and the emotional stakes involved.
The other instance was a just a plain moderator mistake. My teammate answered "If This is a Man" for "Survival in Auschwitz" and was negged, despite the fact that (I believe) his answer was on the list of acceptable answerlines. Unfortunately neither of us had the wherewithal to challenge at that time and only found out the mistake after the fact.
Excuse me if this comes across as petulant, I realize that no single tossup really costs a team the game, and we had other opportunities to win that we didn't capitalize on. I also realize everyone makes mistakes, especially when doing grueling work for hours, unpaid. The two games were decided by 70 and 30 points respectively, however, and the first loss in particular cost us a spot in the top bracket without a tiebreaker. It's especially a shame given the amount of money and effort teams put into attending ICT, and the emotional stakes involved.
Henry Atkins
ex-McGill
ex-McGill
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
I guess this was supposed to be the hard part (with DNA ligase and topoisomerases being easy and medium, respectively) but I thought that this was fairly unreasonable. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but to my knowledge nothing in this question was uniquely identifying except the recognition sequence. There are numerous common restriction enzymes which leave sticky ends so you would just have to pull a specific restriction enzyme from memorizing a pretty unremarkable 6-nucleotide sequence.Pack 7 bonus 22 wrote: Common restriction enzymes used in cloning include this one, which cuts at a GAATTC recognition sequence and leaves a 5' sticky end.
answer: EcoRI
Raymond Chen
McMaster University, 2017
University of Toronto, 202x
McMaster University, 2017
University of Toronto, 202x
- Good Goblin Housekeeping
- Auron
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 10:03 am
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
isn't this like... the most famous restriction enzyme that produces sticky endsProtean wrote:I guess this was supposed to be the hard part (with DNA ligase and topoisomerases being easy and medium, respectively) but I thought that this was fairly unreasonable. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but to my knowledge nothing in this question was uniquely identifying except the recognition sequence. There are numerous common restriction enzymes which leave sticky ends so you would just have to pull a specific restriction enzyme from memorizing a pretty unremarkable 6-nucleotide sequence.Pack 7 bonus 22 wrote: Common restriction enzymes used in cloning include this one, which cuts at a GAATTC recognition sequence and leaves a 5' sticky end.
answer: EcoRI
Andrew Wang
Illinois 2016
Illinois 2016
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
I mean, if the question is written in a way where the only way you're answering is "I'll just name the most famous restriction enzyme" instead of any actual clues, that question may need to be reworked a bit. I say the sequence is unremarkable because there's nothing about GAATTC that makes it any more notable than any other restriction enzyme sequence and in practice many other sticky end-generating enzymes are used just as commonly as EcoRI.Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode wrote:isn't this like... the most famous restriction enzyme that produces sticky endsProtean wrote:I guess this was supposed to be the hard part (with DNA ligase and topoisomerases being easy and medium, respectively) but I thought that this was fairly unreasonable. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but to my knowledge nothing in this question was uniquely identifying except the recognition sequence. There are numerous common restriction enzymes which leave sticky ends so you would just have to pull a specific restriction enzyme from memorizing a pretty unremarkable 6-nucleotide sequence.Pack 7 bonus 22 wrote: Common restriction enzymes used in cloning include this one, which cuts at a GAATTC recognition sequence and leaves a 5' sticky end.
answer: EcoRI
Raymond Chen
McMaster University, 2017
University of Toronto, 202x
McMaster University, 2017
University of Toronto, 202x
- Dirty Water
- Lulu
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Ridgewood, New Jersey
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
I said "slaves in Egypt" for _pyramid builders_ and got negged; I understand not all of the builders may have been slaves per se, but what were the acceptable and promptable responses?
David Song
Princeton '21
Bergen County Academies '17
Ben Franklin MS, Ridgewood HS 2011-13
Princeton '21
Bergen County Academies '17
Ben Franklin MS, Ridgewood HS 2011-13
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
EcoRI is by far the most commonly used example of a restriction enzyme in high school and intro collegiate biology classes. While I get that philosophically, the question isn't super interesting to listen to, pragmatically, I don't see a problem here. Most people who have taken a biology class and have the quizbowl skill needed to qualify for ICT should be able to figure out what the question wants, even if they haven't memorized the recognition sequence.Protean wrote:I mean, if the question is written in a way where the only way you're answering is "I'll just name the most famous restriction enzyme" instead of any actual clues, that question may need to be reworked a bit. I say the sequence is unremarkable because there's nothing about GAATTC that makes it any more notable than any other restriction enzyme sequence and in practice many other sticky end-generating enzymes are used just as commonly as EcoRI.Banned Tiny Toon Adventures Episode wrote:isn't this like... the most famous restriction enzyme that produces sticky endsProtean wrote:I guess this was supposed to be the hard part (with DNA ligase and topoisomerases being easy and medium, respectively) but I thought that this was fairly unreasonable. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but to my knowledge nothing in this question was uniquely identifying except the recognition sequence. There are numerous common restriction enzymes which leave sticky ends so you would just have to pull a specific restriction enzyme from memorizing a pretty unremarkable 6-nucleotide sequence.Pack 7 bonus 22 wrote: Common restriction enzymes used in cloning include this one, which cuts at a GAATTC recognition sequence and leaves a 5' sticky end.
answer: EcoRI
Billy Busse
University of Illinois, B.S. '14
Rosalind Franklin University, M.S. '21, M.D. Candidate '25
Emeritus Member, ACF
Writer/Subject Editor/Set Editor, NAQT
University of Illinois, B.S. '14
Rosalind Franklin University, M.S. '21, M.D. Candidate '25
Emeritus Member, ACF
Writer/Subject Editor/Set Editor, NAQT
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
The answer line wasLarge Adult Song wrote:I said "slaves in Egypt" for _pyramid builders_ and got negged; I understand not all of the builders may have been slaves per se, but what were the acceptable and promptable responses?
pyramid builders (accept answers that mention people who worked on pyramids at Giza)
I guess we should have included specific instructions on what to do with answers involving "slave(s)." Since you just said "slaves in Egypt" but nothing about "working on pyramids," I'm not sure if you would have earned points on a protest. (For instance, it's presumably not the case that all slaves in Egypt lived in homes separated from a sacred area by the Wall of the Crow.)
-Seth
Seth Teitler
Formerly UC Berkeley and U. Chicago
President of NAQT
Emeritus member of ACF
Formerly UC Berkeley and U. Chicago
President of NAQT
Emeritus member of ACF
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
The modern understanding is that the pyramids were built by farmers, not slaves as the old myth goes. I answered with "Egyptian farmers" because that's who actually build the pyramids, and "pyramid builders" is not really a group of people by most definitions.setht wrote:The answer line wasLarge Adult Song wrote:I said "slaves in Egypt" for _pyramid builders_ and got negged; I understand not all of the builders may have been slaves per se, but what were the acceptable and promptable responses?
pyramid builders (accept answers that mention people who worked on pyramids at Giza)
I guess we should have included specific instructions on what to do with answers involving "slave(s)." Since you just said "slaves in Egypt" but nothing about "working on pyramids," I'm not sure if you would have earned points on a protest. (For instance, it's presumably not the case that all slaves in Egypt lived in homes separated from a sacred area by the Wall of the Crow.)
Perhaps the answerline should have been "building pyramids" and instead of asking for a group, you ask for a task.
Erik Christensen
University of Waterloo - School of Planning Class of '18
Defending VETO top scorer
University of Waterloo - School of Planning Class of '18
Defending VETO top scorer
- Maxwell Sniffingwell
- Auron
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 3:22 pm
- Location: Des Moines, IA
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
Yeah, I got negged for "the slaves that built the pyramids" on this.setht wrote:The answer line wasLarge Adult Song wrote:I said "slaves in Egypt" for _pyramid builders_ and got negged; I understand not all of the builders may have been slaves per se, but what were the acceptable and promptable responses?
pyramid builders (accept answers that mention people who worked on pyramids at Giza)
I guess we should have included specific instructions on what to do with answers involving "slave(s)." Since you just said "slaves in Egypt" but nothing about "working on pyramids," I'm not sure if you would have earned points on a protest. (For instance, it's presumably not the case that all slaves in Egypt lived in homes separated from a sacred area by the Wall of the Crow.)
-Seth
Last edited by Maxwell Sniffingwell on Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Greg Peterson
Northwestern University '18
Lawrence University '11
Maine South HS '07
"a decent player" - Mike Cheyne
Northwestern University '18
Lawrence University '11
Maine South HS '07
"a decent player" - Mike Cheyne
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
Was the DI version different? Chris Ray got prompted from "slaves" to "egyptian slaves" to pyramid builders on this?cornfused wrote:Yeah, I got negged for "the slaves that built the pyramids"setht wrote:The answer line wasLarge Adult Song wrote:I said "slaves in Egypt" for _pyramid builders_ and got negged; I understand not all of the builders may have been slaves per se, but what were the acceptable and promptable responses?
pyramid builders (accept answers that mention people who worked on pyramids at Giza)
I guess we should have included specific instructions on what to do with answers involving "slave(s)." Since you just said "slaves in Egypt" but nothing about "working on pyramids," I'm not sure if you would have earned points on a protest. (For instance, it's presumably not the case that all slaves in Egypt lived in homes separated from a sacred area by the Wall of the Crow.)
-Seth
on this.
Jacob R., ex-Chicago
- Youngster Joey
- Lulu
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:36 am
- Location: Route 30, Johto
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
May I see the tossup on "etching"? I buzzed in with "photolithography" after hearing a description of photoresist removal, which I think is at least promptable. Also, may I see the FRET bonus?
Walter Zhao
Torrey Pines '16
Johns Hopkins '19
UCSF '20
CWRU
"Remember my super cool Rattata? My Rattata is different from regular Rattata. It’s like my Rattata is in the top percentage of all Rattata."
Torrey Pines '16
Johns Hopkins '19
UCSF '20
CWRU
"Remember my super cool Rattata? My Rattata is different from regular Rattata. It’s like my Rattata is in the top percentage of all Rattata."
- Important Bird Area
- Forums Staff: Administrator
- Posts: 6136
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 3:33 pm
- Location: San Francisco Bay Area
- Contact:
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
We ruled that photolithography was not acceptable or promptable for this tossup.2018 DII ICT round 5 wrote:This process alternates with passivation steps in the Bosch process. High selectivities can be achieved by the "reactive ion" form of this technique, which removes layers of photoresist and oxide from silicon wafers. Its "wet" form uses chemicals like (*) hydrofluoric acid to make patterns in a substrate. For 10 points—name this technique classically used in printmaking to create designs in metal plates by means of corrosion.
answer: etching (accept (deep) reactive ion etching or wet etching; prompt on "(deep) RIE")
2018 DII ICT round 2 wrote:This mechanism's efficiency scales with the negative sixth power of the distance between acceptor and donor molecules. For 10 points each—
A. Name this fluorescent process discovered by Theodor Forster.
answer: FRET ["fret"] (or Forster resonance energy transfer or fluorescence resonance energy transfer)
B. Common fluorophores used for FRET are variants of this protein first isolated from the A. victoria jellyfish. Its name refers to its emission of light at a wavelength of about 509 nanometers.
answer: green fluorescent protein or GFP
C. Instead of employing fluorescent proteins, a bioluminescent variant of FRET called BRET uses this class of enzymes found in fireflies as a source of photons.
answer: luciferase(s)
Jeff Hoppes
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF
"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
President, Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance
former HSQB Chief Admin (2012-13)
VP for Communication and history subject editor, NAQT
Editor emeritus, ACF
"I wish to make some kind of joke about Jeff's love of birds, but I always fear he'll turn them on me Hitchcock-style." -Fred
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
The DI version had the same answer line. (Well, I guess the parenthetical directive said "answers indicating" rather than "answers that mention," but that's the only difference.)vinteuil wrote:Was the DI version different? Chris Ray got prompted from "slaves" to "egyptian slaves" to pyramid builders on this?cornfused wrote:Yeah, I got negged for "the slaves that built the pyramids"setht wrote:The answer line wasLarge Adult Song wrote:I said "slaves in Egypt" for _pyramid builders_ and got negged; I understand not all of the builders may have been slaves per se, but what were the acceptable and promptable responses?
pyramid builders (accept answers that mention people who worked on pyramids at Giza)
I guess we should have included specific instructions on what to do with answers involving "slave(s)." Since you just said "slaves in Egypt" but nothing about "working on pyramids," I'm not sure if you would have earned points on a protest. (For instance, it's presumably not the case that all slaves in Egypt lived in homes separated from a sacred area by the Wall of the Crow.)
-Seth
on this.
-Seth
Seth Teitler
Formerly UC Berkeley and U. Chicago
President of NAQT
Emeritus member of ACF
Formerly UC Berkeley and U. Chicago
President of NAQT
Emeritus member of ACF
Re: 2018 Division II ICT: specific question discussion
I wasn't moderating for Chris this round, but I read the parenthetical directive as indicating that "pyramid builders" isn't a specific Named Group, and thus reasonable descriptors (like "slaves" or "Egyptian slaves") would thus be promptable (and I did give out those prompts when the tossup was answered that way in my room). I'm guessing Chris's moderator for that round felt the same way.setht wrote:The DI version had the same answer line. (Well, I guess the parenthetical directive said "answers indicating" rather than "answers that mention," but that's the only difference.)vinteuil wrote:Was the DI version different? Chris Ray got prompted from "slaves" to "egyptian slaves" to pyramid builders on this?cornfused wrote:Yeah, I got negged for "the slaves that built the pyramids"setht wrote:The answer line wasLarge Adult Song wrote:I said "slaves in Egypt" for _pyramid builders_ and got negged; I understand not all of the builders may have been slaves per se, but what were the acceptable and promptable responses?
pyramid builders (accept answers that mention people who worked on pyramids at Giza)
I guess we should have included specific instructions on what to do with answers involving "slave(s)." Since you just said "slaves in Egypt" but nothing about "working on pyramids," I'm not sure if you would have earned points on a protest. (For instance, it's presumably not the case that all slaves in Egypt lived in homes separated from a sacred area by the Wall of the Crow.)
-Seth
on this.
-Seth
Billy Busse
University of Illinois, B.S. '14
Rosalind Franklin University, M.S. '21, M.D. Candidate '25
Emeritus Member, ACF
Writer/Subject Editor/Set Editor, NAQT
University of Illinois, B.S. '14
Rosalind Franklin University, M.S. '21, M.D. Candidate '25
Emeritus Member, ACF
Writer/Subject Editor/Set Editor, NAQT