Prison Bowl III discussion

Dormant threads from the high school sections are preserved here.
Locked
lchen
Wakka
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Hunter, NYC
Contact:

Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by lchen »

Thank you to my teammates and everyone else who helped produce this set, and thanks to all the teams who hosted mirrors! The Prison Bowl set will be posted on quizbowlpackets.com. We'd love to hear your thoughts about the set and any suggestions for improvement.
Lily Chen
Hunter '12, MIT '16

User avatar
Frater Taciturnus
Auron
Posts: 2463
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:26 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Frater Taciturnus »

lchen wrote:Thank you to my teammates and everyone else who helped produce this set, and thanks to all the teams who hosted mirrors! The Prison Bowl set will be posted on quizbowlpackets.com. We'd love to hear your thoughts about the set and any suggestions for improvement.
http://quizbowlpackets.com/archive/2010Hunter/ for packets. add a .zip to the end for the zip file.
George Berry
[email protected]
--------------
J. Sargeant Reynolds CC 2008, 2009, 2014
Virginia Commonwealth 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013,
Douglas Freeman 2005, 2006, 2007

SoLegit12
Wakka
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by SoLegit12 »

Why the decision to go shorter?
Nick "Nick" Neuteufel
Criticizing your philosophy and social science writing since 2010.
***
duPont Manual HS '12
UNC Chapel Hill '16 (VP of the Carlolina Academic Team)
[email protected]

lchen
Wakka
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Hunter, NYC
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by lchen »

SoLegit12 wrote:Why the decision to go shorter?
Isn't 5-6 lines per tossup pretty standard? Last year people thought the questions were too long and dragged on, so we made a conscious effort to trim out unnecessary verbiage and clues that were useless or too hard.
Lily Chen
Hunter '12, MIT '16

User avatar
Mechanical Beasts
Banned Cheater
Posts: 5673
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:50 pm

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Mechanical Beasts »

lchen wrote:
SoLegit12 wrote:Why the decision to go shorter?
Isn't 5-6 lines per tossup pretty standard? Last year people thought the questions were too long and dragged on, so we made a conscious effort to trim out unnecessary verbiage and clues that were useless or too hard.
Yeah; the best explanation here for "why the decision to go shorter" would inevitably be "it makes the questions play better for the target audience of the tournament."
Andrew Watkins

User avatar
Down and out in Quintana Roo
Auron
Posts: 2907
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:25 am
Location: Camden, DE
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Down and out in Quintana Roo »

In round 6, there was a bonus on Canadian geography that said that "this river" flows northwest and some other things (don't feel like looking it up), then the answer was the St. Lawrence. TJ protested since they messed it up (from that wrong clue) and it almost mattered in the game they played against CR.

EDIT: fixed the round number

EDIT: Okay fine here it is:
[10] This large North American river mainly drains the Great Lakes Basin and snakes northwest through the US and Canada.
ANSWER: St. Lawrence River
Mr. Andrew Chrzanowski
Caesar Rodney High School
Camden, Delaware
CRHS '97-'01
University of Delaware '01-'05
CRHS quizbowl coach '06-'12
http://crquizbowl.edublogs.org

lchen
Wakka
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Hunter, NYC
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by lchen »

Ah, okay. Thanks for pointing that out. I'm really sorry for all the factual errors!
Lily Chen
Hunter '12, MIT '16

User avatar
kayli
Auron
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by kayli »

I'm reading this right now, and overall I really like this set. The only issue I have is that some of the bonus parts don't have clear easy-medium-hard progressions, and some bonuses fluctuate a lot in their difficulty. This didn't happen too much from what I can see. Excellent work!
Kay, Chicago.

nadph
Rikku
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:21 pm

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by nadph »

Is it standard practice to use Leon Foucault (Foucault's Pendulum) as a giveaway for Michel Foucault? I haven't seen it done before...
Nikhil Desai
Bellarmine College Prep '12
Stanford '12-'15, '18

centralhs
Wakka
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:11 pm

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by centralhs »

The last line of the question reads "Name this French author of Discipline and Punish, who has a namesake pendulum." The phrase "namesake pendulum" would certainly tip most high school students off to the answer of "Foucault", but it implies that the pendulum is named after the author of Discipline and Punish which it isn't.

This is a sloppy attempt at a giveaway, in my opinion, but it is the only such problem that I noticed in an otherwise superb set.
Cathy Hirsch
Chamblee Middle School (2013-present)
Central Gwinnett High School (1997-2012)

User avatar
Down and out in Quintana Roo
Auron
Posts: 2907
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:25 am
Location: Camden, DE
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Down and out in Quintana Roo »

To be honest, i think someone like Foucault (who is incredibly important to the field of sociology, criminology, and the theory of justice as well) is just a little too hard to toss up on a so-called "regular" set. Yeah he's someone you should know if you study those fields, but it's a name that i never heard of until my third year of college when i had to read Discipline and Punish for a Poly Sci class. Now i do know how significant he is at this point and i've been able to tell my kids just as much, but it's something most high schoolers just don't know. He's a lot safer to leave as a bonus answer, or as a harder tossup answer in a finals or nationals packet. Having, as Cathy said, a "sloppy" giveaway just makes that more clear. If you have to construct a mostly-wrong or off-topic giveaway about someone, then that's a good clue that he/she shouldn't be a tossup answer, if we really are shooting for high tossup conversion.

The same goes for those history tossups (and this was not a problem in this set but i see it elsewhere more often) about a country that just throw the capital out there at the end of the question in hopes that teams pick it up there, which nothing else in the question was about political geography at all.
Mr. Andrew Chrzanowski
Caesar Rodney High School
Camden, Delaware
CRHS '97-'01
University of Delaware '01-'05
CRHS quizbowl coach '06-'12
http://crquizbowl.edublogs.org

User avatar
Down and out in Quintana Roo
Auron
Posts: 2907
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:25 am
Location: Camden, DE
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Down and out in Quintana Roo »

A positive remark i wanted to also make about this set was the simplicity, brevity, and clarity of the bonus clues/questions. Recently, i know there's been an effort to include boatloads of clues for the bonuses, and that's fine i guess, but sometimes it's just off the charts. I really liked that a lot of bonus questions in this set just simply started off with, for example, "Answer the following about Argentinian literature, for 10 points each." Perfect. I don't need two sentences about Borges, then another long sentence of clues before it finally asks you to give his name. Just get to the important stuff. This set did that, it made rounds so incredibly quickly, and it made teams and moderators happy.
Mr. Andrew Chrzanowski
Caesar Rodney High School
Camden, Delaware
CRHS '97-'01
University of Delaware '01-'05
CRHS quizbowl coach '06-'12
http://crquizbowl.edublogs.org

lchen
Wakka
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Hunter, NYC
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by lchen »

nadph wrote:Is it standard practice to use Leon Foucault (Foucault's Pendulum) as a giveaway for Michel Foucault? I haven't seen it done before...
Whoops, it must have slipped my mind that they were two different people... :oops:
But yeah, I agree that it wasn't too great of a giveaway and probably shouldn't have been written for this set. It was originally written for the second finals packet, then moved to the first finals packet before the last mirror. I don't think it was played at any of the mirrors, so thankfully no one was tripped up by that.
Lily Chen
Hunter '12, MIT '16

Charbroil
Auron
Posts: 1145
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 11:52 am
Location: St. Charles, MO

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Charbroil »

We've been using this set for moderator practice, and I second the comments about bonus variability. On the other hand, the tossups are really well done--they do a good job of being reasonably difficult questions on easy answers.

Incidentally, the Mohammed bonus in the second packet contains a factual error--the trip to Medina occurred in 622, not 662 as asserted in the packet.
Charles Hang
Francis Howell Central '09
St. Charles Community College '14
Washington University in St. Louis '19 (President, 2017-19)

Owner, Olympia Academic Competition Questions, LLC
Question Writer, National Academic Quiz Tournaments, LLC and National History Bee and Bowl

User avatar
ryandillon
Wakka
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:47 am
Location: Detroit

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by ryandillon »

Just would like to say thanks for the shout out to my main man Heinrich Boll.

Awesome set btw.
Ryan Dillon

Detroit Catholic Central Class of 2011
University of Michigan Class of 2015

User avatar
Rompimientos del Centauro
Lulu
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:22 pm
Location: NY

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Rompimientos del Centauro »

ryandillon wrote:Just would like to say thanks for the shout out to my main man Heinrich Boll.
In retrospect that tossup probably did not belong in a regular difficulty set and should have been put in the finals.
York Chen
Hunter '12
Vassar '16

User avatar
at your pleasure
Auron
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:56 pm

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by at your pleasure »

I think it was in the finals. I definitely rember it coming up in the finals at VCU.
Douglas Graebner, Walt Whitman HS 10, Uchicago 14
"... imagination acts upon man as really as does gravitation, and may kill him as certainly as a dose of prussic acid."-Sir James Frazer,The Golden Bough

http://avorticistking.wordpress.com/

User avatar
Twelve Doors of Mali
Lulu
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:17 pm
Location: TJHSST, Alexandria, VA

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Twelve Doors of Mali »

I think it was in the finals. I definitely rember it coming up in the finals at VCU.
At the VCU mirror, the finals were Round 10. There are 14 packets in the set, though.
Siddharth Hariharan
TJ '11, UVA '15, VCU '20

User avatar
Gautam
Auron
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Zone of Avoidance
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Gautam »

Charbroil wrote:We've been using this set for moderator practice, and I second the comments about bonus variability. On the other hand, the tossups are really well done--they do a good job of being reasonably difficult questions on easy answers.

Incidentally, the Mohammed bonus in the second packet contains a factual error--the trip to Medina occurred in 622, not 662 as asserted in the packet.
To clarify, I'm pretty sure it was 632.

We went through this set for a little while, and it seemed mostly fine. There were a few questions which were out there in terms of difficulty level, and some which seemed to lack a proper easy/medium part (like the bonus on Herman Wouk/Doctorow/Miller), but most seemed okay.

--Gautam
Gautam - ACF
Currently tending to the 'quizbowl hobo' persuasion.

User avatar
Cheynem
Sin
Posts: 6661
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Cheynem »

It's not bad, but it's kind of odd that the trash seems to be heavily '80s, early '90s topics.
Mike Cheyne
Formerly U of Minnesota

"You killed HSAPQ"--Matt Bollinger

gyre and gimble
Tidus
Posts: 723
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:45 am

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by gyre and gimble »

I'm thinking a tossup on Panipat might be too difficult for this level. Maybe I wasn't paying attention or maybe I just don't know enough about Indian history in general (I don't) but I've never seen it come up as a TU answer at high school difficulty.
Stephen Liu
Torrey Pines '10
Harvard '14
Stanford '17

User avatar
Rompimientos del Centauro
Lulu
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:22 pm
Location: NY

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Rompimientos del Centauro »

Sorry about the questionable tossups and fluctuating bonuses, we'll work on that for next year. We will also fact-check more carefully to avoid errors.
York Chen
Hunter '12
Vassar '16

User avatar
Deviant Insider
Auron
Posts: 4672
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Chicagoland
Contact:

Re: Prison Bowl III discussion

Post by Deviant Insider »

Overall, the difficulty level was very good. This set had the highest tossup conversion rate of any set used in Illinois this year--close to 95%. While the field was strong because it was split, with only the top half using this set, the field was not over-the-top incredible--my one-man team was missing our one man, and we beat three teams and took another to overtime.
David Reinstein
PACE VP of Outreach, Head Writer and Editor for Scobol Solo and Masonics (Illinois), TD for New Trier Scobol Solo and New Trier Varsity, Writer for NAQT (2011-2017), IHSSBCA Board Member, IHSSBCA Chair (2004-2014), PACE Member, PACE President (2016-2018), New Trier Coach (1994-2011)

Locked